Skip to comments.
Rep. Sensenbrenner Rams Gun Ban Through On (Voice Vote)
http://www.gunowners.org ^
| Wednesday, November 5, 2003
| http://www.gunowners.org
Posted on 11/05/2003 7:03:36 PM PST by veryone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: veryone
I didn't expect this horsesh*t from Sensenbrenner. Not at all. And how gutless to do it on a voice vote. No balls at all.
41
posted on
11/06/2003 6:51:52 AM PST
by
Dan from Michigan
("Dead or alive, I got a .45, and I never miss" - AC/DC)
To: veryone
In one sense, the ban is meaningless since a completely plastic gun has yet to be invented. It would be like banning Star Trek phaser rifles. The technology is not even there. And no gun manufacturer is even close to developing an all-plastic gun in the near future. Exactly. I'm going to save my energies for something a bit more relevant. There is wisdom in choosing your battles. I'm not fighting in this one. I'll be fresh and ready to go when something significant comes along.
42
posted on
11/06/2003 6:52:14 AM PST
by
Barnacle
(A Human Shield against the onslaught of Leftist tripe.)
To: Dan from Michigan
"I didn't expect this horsesh*t from Sensenbrenner."He's not exactly a freind of personal Freedom, or the 2nd Amend in particular. He's more in line with Sen Lugar(R) IN.
43
posted on
11/06/2003 6:57:21 AM PST
by
spunkets
To: Barnacle
All Voice Vote must stop
44
posted on
11/06/2003 6:57:58 AM PST
by
veryone
To: veryone; Joe Brower; Jeff Head; SLB
So who was the GOP polidiot assigned to babysit / guard the floor that day ? If such crap is gonna happen in the dark of night then at any given time there needs to be at least three GOP congresscritters present if even one Socialist Rat is near the floor of congress to prevent such backdoor BS.
Stay Safe !
45
posted on
11/06/2003 7:29:47 AM PST
by
Squantos
(Support Mental Health !........OR I"LL KILL YOU !!!!)
To: deport
Now tanks I don't know what to do with, but maybe just maybe we can bury those aircraft like the Iraqis did with some of theirs...... I'll side with the United States government in that fight.
To: George Smiley
I just entered H.R. 3348 and then clicked on Summary.
Once before I found they create temporary files that left me creating links to nothing. Maybe that's what happening to you.
Did you try the link to S. 1774 that I made in a subsequent comment? I just got online and your comment is the first that I read and answered.
47
posted on
11/06/2003 7:32:06 AM PST
by
neverdem
(Say a prayer for New York both for it's lefty statism and the probability the city will be hit again)
To: George Smiley
I belive that's what happened. I just tried the link to the S. 1774 and got an error message. I went back to Thomas, entered H.R. 3348 and did a "copy and paste" on the second version here:
Bill 2 of 2
There is 1 other version of this bill. GPO's PDF version of this bill References to this bill in the Congressional Record Link to the Bill Summary & Status file. Printer Friendly Display - 2,028 bytes.[Help]
To reauthorize the ban on undetectable firearms. (Engrossed as Agreed to or Passed by House)
108th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3348
AN ACT
To reauthorize the ban on undetectable firearms.
HR 3348 EH
108th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3348
AN ACT
To reauthorize the ban on undetectable firearms.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE BAN ON UNDETECTABLE FIREARMS.
Section 2(f)(2) of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 (18 U.S.C. 922 note) is amended--
(1) by striking `15' and inserting `25';
(2) in subparagraph (B)--
(A) by striking `and (h)' and inserting `through (o)'; and
(B) by striking `and (g)' and inserting `through (n)'; and
(3) by striking subparagraphs (D) and (E) and inserting the following:
`(D) section 924(a)(1) of such title is amended by striking `this subsection, subsection (b), (c), or (f) of this section, or in section 929' and inserting `this chapter'; and
`(E) section 925(a) of such title is amended--
`(i) in paragraph (1), by striking `and provisions relating to firearms subject to the prohibitions of section 922(p)'; and
`(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking `, except for provisions relating to firearms subject to the prohibitions of section 922(p),'; and
`(iii) in each of paragraphs (3) and (4), by striking `except for provisions relating to firearms subject to the prohibitions of section 922(p),'.'.
Passed the House of Representatives November 5, 2003.
Attest:
Clerk.
THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT GO TO
Next Hit Forward New Bills Search
Prev Hit Back HomePage
Hit List Best Sections Help
Contents Display
48
posted on
11/06/2003 7:48:07 AM PST
by
neverdem
(Say a prayer for New York both for it's lefty statism and the probability the city will be hit again)
To: waterstraat
As I recall, didnt Reagan promised at the beginning of his presidency, to veto any gun control law that hit his desk???? - the oppositite of what bush said.
Of course, Reagan signed Volkmer-McClure in 1986, which could be the worst gun control act ever passed, since it denies all future generations of Americans the right to keep and bear modern rifles of the type borne by troops in our standing army. (Limits select fire weapons to pre-1986 technology, with 1 gun for each 1000 "citizens.")
To: Once-Ler
Wow...look at all the babbling Paleo-Cons fretting over a ban on a gun that doesn't even exist. So I suppose you have to be a paleo-con to take the Second Amendment literally now?
50
posted on
11/06/2003 8:24:47 AM PST
by
jmc813
(Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
To: veryone
I thought Sensenbrenner used to be a friend of gun rights. What happened?
To: FSPress
Now what was that you were saying about Texas? My comments were only 4 sentences long.
52
posted on
11/06/2003 10:26:23 AM PST
by
Once-Ler
(Proud Republican and Bushbot)
To: Beelzebubba
I guess I forgot about that provision, but most of the rest of the bill was good wasnt it? I think Reaganalso thought it was a pro gun bill, esp about allowing citizens to be able to travel with guns. I dont own any machine guns, and dont want one, but I do travel with guns, so Volkmer-McClure has benifited me so far.
To: waterstraat
I guess I forgot about that provision, but most of the rest of the bill was good wasnt it? I think Reaganalso thought it was a pro gun bill, esp about allowing citizens to be able to travel with guns. I dont own any machine guns, and dont want one, but I do travel with guns, so Volkmer-McClure has benifited me so far.
Of course, if the purpose of the second amendment is not to provide convenience for travelers, but as a bulwark against a standing army, then the bill would seem to be one of the most dangerous ones in the history of our nation.
To: veryone
Those sorry, worthless jackasses...out with the lot of them.
55
posted on
11/06/2003 2:35:38 PM PST
by
lodwick
(Wake up, America!)
To: Joe Brower
Nonsensenbrenner threatens endangered species.
56
posted on
11/06/2003 4:45:00 PM PST
by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: Beelzebubba; waterstraat
The law you are referring to was called, The Firearm Owners Protection Act. It's been the only rollback of Federal gun laws ever passed.
It allowed not only for safe and secure interstate transportation of firearms, it removed the ban on mail order ammo sales.
Reagan was a very good friend of the Second Amendment.
57
posted on
11/06/2003 5:33:18 PM PST
by
Bolivar
To: neverdem
think it got around DeLay because he's throwing the anti-gun nuts a bone that means nothing, but it would sound bad in the traditional media who know very little about guns or technology. Dream on.
do you have any idea if they have any usuable practical anti-matter particles bigger than positrons?
IIRC, they've made pretty much all the anti-particles. Of course they don't stick around long, and storing anything larger than an anti-proton would be energically problematic, but I think they have stored substantial numbers of anti-protons. (That's harder than storing protons, because all that happens with a proton if your storage containment fails or leaks, is that it grabs an electron and becomes a hydrogen atom. An anti proton anillates a proton and you get a nice big gamma ray.)
58
posted on
11/06/2003 7:45:56 PM PST
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: steplock
thanks
59
posted on
11/06/2003 7:50:08 PM PST
by
veryone
To: Beelzebubba
Of course, Reagan signed Volkmer-McClure in 1986, which could be the worst gun control act ever passed True, but the bill also contained lots of good stuff. Like taking the wind out of the BATFs sails, for a while at least, like removing the recording of every "handgun" ammunition sale (including all .22 rimfire), removing the prohibition on buy ammunition interstate w/o a FFL, and probably most importantly, prohibiting states and localitis from charging you with a crime, for merely transporting an unloaded and locked away firearm accross their jurisidiction, even if you didn't intend to *be* in their jurisdiction. The machine gun ban was a last minute, literally, addition to the bill. If the President had a line item veto, he might have vetoed that part. (In any event, it merely awaits the proper interpretaion of the wording to return to the previously existing arrangement, even though what is being enforced is the intent of the Clymer that offered that amendment, rather than what the law actually says)
60
posted on
11/06/2003 7:56:54 PM PST
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson