No, what's beyond the realm of believability is that the Clinton administration murdered a bunch of religious zealots and lied about it, and you are here defending the Clintonoids.
No, what's beyond the realm of believability is that the Clinton administration murdered a bunch of religious zealots and lied about it...It was an administration built on lies. It built the economic bubble on a foundation of lies regarding the worth of many public companies. (The press doesn't tell the story of the Clinton involvement in the bubble-build-up.) It lied about the need to go in to Kosovo. Clinton lied about what he was doing in the White House with young girls. Lied about it under oath. And Reno lied about the whole Waco operation.
I don't have any personal knowledge of what happened at Waco but I do know this: I do not trust that administration on that issue. I clearly remember the news shortly after the event and Janet Reno trying to distance herself from what happened and it wasn't her fault because she'd been nudged out of the loop by the good-old-boys in the FBI. What wasn't her fault? That the Davidians set the fire themselves? I remember the tone of the argument being much different. Reno was saying that the over-use of force was not her fault.
Now, it seems, history has been re-written. There was no over-use of force. Really, no force at all. Only the Davidians playing with matches, and as someone here pointed out, talking about it in very non-human ways ("do you have the fuel... do you have the fuel yet... do you have the fuel...").
The government version of that event reminds me much too much of the immortal words of the Leader of the Free World in the 1990s: I did not have sex with that woman.
You are in error on that point.
DO you even know who was in office when the original investigative work by the BATF of the Davidians was undertaken?
Once again, it appears some of you are not beyond 'making stuff up' to further your arguments, points or your 'attacks' on someone with a contrary argument or point and substantial supporting common sense, physical evidence and witness statements (including Davidians) to back up those points.