1 posted on
11/30/2003 5:56:01 PM PST by
mrustow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Peacerose; Timesink; *CCRM
Incoming!
2 posted on
11/30/2003 5:59:10 PM PST by
mrustow
(no tag)
To: MeeknMing; sweetliberty; Budge
PING!
3 posted on
11/30/2003 6:00:51 PM PST by
nicmarlo
To: mrustow
"Does the New York Times wish the President dead?"
I hate to even think such a thing, but it sure seems like a lot of liberals DO have some kind of death wish for President Bush!
4 posted on
11/30/2003 6:03:30 PM PST by
Maria S
("…the end is near…this time, Americans are serious; Bush is not like Clinton." Uday Hussein 4/9/03)
To: mrustow
People are perfectly capable of maintaining a confidence for security reasons. Perhaps they should tell Senator Leahy.
5 posted on
11/30/2003 6:04:52 PM PST by
LouD
(Otherwise they might actually nominate someone who could win...)
To: mrustow
The press would have deliberately leaked the info to the enemy's willing ear, waited for AF One to be shot down, and the eulegised Dubya as a lunatic for going to a war zone, and idolized their murdered collegues as heroes.
6 posted on
11/30/2003 6:12:11 PM PST by
Darksheare
(Even as we speak, my 100,000 killer wombat army marches forth)
To: mrustow
Does the New York Times Wish the President Dead?Absolutely yes.
The NY Times is run by sworn enemies of the United States. Traitors to their rotten core.
7 posted on
11/30/2003 6:13:19 PM PST by
FormerACLUmember
(A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.)
To: mrustow
The liberals want the economy to tank.
The liberals want us to pull out of Iraq and cede the country to the terrorists (Al Queda or the UN, take your pick).
The liberals want the media to breach security and put the President in jeopardy.
The liberals do NOT want us to question their "patriotism".
I think this sums up the liberal mind-set rather succinctly.
Leni
8 posted on
11/30/2003 6:13:59 PM PST by
MinuteGal
(Start saving your pesos for "FReeps Ahoy 3" in spring. Give each other a cruise for Christmas!)
To: mrustow
10 posted on
11/30/2003 6:24:20 PM PST by
Eala
(Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
To: mrustow
most Americans think the President is a pretty clever fellow, and that the people at the Times are the boobs.
this pretty much sum's up this great article.
11 posted on
11/30/2003 6:25:20 PM PST by
suzyq5558
(the nine dwarves= idiocrats on parade)
To: RansomOttawa
(At Free Republic, FReeper “RansomOttawa” overdosed on irony, challenging Taubman, “What are you going to do about it? Rescind his [Bush’s] Pulitzer Prize?”)Kudos! You're famous.
Prairie
12 posted on
11/30/2003 6:26:23 PM PST by
prairiebreeze
(Brought to you by The American Democratic Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
To: Mo1
ping re: our discussion of last night
Prairie
14 posted on
11/30/2003 6:28:22 PM PST by
prairiebreeze
(Brought to you by The American Democratic Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
To: mrustow
"Journalism" worldwide is effin' pathetic.
18 posted on
11/30/2003 6:33:12 PM PST by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
To: mrustow
The NY and LA Slimes
want all
nonglobalists dead and removed out of the way.
Their plan for 2/3 less population in the world sounds more and more real.
19 posted on
11/30/2003 6:33:39 PM PST by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: mrustow
Does the New York Times wish the President dead? Yes.
And the feeling is mutual.
20 posted on
11/30/2003 6:33:59 PM PST by
Old Sarge
(NYT = KBG (USA))
To: mrustow
LESS
SLAGGED
SLAVE/SERFS
are easier to manage for the globalist power mongers . . . among whom, Shrillery is one of the most rabid.
21 posted on
11/30/2003 6:34:41 PM PST by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: mrustow
Does the New York Times Wish the President Dead?Yes!
They would also wish everyone who voted for President Bush dead too.
23 posted on
11/30/2003 6:36:03 PM PST by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: mrustow
Toogood Reports really are! Excellent.
25 posted on
11/30/2003 6:39:24 PM PST by
arasina
(CHRISTMAS! [just try and take my tag line away, Bloomberg])
To: mrustow
It isn't just the President's life that would have been in danger if the trip had been announced. It would have been the troops on the ground trying to eat their Thanksgiving dinner. I think it is obvious it would've been a disaster. The jihadis would have had an enormous incentive to attack with great numbers all gatherings of troops everywhere in Iraq in the hopes of killing the President.
To: mrustow
Is this a rhetorical question? Of course they (the editorial board of the New York Times) do!
Mark
27 posted on
11/30/2003 6:49:21 PM PST by
MarkL
(Dammit Vermile!!!! I can't take any more of these close games! Chiefs 11-1!!! Woooo Hoooo!!!)
To: mrustow
Yes they do, and all the rest of the cowardly leftists do too. Oh yeah, you can darn well bet those gays that joined the Army just to get caught getting it on were not in an Infantry Basic Training. There wouldn't have been much left of them if they were. The sickness and depravity of the left amazes me.
29 posted on
11/30/2003 6:53:50 PM PST by
vpintheak
(Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
