Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FRN LAUNCHES WEB SITE ON SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE MEMO, CALLS FOR SEN. ROCKEFELLER TO RESIGN
Free Republic Network ^ | 11/17/2003 | Free Republic Network

Posted on 11/17/2003 7:07:02 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks

***NEWS RELEASE***

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 17, 2003
Contact: Joe Giganti (frn@freeper.org)
(703) 928-9695

FREE REPUBLIC NETWORK LAUNCHES WEB SITE ON SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE MEMO, CALLS FOR SENATOR ROCKEFELLER TO RESIGN

(Washington, DC) The Free Republic Network today announced the unveiling of www.intelmemo.com, a new web site that provides news, analysis and research material regarding the plans by partisan Democrats on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence to use sensitive intelligence data for political attacks against the Bush Administration, as outlined in a recently revealed internal memo. The Network also called for the immediate resignation of the Committee’s Vice Chairman, Senator Jay Rockefeller. Executive Director Robert Hahn released the following statement:

“The members of the Senate Intelligence Committee have access to our government’s most sensitive secrets. The lives of America’s soldiers and intelligence agents depend on their using that knowledge responsibly. It is now clear that certain partisan members of this vital committee have conspired to misuse their positions, influence, and access to classified information to undermine President Bush during the 2004 campaign season.

The leaked memo describes a phony ‘independent investigation’ designed to let the Democrats dig through classified material – information that should be used to improve our national security – to support and publicize their political agenda. We agree with Senator Zell Miller that this abuse must not be tolerated, ignored, or excused, and that “heads should roll.”

Therefore, I ask every American citizen to join me in calling for the immediate resignation of Jay Rockefeller from the United States Senate. As ranking Democratic member of the Intelligence Committee, Senator Rockefeller is responsible for the acts of his subordinates. We cannot permit America's national security to be damaged by partisan political warfare.”

The complete contents of the memo, press articles, transcripts from the Congressional Record and other information can be found at www.intelmemo.com.

The Free Republic Network is a 501(c)(4) public service corporation whose mission is to organize, train and support conservative activists nationwide. It provides information and organizational services to more than 50 regional and issue-based chapters around the country, and serves as the activism arm of the Free Republic Forum.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters
KEYWORDS: 2004memo; frn; intelcommittee; jayrockefeller; memogate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-342 next last
To: Chad Fairbanks
Man, but you is quick.
321 posted on 11/20/2003 7:13:31 PM PST by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
LOL... I just happened to look, saw it, bumped it, then realized it had only been up for like a minute... oh well ;0)
322 posted on 11/20/2003 7:23:00 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Western NY ping!
323 posted on 11/20/2003 8:53:19 PM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
Thanks!
324 posted on 11/20/2003 9:14:55 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks; MeeknMing; JohnHuang2
America is at war.

We are at war against the network of international terrorists who committed the mass murders of 9/11. We are at war against the survivors of Saddam Hussein's regime, and against the remnants of the Taliban in Afghanistan. Americans have died, and continue to die in this struggle.

The leadership of the Democratic Party is also at war.

However, their war is against President George W. Bush. And this war is the highest priority of Democratic decision-makers -- even within the traditionally nonpartisan Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

On November 5, 2003, Americans were given an unprecedented look inside the Democrats' war, when Fox News published an astoundingly revealing memorandum from within the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, describing how Democrats on the Committee intend to use their positions, influence, and access to information - not to help win the war on terror, or to protect American citizens - but to undermine the Bush Administration. The memo describes their agreement to launch an "independent investigation" as a means to that end, timed to coincide with the 2004 presidential campaign.

The purpose of a real investigation, of course, is to gather information, analyze it, and arrive at a conclusion. But the memo makes it clear that the Democrats on the Intelligence Committee have already reached their conclusions. This "investigation" is a sham, intended purely to support and publicize their political agenda.

By signing onto this scheme, the Democratic members of the Senate Committee on Intelligence have abused their positions, undercut American troops and agents in the field, and violated their oaths of office.

This must not stand.

325 posted on 11/21/2003 5:46:18 AM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

326 posted on 11/21/2003 6:57:37 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (http://richard.meek.home.comcast.net/SorosClintoon.JPG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Thanks, Meek!
327 posted on 11/21/2003 9:10:07 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Bump again - keep up the good work!
328 posted on 11/21/2003 10:09:40 AM PST by talleyman (Something wicked this way comes - Hillary, you're on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: talleyman
Thanks, Talleyman!
329 posted on 11/21/2003 10:10:58 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: diotima
I thought he already announced he's stepping down!
330 posted on 11/21/2003 11:57:32 AM PST by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republicus2001
Where did you hear that????
331 posted on 11/21/2003 7:16:42 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Which party can be trusted with America's national security?

Democrats 2578 (37.50%)
Republicans 3902 (56.76%)
Libertarians 78 (1.13%)
Greens 157 (2.28%)
None of the Above 160 (2.33%)

There are people who actually think the Greens can be trusted to handle our national security? I guess what they mean to say is, there is no need for national security.

That pretty much goes for the Libertarians, too.

332 posted on 11/22/2003 5:05:59 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
I think the important point ultimately (and politically) is whether or not there were good reasons to invade Iraq (WMD and terrorist support).

1. If there were, and Democrats knew it, then they are traitors, selling out their country with deliberate lies for personal political gain.

2. If there really were not good reasons, then the Bush administration either lied or erred, and Democrats would be doing a service to our system of Government by exposing it (and partisanship can be forgiven - it would even be a virtue).

Hopefully, as information is learned, it will be included, to inform this essential National Security issue that the voters will consider. This is the real center of gravity.

333 posted on 11/22/2003 6:54:59 AM PST by ABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Scary ain't it?
334 posted on 11/22/2003 8:52:20 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: ABN
I don't thinkm at this point, that there is any doubt that the invasion of Iraq had to be done.

In fact, I think we did it a decade too late :(
335 posted on 11/22/2003 8:53:27 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
You and I have no doubt that Sadaam needed to go, to preserve the lives of innocent Americans. Many senior Democrats however, have bet the farm (politically) on convincing enough of the public that this is not the case.

They are pouring their resources into making folks think that:

a. Saddam had no WMDs

b. He was not supporting al Queda.

If it can be shown that they knew that this threat was real against Americans, and they knowingly lied about it for political gain (aiding and abbetting the enemy in the process) then they will be well and truly screwed come election time.

The fact that they were being partisan will mostly inflame partisans of the other party, its just a minor irritation to the middle-of-the-road folks, who generalize that "all politicians are that way". What will really reasonate is who was actually lying to the public (playing us for fools). It will be worse for Democrats if they are caught, because it will have been life-threatening treason, as opposed to just butt-covering or manipulation.

336 posted on 11/22/2003 10:24:22 AM PST by ABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: ABN
Which is why it is so very important to get MemoGate out into the public. It won't be easy, as the media will cover for the rats every chance they get. Only with enough outrage among those in power in DC, will the media no longer be able to ignore it...

And to get that outrage, we have to find ways to get the populace outraged.
337 posted on 11/22/2003 10:27:58 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Shouldn't we also call on Sandra Day O'Connor to resign for saying that she considered current European policies as important in determing the constiutionality and suitability of law today as she regards the U.S. Constitution?
338 posted on 11/22/2003 1:14:06 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Feel free :0)
339 posted on 11/22/2003 6:53:15 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
weekend bump
340 posted on 11/22/2003 8:47:55 PM PST by LurkerNoMore!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-342 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson