Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Panel Rules Justice Moore Failed to Respect & Comply with Law; Judge removed from Supreme Court

Posted on 11/13/2003 9:23:02 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 701-707 next last
To: Ronaldus Magnus
Disbarment would be a separate action before the state bar's disciplinary committee.
61 posted on 11/13/2003 9:41:39 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
It's the State Court of The Judiciary. They have jurisdiciton over matters of judicial ethics in the state.

Well in most states it is up to elected representatives to make those judgements. Also where in the Constitution do the federal courts get to dictate to state courts on issues that are not explictly given to the federal government in the Constitution. If anything the federal courts are guilty of removing the 10th amendment from the US Constitution.

62 posted on 11/13/2003 9:41:54 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
Again with the exaggerations. The only thing that Separationists are trying to do is forbid government entities from showing preference for certain faiths. That is hardly "everything".

No. They've chosen antiChrist.

63 posted on 11/13/2003 9:42:02 AM PST by concerned about politics ( So it is. It is done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Where did Judge Moore get the "right" to make decorating decisions on the courthouse? Isn't that the State Supreme Court, not his personal soapbox?
64 posted on 11/13/2003 9:42:04 AM PST by sharkhawk (I want to go to St. Somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus
After this whole episode, he just might be re-elected unanimously.

I think you're right on target. You'd be surprised at the number of Ten Commandment signs that have popped up in yards all over Alabama in recent weeks. IMHO, he ignored the rule of law and deserves removal; however, the Ten Commandments are quite popular in my neck of the woods.

65 posted on 11/13/2003 9:42:05 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
INTREP - MOORE
66 posted on 11/13/2003 9:42:42 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
William Pryor is not a judge (he is nominated to be a federal judge, but he hasn't been confirmed). He is the attorney general for the state of Alabama.

Thanks... there I go jumping the gun again. ;)

67 posted on 11/13/2003 9:42:43 AM PST by cgk (Kraut, 1989: We must brace ourselves for disquisitions on peer pressure, adolescent anomie & rage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
So individuals in public office do not have a right to freedom of speech?? Think about it, you going to have to put a muzzle on every public individual from believing in anything, from faith in parking tickets to faith in God.
68 posted on 11/13/2003 9:43:05 AM PST by Porterville (Grow some leather or go away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9; Chancellor Palpatine
He's giving his stump speech now.
69 posted on 11/13/2003 9:43:07 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
"I really don't give a damn, jump off a bridge if you want."

That's a very Christian thing to say. What book and verse is that from?
70 posted on 11/13/2003 9:43:15 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Court of the Judiciary
»What is the Court of the Judiciary?

The Court of the Judiciary is created consisting of one judge of an appellate court, other than the Supreme Court, who shall be selected by the Supreme Court and shall serve as Chief Judge of the Court of the Judiciary; two judges of the circuit court, who shall be selected by the Circuit Judges' Association; and one district judge who shall be selected by the District Judges' Association. Other members of the Court of the Judiciary shall consist of two members of the state bar, who shall be selected by the governing body of the Alabama State Bar; two persons who are not lawyers who shall be appointed by the Governor; and one person appointed by the Lieutenant Governor. Members appointed by the Governor and Lieutenant Governor shall be subject to Senate confirmation before serving. Provided, however, that on January 1, 2005, the appointment authority granted to the Lieutenant Governor shall revert to the Governor and the Governor shall therefore be entitled to appoint three persons who are not lawyers, subject to Senate confirmation. The court shall be convened to hear complaints filed by the . The court shall have authority, after notice and public hearing (1) to remove from office, suspend without pay, or censure a judge, or apply such other sanction as may be prescribed by law, for violation of a Canon of Judicial Ethics, misconduct in office, failure to perform his duties, or (2) to suspend with or without pay, or to retire a judge who is physically or mentally unable to perform his duties. Taken from the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, Amendment 581, §6.18.


71 posted on 11/13/2003 9:43:23 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Again with the exaggerations. The only thing that Separationists are trying to do is forbid government entities from showing preference for certain faiths. That is hardly "everything".

No. They've chosen antiChrist.

Not all separationists voted for Clinton.

-Eric

72 posted on 11/13/2003 9:43:30 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: LadyPilgrim
I am sickened by this decision.

Why? Should a judge be able to act unlawfully as long as he's on "God's side"?

Do you realize that what you long for isn't a constitutional republic, but rather a theocracy?
73 posted on 11/13/2003 9:44:04 AM PST by Belial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: cgk
Thanks... there I go jumping the gun again. ;)

Pryor is one of the four judges for which the Senate is having their talkathon.

74 posted on 11/13/2003 9:44:14 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
I simply answered your question as to whom the "panel" was...

The [Alabama] Court of the Judiciary is created consisting of one judge of an appellate court, other than the Supreme Court, who shall be selected by the Supreme Court and shall serve as Chief Judge of the Court of the Judiciary; two judges of the circuit court, who shall be selected by the Circuit Judges' Association; and one district judge who shall be selected by the District Judges' Association. Other members of the Court of the Judiciary shall consist of two members of the state bar, who shall be selected by the governing body of the Alabama State Bar; two persons who are not lawyers who shall be appointed by the Governor; and one person appointed by the Lieutenant Governor. Members appointed by the Governor and Lieutenant Governor shall be subject to Senate confirmation before serving. Provided, however, that on January 1, 2005, the appointment authority granted to the Lieutenant Governor shall revert to the Governor and the Governor shall therefore be entitled to appoint three persons who are not lawyers, subject to Senate confirmation. The court shall be convened to hear complaints filed by the Judicial Inquiry Commission. The court shall have authority, after notice and public hearing (1) to remove from office, suspend without pay, or censure a judge, or apply such other sanction as may be prescribed by law, for violation of a Canon of Judicial Ethics, misconduct in office, failure to perform his duties, or (2) to suspend with or without pay, or to retire a judge who is physically or mentally unable to perform his duties. Taken from the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, Amendment 581, §6.18.

75 posted on 11/13/2003 9:44:16 AM PST by TheBigB (One picture is worth a thousand dollars, but the sheep has to be wearing lipstick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Will Judge Moore and Paris Hilton appear on the same talk show on the same day? (Or star in the same movie?)
76 posted on 11/13/2003 9:44:23 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Sound just like those defending the Dixie Chicks. Where has Moore's freedom of speech been threatened? It seems like he won't shut up. He wasn't removed for stating his beliefs, he was removed because he didn't have the authority to place the stone there in the first place.
77 posted on 11/13/2003 9:44:28 AM PST by sharkhawk (I want to go to St. Somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Sound just like those defending the Dixie Chicks. Where has Moore's freedom of speech been threatened? It seems like he won't shut up. He wasn't removed for stating his beliefs, he was removed because he didn't have the authority to place the stone there in the first place.
78 posted on 11/13/2003 9:44:32 AM PST by sharkhawk (I want to go to St. Somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
Many NAZI's were following the law of their land too! I wonder what it takes now days for someone to stand up for what is right? If we go down the path of you follow the law no matter what we are no better than previous regimes...
79 posted on 11/13/2003 9:44:46 AM PST by Patriot1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
Yep, he sees himself on the national stage (see my #59).
80 posted on 11/13/2003 9:45:04 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 701-707 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson