KRUGMAN'S COVER If this isn't pure hate, what is?

andrewsullivan.com ^ | November 19, 2001

[Roscoe Karns]

KRUGMAN'S COVER: Check out the cover design of Paul Krugman's book in the UK. If this isn't pure hate, what is?

http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0713997435.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

[mylife]

More honest discourse from the lefties eh?

[mc5cents]

Pure liberalism. Pure and simple. Thats their world view. They don't know any other. It's sad in a way.

[lainie]

With a big ol' New York Times endorsement splashed across the front. yee haw

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Paul Krugman wants to be Michael Moore when he grows up.

[Prime Choice]

This book will, of course, be immediately reviewed by the New York Times.

...don't hold your breath for them to review any of Ann Coulter's books, though.

[moodyskeptic]

Oooh, classy.

[StriperSniper]

A bit incestuous huh? ;-)

[Poohbah]

Paul Krugman, paid $50,000 to shill Enron's stock and business model, has no business complaining about Enron

[ladyinred]

Sorry I looked.

[Michael Barnes]

Typical of a liberal..If you ever want to know what liberals are up to, listen to what their preaching. They HAVE to project whereas they are the ones wrapped up in sooo much shit. Scandalous? Hardly. X42, that was scandolous.

Love the Enron thing too,,They were preaching it loud and proud, right up until the point it started coming back home to roost.

[RaceBannon]

Pure hate?

All he did was copy pictures from one of our rallies, pics we took of the leftists!

[jackbill]

Who is Paul Crudman?

[dighton]

Paul Krugman, paid $50,000 to shill Enron's stock and business model ...

Damn. I thought Enron gave him money as a random act of kindness.

;-)

[dinok]

All of a sudden Michael Jackson's story is not so bad.

[aculeus]

Earlier thread.


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1024451/posts?page=31#31

[ysoitanly]

A lefty 'economist' and columnist who plays fast and loose with all of his 'facts'.

[TruthShallSetYouFree]

Okay, I have a question. I'm not being cute, clever or facetious. I really have a question.

The question, in a nutshell is:

Do democrats actually believe what they are saying?

Does Krugman, when he is about to fall asleep, really believe that Clinton caused a great economic boom that Bush destoyed in three years?

Seriously, when I argue with democrats, I believe strongly in what I am saying. I don't make stuff up just to prove a point. When I listen to Rush, or Sean, or Ann Coulter, I really believe that they believe what they are saying. Does that hold true for liberals?

[Redleg Duke]

"Ignore the economic recovery...pay attention to the man behind the curtin!"

[anoldafvet]

The only connection between Bush and Enron is that they are both from Texas. Bush had nothing to do with Enron except it was "outed" while he was president. Enron occured under and was sanctioned by Bill Clinton.