Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Statement by the President on Marriage (MUST READ -- Dean/Kerry/Clark Statements Follow)
The White House ^ | Nov 18, 2003 | President Bush

Posted on 11/18/2003 3:02:45 PM PST by PhiKapMom

Statement by the President On Marriage

November 18, 2003

STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT

Marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a woman. Today's decision of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court violates this important principle. I will work with congressional leaders and others to do what is legally necessary to defend the sanctity of marriage.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: bush; catholiclist; clark; dean; family; goodridge; homosexualagenda; howarddean; kerry; marriage; matrimony; presbush; prisoners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-310 next last
Following will be the statements of the RATs which so far are 180 from President Bush's! Anyone that needs an additional reason to support President Bush over any DemocRAT -- here it is!
1 posted on 11/18/2003 3:02:46 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Bump
2 posted on 11/18/2003 3:04:49 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing; My2Cents; onyx; JohnHuang2; Dog Gone; Dog; isthisnickcool; OKSooner; VOA; mhking; ...
And now for the DemocRATS! Let's start with Dean -- do you want this man for President? Spread the word on what he is saying!

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

November 18, 2003

Contact: Press Office, 802-651-3200

Statement of Governor Dean on Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Ruling>

MANCHESTER--Democratic presidential candidate Governor Howard Dean, M.D., issued the following statement today in response to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling:

"As Governor of Vermont, I was proud to sign the nation's first law establishing civil unions for same-sex couples. Today, the Massachusetts Court appears to have taken a similar approach to the Vermont Supreme Court and its decision that led to our civil unions law. One way or another, the state should afford same-sex couples equal treatment under law in areas such as health insurance, hospital visitation and inheritance rights.

"There will be those who try to use the decision today to divide Americans. Instead, this decision should be viewed as an opportunity to affirm what binds us together -- a fundamental belief in the equality of human beings, regardless of race, gender or sexual orientation."

-- 30 --

http://www.deanforamerica.com/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=10573&

3 posted on 11/18/2003 3:06:32 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Don't forget to Visit/donate at http://www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Constitutional amendment is needed.

Some will protest that this is not of sufficient import for amending the Constitution, but it is the traditional family that is the basis for our entire culture and society.

4 posted on 11/18/2003 3:08:02 PM PST by B Knotts (Go 'Nucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: All
Statement from John Kerry on Massachusetts Gay Marriage Ruling

November 18, 2003

For Immediate Release

“I have long believed that gay men and lesbians should be assured equal protection and the same benefits – from health to survivor benefits to hospital visitation - that all families deserve. While I continue to oppose gay marriage, I believe that today’s decision calls on the Massachusetts state legislature to take action to ensure equal protection for gay couples. These protections are long over due.”

http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/pr_2003_1118a.html

6 posted on 11/18/2003 3:08:35 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Don't forget to Visit/donate at http://www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
From The Boston Globe:
"I agree with 3,000 years of recorded history. I disagree with the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts," Republican Gov. Mitt Romney said. "Marriage is an institution between a man and a woman ... and our constitution and laws should reflect that."

7 posted on 11/18/2003 3:09:37 PM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Good for you, Mr. President. A quick reply from the heart that didn't wait for poll numbers.

This alone could get you four more years.

8 posted on 11/18/2003 3:10:17 PM PST by Semper911 (For some people, bread and circus are not enough. Hence, FreeRepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
For Immediate Release
Date: November 18, 2003

General Clark Responds to the Massachusetts Court Decision

"As a society we should be looking for ways to bring us together and as someone who supports the legal rights of all Americans regardless of sexual-orientation, I appreciate todays decision. As President, I would support giving gays and lesbians the legal rights that married couples get. If the Massachusetts legislature decides to legalize same-sex marriages, it will be up to each state to decide whether those marriages will be valid in their state-- and that is a choice each state, not the courts, will have to make.

My hope is that disagreements over this issue can be handled with tolerance and understanding."

http://clark04.com/press/release/085/

9 posted on 11/18/2003 3:10:55 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Don't forget to Visit/donate at http://www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Also from The Boston Globe:
Democratic Rep. Barney Frank, who is openly gay, said the decision "will enhance the lives of probably thousands, maybe tens of thousands, of Massachusetts citizens, and will have no negative effects on anyone else." Rep. Marty Meehan agreed. "There will be some from the right who will try to paint a picture that this will somehow be an infringement on heterosexual couples, I don't view it that way," said Meehan, also a Democrat.

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., said the decision was a "welcome new milestone on the road to full civil rights for all our citizens.

"It's wrong for any state to discriminate against gays and lesbians by denying them the many benefits and protections that the laws of the state provide for married couples," Kennedy said.


10 posted on 11/18/2003 3:11:27 PM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
He said this today after the ruling? Let's hope.
11 posted on 11/18/2003 3:12:56 PM PST by knak (wasknaknowknid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Thanks for posting Bush's statement. We should all call to thank him and urge him to stand firm.
12 posted on 11/18/2003 3:13:01 PM PST by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Tuesday, November 18, 2003

Statement Of Senator Edwards On Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Decision

Senator John Edwards (D-NC) released the following statement today:

"As I have long said, I believe gay and lesbian Americans are entitled to equal respect and dignity under our laws. While I personally do not support gay marriage, I recognize that different states will address this in different ways, and I will oppose any effort to pass an amendment to the United States Constitution in response to the Massachusetts decision.

"We are a nation comprised of men and women from all walks of life. It is in our national character to provide equal opportunity to all, and this is what unites our country, in laws and in shared purpose. That is why today, we must also reach out to those individuals who will try to exploit this decision to further divide our nation, and ask them to refrain from that effort."

http://www.johnedwards2004.com/page.asp?id=370

13 posted on 11/18/2003 3:13:05 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Don't forget to Visit/donate at http://www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Our president is willing to take on this issue in a legal and constitutional manner. The rats can't handle that.

Anyone who posts that there is no difference between the two parties should have their posting privileges banned for posting without a mind.
14 posted on 11/18/2003 3:13:20 PM PST by Grampa Dave (George Soros, the Evil Daddy Warbucks, has owned the DemonicRats for decades!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
While I continue to oppose gay marriage, I believe that today’s decision calls on the Massachusetts state legislature to take action to ensure equal protection for gay couples.

Incompatible goals. We have to realize that it is not an equal protection issue.

15 posted on 11/18/2003 3:13:48 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
Lieberman Statement On Mass. Gay Marriage Ruling (November 18, 2003)

ARLINGTON, VA -- Joe Lieberman issued the following response to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's ruling allowing same-sex unions in the state:

"Although I am opposed to gay marriage, I have also long believed that states have the right to adopt for themselves laws that allow same-sex unions. I will oppose any attempts by the right wing to change the Constitution in response to today's ruling, which would be unnecessary and divisive."

http://www.joe2004.com/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=6270&news_iv_ctrl=1001

16 posted on 11/18/2003 3:15:25 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Don't forget to Visit/donate at http://www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Gov. Mitt Romney said. "Marriage is an institution between a man and a woman ... and our constitution and laws should reflect that."

Thank you, Mr. Governor. I voted for this man.

17 posted on 11/18/2003 3:15:44 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I just went on-air with Jerry Agar (50,000 watts - WPTF, Raleigh) to discuss the ramifications of this decision. Bottom line, I said it will probably be reversed by passage of the proposed US Constition amendment to define marriage as a union of "one man and one woman." Further, I said that President Bush will support this amendment, and all the Democrat candidates will be forced to oppose it, with the result of putting the Democrat nominee -- whoever it is -- further behind the political eight-ball.

Looks like it is playing out that way, though notice the weasel-statement by Kerry who says he "opposes" homosexual marriage but "supports equal rights" for homosexual couples. If he keeps waffling like that, folks will start confusing him with Wesley Clark. LOL.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Double Crossing at the Rio Grande," discussion thread. IF YOU WANT A FREEPER IN CONGRESS, CLICK HERE.

18 posted on 11/18/2003 3:15:45 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
John Kerry
“I have long believed that gay men and lesbians should be assured equal protection and the same benefits – from health to survivor benefits to hospital visitation - that all families deserve. While I continue to oppose gay marriage, I believe that today’s decision calls on the Massachusetts state legislature to take action to ensure equal protection for gay couples. These protections are long over due.”

Is this the mother of all waffles or what?

19 posted on 11/18/2003 3:15:52 PM PST by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Dear Barney Frank,


This is not about the "couples." Marriage is to protect the Family, which means the children of a union between a man and a woman, so that they become healthy productive adults. That is the only way a society can survivel

For a group who say that the government has no business in their bedroom, they are demanding the government's blessing on their bedroom behavior.
20 posted on 11/18/2003 3:16:46 PM PST by maica (Leadership matters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-310 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson