[GulliverSwift]

I looked for this article but it doesn't look as though it's been posted.

This is another great example of the fact that DEMOCRATS are the party of the uber-rich. DEMOCRATS are not the party of the little guy, they're the party of drug addicts, bums, and anti-Semite rich people.

[Naspino]

But don't be afraid of any of this.. You should be afraid of Big Business, Big Oil, Big Tobacco, Big Guns, ...etc, etc, etc. You should be afraid of the the collections of people and workers not wacko's with a inheritance...

[headsonpikes]

Since the demise of the Soviet Union, the Democratic Party has become the leading enemy of the American Republic.

[GulliverSwift]

Soros ping.

[RippleFire]

bump

[ghost of nixon]

What I would question is: How healthy are these super-donations & 527 Special-Interest groups to the Democrat Party? I would think they would tend to keep the Democrats captive to narrow, ultra-liberal special interests, rather than let them grow up, innovate and recapture some of the political center.

[PoisedWoman]

DEMOCRATS are the party of the uber-rich. DEMOCRATS are not the party of the little guy, they're the party of drug addicts, bums, and anti-Semite rich people.

What about all the rich Jews who support the Dems? Most of them do, as reported in Jewish World Review and other publications after the last election. It's always been the case. Perhaps the obvious and growing anti-Semitism of Rat bigwigs will turn some of those votes and dollars in our direction.

[jmstein7]

BUMP! FR needs to start its own "soft money" group.

However, we should note that pouring a ton of money does not a campaign make; remember Terry McAwful saying "Jeb Bush is GONE" and pouring millions upon millions into Florida?

Today, Governor Jeb Bush is laughing.

However, we, the grassroots GOP, needs to start orgainzing soft money groups NOW to remain competitive!!!

[Cicero]

George Soros is one of the prime enemies of Western Civilization. He thrives on destruction.

I imagine that $10 million is probably only the tip of the iceberg. Bush will raise far more hard money than the Democrats, because he gets lots of donations from individual donors--$1,000 and less. But the Democrats will far outspend the Republicans with soft money, not to mention the billions of dollars in free advertising they get from the major media.

What a joke, that the Republicans are the party of the rich.

[Texas_Jarhead]

soft money BUMP

[CPT Clay]

Are there any billionare republicans?

[UCANSEE2]

Of course, it was mostly Democrats who said they wanted to remove the allegedly corrupting influence of big contributions in politics. Now, however, the passage of McCain-Feingold has created an irony: By and large, Republicans are working within the spirit of a law they opposed -- that is, relying on limited hard-money contributions from individuals -- while Democrats are violating the spirit of a law they supported -- that is, relying on the kind of unlimited soft-money contributions they roundly condemned during the reform debate.

DEMOCRAT Motto: Do as we say, not as we do.

[vannrox]

.

While George Soros may be a United States Citizen...
He must comply with the Campaign Spending Limits...
Which are limited to $2000 a person...
Unless...

It is a Corporate Sponsor.

BUT...

George Soros DOESN'T OWN ANY AMERICAN COPRORATIONS!

... Today he is chairman of the Open Society Institute (OSI) and the founder of a network of philanthropic organizations that are active in more than 50 countries. Based primarily in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union but also in Africa, Latin America,and Asia

Given this information...Why do the weak wristed Rubublicans allow this man to openly break the law, and flaunt it all over television. I thought that Campaign contributions from foreign sources are FORBIDDEN and highly ILLEGAL! Why doesn't John Ashcroft do something about this criminal?

[GOP_Lady]

Oh, how I wish I still worked at Progressive -- it would be worth it to see Peter Lewis' face when he walked past my cube and saw a pic of "W" on it.

[Ronaldus Magnus Reagan]

Fred Barnes of Fox news just brought up a good point. George Soros is probably upset that he is being ignored for his financial advice to presidents. Fred said that Bill Clinton basically ignored him and George Bush has too. Perhaps Arnold Schwarzenegger did too. Fred said that in the first half of the 20th century, rich financiers like Bernard Baruch were often sought out by presidents to get their thoughts on world financial affairs.

So, George Soros reminds me of the Glenn Close character in the movie "Fatal Attraction" where she said to Michael Douglas..." I WILL NOT BE IGNORED"

Just consider this as George's hissy fit.

[Alas Babylon!]

Bill O'Reilly talking about Soros and MoveOn right now. Catch also on the rebroadcast. Top of the show.

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks for posting this scary and very revealing article of how the rich like $oreA$$ have been funding the rats for a long time and continue to.

I have bookmarked it.

[Grampa Dave]

FYI.

A scary and indepth article about $oreA$$ and his money and other rich libs and how they use non profits to spread their money and direct it to rats running for office.

[backhoe]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1032146/posts

White House playing into Soros' hands?
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, December 2, 2003 | By J. Michael Waller

 

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1032116/posts

W'S FOES FLIP OUT
New York Post ^ | December 2, 2003 | John Podhoretz
Wayne Madsen has given me three full days of giggles, so I have to love the detestable little psycho for that--Here is a link to Madsen's original article. It has links to some discussions in the blogsphere and some e-mail responses by Madsen himself.

Wayne Madsen: Wag the Turkey - Surprise Thanksgiving Dinner at 6 AM?

Mark Steyn has written about Wayne Madsen's disability over here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1031952/posts

Looks like Taranto over at WSJ's "Best of the Web" has picked up on the story:

A Stopped Clock Is Right Twice a Day(scroll down)

Your "Wagging the Media" followup still doesn't account for the fact that a 'dumb-as-dirt ordinary citizen' like me could figure out that the dinner was served in the P.M., while you 'sycophantically' reported it as A.M. I guess since I'm not a journalist, I'm not smart enough to make up new facts...
He did post a pretty lame followup

Madsen's bogus story is still making its way through the loony portion of the internet. The Counterpunch version is linked at anti-war site WHATREALLYHAPPENED.COM and is copied at the Jeff Rense site. Until Madsen issues a correction at the source, this lunacy will continue to spread -- to the great amusement of many like myself.

 

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1032191/posts

Soros-Sponsored Group Enlists Hollywood in Anti-Bush Bid
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 12/02/03 | David Thibault
I love the way they won't do anything unless someone else pays through the nose for them to do it. So much for principle.

 

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1019650/posts

Proof that George Soros is using Foreign Funds to influence a US Election!
Various Sources | 11-11-2003 | Various - Compiled by VANNROX
There are rumors that Soros is trying to trigger a run on the dollar, hoping to profit on the destruction of the US economy the way he did from Malaysia's.

 

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1030497/posts

SOROS' INSIDER CONVICTION BACKSTORY Billionaire says he didn't have insider knowledge
AP Worldstream | 11/08/2002 | VERENA VON DERSCHAU

 

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1030490/posts

Billionaire Soros stakes fortune on 'matter of life and death' - defeating George Bush
The Independent (U.K.) ^ | 11/29/03 | Andrew Gumbel

 

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1033288/posts

Who is Peter Lewis?
Accuracy In Media ^ | December 3, 2003 | Arne Steinberg