Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Block Pryor as Brown Moves Toward Senate Filibuster
TBO ^ | 11/6/03 | Jesse Holland

Posted on 11/06/2003 10:04:29 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

WASHINGTON (AP) - Senate Democrats on Thursday blocked Alabama Attorney General William Pryor from a U.S. Appeals Court seat for a second time as Republicans, meanwhile, moved California judge Janice Rogers Brown toward what is likely to be the same fate in the closely divided Senate. Pryor again failed to get the 60 votes needed from the 100-member chamber to break a filibuster of his nomination to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta. His nomination was first filibustered by Democrats in July.

Republicans say liberal groups have unfairly painted Pryor as an extremist from the far right.

"They call him an extreme ideologue, a crusader to push the law far to the right," said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala. "Anybody who knows him and knows the circumstances under which he has operated knows the courage he has shown, knows that these charges are just bogus."

Brown, a California judge seeking a seat on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, is sure to be next, Republicans said.

"Democrats are virtually certain to filibuster Janice Rogers Brown," said Senate Judiciary Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, after his committee pushed her nomination to the Senate floor on a 10-9 vote Thursday.

All nine of the committee's Democrats voted against Brown, who would become the second black woman on the D.C. appeals court. That usually indicates that they will attempt to filibuster the nomination on the Senate floor.

The Senate has approved 168 federal trial and appeals judges for President Bush, but Democrats are filibustering four Appeals Court nominees: Pryor, Texas judge Priscilla Owen, Mississippi judge Charles Pickering and Hispanic lawyer Miguel Estrada. Estrada dropped his nomination after Republicans failed to break the filibuster.

Pryor only got 51 votes in the Senate, which has 51 Republicans, 48 Democrats and one independent senator. The only Democrats to vote for Pryor on Thursday were Sens. Zell Miller of Georgia and Ben Nelson of Nebraska.

Pryor is an ardent opponent of abortion rights for women and has criticized the Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. But he has said he will follow the current law if confirmed.

Democrats don't believe him. "His views are at the extreme of legal thinking," said Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass. "The people of the Eleventh Circuit deserve a nominee who will follow the rules of law, and not use the federal bench to advance his own extreme ideology."

Brown, a California Supreme Court justice, also supports limits on abortion rights and corporate liability and opposes affirmative action. Democrats have accused her of being a conservative judicial activist who ignores the law in favor of her own political views.

Republicans say the opposition has more to do with the fact she is a conservative black woman who might one day rise to the Supreme Court.

"When well-qualified judicial nominees face obstruction for specious claims, it's an ominous sign of things to come," said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas.



TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: billpryor; judicialnominees; nominations; obstructionists

1 posted on 11/06/2003 10:04:29 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The judicial branch is hijacked once again by the children of the left.
2 posted on 11/06/2003 10:14:18 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Nuclear NOW!
3 posted on 11/06/2003 10:15:41 AM PST by upchuck (Encourage HAMAS to pre-test their explosive devices. A dud always spoils everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
We will remember, come November!
4 posted on 11/06/2003 10:16:58 AM PST by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Dems just lost Kentucky and Mississippi and now they want to lose some more? Fine by me.
5 posted on 11/06/2003 10:20:24 AM PST by linn37 (Have you hugged your Phlebotomist today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
By doing nothing about these partisan filibusters, the Republicans simply invite more, on thinner and thinner grounds. Ultimately, the Democrats may simply refuse to confirm any judges, and if the voters don't care next November, that will be that.
6 posted on 11/06/2003 10:22:11 AM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Do you happen to know which two "republicans" voted against Pryor? Was Arlen, (hopefully not the next chairman of the judiciary committee) one of them?
7 posted on 11/06/2003 10:22:48 AM PST by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linn37
Senate dems now threatening to block energy bill.

Truly these people have a retirement wish.

8 posted on 11/06/2003 10:27:51 AM PST by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Brown, a California Supreme Court justice, also supports limits on abortion rights and corporate liability and opposes affirmative action."

There is so much that is wrong with this sentence and so much that is left out. We don't know her views on these issues. We know how she ruled on certain cases that involved these issues. For example, on affirmative action, she voted not to strike down the vote of the people on Prop. 209. Maybe she simply believed that there was no constitutional basis for that law to be struck down. For all I know, she may think that AA is a wise idea, but it's not her place to legislate from the bench.

It's amazing how this stuff gets by and is accepted by so many.
9 posted on 11/06/2003 10:30:44 AM PST by republicofdavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"His views are at the extreme of legal thinking," said Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.

Ahem, cough. Cough.

"The people of the Eleventh Circuit deserve a nominee who will follow the rules of law,

and not use the federal bench to advance his own extreme ideology."

That's what the Senate is for, right Senator?

10 posted on 11/06/2003 10:33:00 AM PST by lowbridge (As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly. -Mr. Carlson, WKRP in Cincinnati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Geez, I didn't know Pryor was a Roman Catholic!
11 posted on 11/06/2003 10:33:42 AM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I have given up being outraged and the Dems for this... my outrage is aimed squarely at Sen. Fritz.
12 posted on 11/06/2003 10:46:03 AM PST by Lunatic Fringe (I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
We will remember, come November!

Bush needs to continue to put up more 'extremists'. A constant flow of 'extremist' judges will be constantly filabustered. Eventually, it will bring the truth to the American people about the Democrat's lack of respect for democracy.

13 posted on 11/06/2003 11:29:14 AM PST by m1-lightning (If Al Queda had a flag, it would be yellow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson