Skip to comments.
Explosions on far side of sun
Art Bell Show
Posted on 11/09/2003 10:58:41 PM PST by per loin
Professor Ramon Lopez, Art's first hour guest, confirmed that there are very large explosions taking place on the far side of the sun. Quite possibly these are coming from sunspot 10486. We do not know if that sunspot is now shrinking or is growing. From this side, all we are seeing are the full halos expanding out.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: signsandwonders; solarflare; solarflare2003; solarflares; sunspots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: per loin
...Me to! But he did say this was gonna happen!
I could say the same thing about a major earthquake "event" happening in nor-cal within 5 years, with the "next major pre-cursor" being an September election (50% chance of being right) after the harvest moon (most major earthquakes in CA happen in October).
I have, I say, a 65% chance of this happening, no remote viewing necessary!
21
posted on
11/09/2003 11:16:50 PM PST
by
Pro-Bush
(Homeland Security + Tom Ridge = Open Borders --> Demand Change!)
To: per loin
22
posted on
11/09/2003 11:19:56 PM PST
by
John H K
To: per loin
Does Gary Larson know about this?
To: Spruce
From
http://www.spacew.com Solar Activity Update
Solar activity has declined to quiet levels following the intense "flare storm" of the last 2 weeks. Even though the primary active regions have now rotated behind the Sun, we continue to observe weak long-duration pulses of enhanced x-ray activity that is undoubtably due to strong solar flare activity behind the Sun. Region 484, responsible for several X-class solar flares and the first to rotate behind the western limb of the Sun on 30 October appears to be responsible for several large coronal mass ejections on the back-side of the Sun. This region should rotate back to the eastern solar limb and becomem visible again between about November 12 and November 14. Powerhouse Region 486 isn't due to return until between about November 17 and November 19. The odds are against them surviving in a volatile form, although it is entirely possible they could retain sufficient complexity.
24
posted on
11/09/2003 11:22:40 PM PST
by
John H K
To: John H K
Thanks, John.
25
posted on
11/09/2003 11:28:08 PM PST
by
per loin
To: John H K
I am most curious regarding the hardware. Is this all SOHO data?
26
posted on
11/09/2003 11:30:26 PM PST
by
Spruce
To: per loin
I'm coming up with zero...every site I look at suggests the Sun is quiet right now, but that image from LASCO has me wondering.
27
posted on
11/09/2003 11:30:31 PM PST
by
Aracelis
To: Piltdown_Woman
That Lasco image has looked pretty much like that for at least 18 hours, according to the sequence of images
here.
28
posted on
11/09/2003 11:36:59 PM PST
by
per loin
To: John H K
....Some solar minimum. What happened to our 11 year cycle?
29
posted on
11/09/2003 11:37:21 PM PST
by
Pro-Bush
(Homeland Security + Tom Ridge = Open Borders --> Demand Change!)
To: Piltdown_Woman
My favorite streaming sites are.
http://www.cjob.com/home/index.cfm and
http://www.kfi640.com Between the 2 of them I get pretty decent coverage.
BTW - how long does it take for the rotation of the sun? Isn't it bewtween 21-30 days depending upon where the sunspot is?
If we lost site of 486 and 484 about a week ago I think they'll be heading back around in a couple weeks. If the crazyness keeps up it may be intersting when the those two giants come back around.
HF skip conditions are just as hot as ever and they should have been tapering off by now.... Kind of cool.
Maybe we'll get some full-on aurora...
To: KuernoDeChivo
Yes, rotation depends on latitude:
31
posted on
11/09/2003 11:52:05 PM PST
by
Aracelis
To: per loin; dighton; Jeremiah Jr; hellinahandcart
To: Thinkin' Gal
Uh oh. Busted!
33
posted on
11/10/2003 12:09:23 AM PST
by
per loin
To: per loin
To: Piltdown_Woman
So I imagine that if the days noted are for a "full" rotation then it would a few days less from the time we lose sight of a spot to when we first see the spot coming back around.
If I recall from my radio experience it is like 21 days to where the spots will first start effecting the ionisphere again.
Nice image. Interesting that there is about 10+ days of difference between the equator and the poles.
To: per loin
Professor Ramon Lopez, Art's first hour guest, confirmed that there are very large explosions taking place on the far side of the sun. Quite possibly these are coming from sunspot 10486. We do not know if that sunspot is now shrinking or is growing. From this side, all we are seeing are the full halos expanding out.I hope all the people on the Doppelganger Earth ("htraE"?) are OK.
36
posted on
11/10/2003 12:38:23 AM PST
by
jennyp
(http://www.bestmessageboard.com)
To: jennyp
I'd reckon them folks to be enjoyin' their aroruas.
37
posted on
11/10/2003 12:43:37 AM PST
by
per loin
To: per loin
A scientist was on C2C a couple of days ago and he was saying the sun was reacting to large meteors impacting its surface. He was also saying that we are experiencing the initial effects of much more space junk, meteors and other types of debris moving into our solar system.
If he is correct -- I do not have any idea one way or the other -- the sun may start blasting away more often.
There was a gigantic solar emission last year about 180 degrees away from the our planet. Lucky for us -- because it was large it would have fried all living things on the earth.
38
posted on
11/10/2003 1:19:10 AM PST
by
ex-Texan
(CBS [SeeBS] Deserves a Long Double Flush . . . Pull the Chain!)
To: per loin
"There is no fiery side of the Sun, really. In fact, it's all fiery."
(/lame joke)
39
posted on
11/10/2003 1:22:35 AM PST
by
Skwidd
(Fire Controlman First Class Extraordinaire)
To: per loin
Tell us when the explosions are on the dark side of the moon...then we'll know they're having a fireworks show in honor of David Gilmour.
40
posted on
11/10/2003 1:23:09 AM PST
by
RichInOC
(...by the way, which one's Pink?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson