Eisner's mishandling Roy Disney's tenure, tarnishing the Disney name, will reignite shareholders who are already miffed at Eisner and sued Mikey for packing the board with his minions.
1 posted on
12/01/2003 2:10:04 AM PST by
Liz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Liz
It had failed to bring the ABC television network's primetime schedule "back from the abyss", he wrote. Does anyone remember that summer some years back when the big idea at ABC for re-vamping their image was to emphasize a particular shade of yellow in all their ads?
That's the last idea I can associate with ABC.
(steely)
To: Liz
(Roy says company under Eisner "rapacious, soulless") And I say the sooner DisneyPervLand closes the better.
Walt Disney surely is rolling over in his grave at the rampant sights and sounds of everything from homosexuality to wholesale violence, murder, rape, and mayhem and immorality dripping from anything produced by Disney in 2003.
Disney productions is an ideal example of the current state of the great American void of morality and decency.
What they produce is not fit for adults, let alone toddlers learning to walk, talk, read, and write. They have left everything even resembling the ideals of wholesome family entertainment Walt Disney is so well remembered for.
Let them go away - far, far away!
3 posted on
12/01/2003 3:06:37 AM PST by
Happy2BMe
(2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
To: Liz
"A statement from the Disney board said Mr Disney had not been nominated for re-election to the board because of mandatory age limits. He is 73."
This is just plain ugly, even uglier coming from the Disney company. The "family entertainment" company is kicking "grandpa" off the board because he's old?
It's like little mikey is driving the wheelchair & dumping Roy over the cliff. Seeing as how mikey has a bum ticker, maybe he ought to be riding in the wheelchair instead of driving it.
But I don't think age is the real reason why mikey wants Roy gone. It's going to be interesting to watch how this plays out w/ stockholders.
6 posted on
12/01/2003 3:31:11 AM PST by
elli1
To: Liz
Before Eisner:
After Eisner:
7 posted on
12/01/2003 3:49:29 AM PST by
Byron_the_Aussie
(http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
To: Liz
The company was seen by virtually everyone associated with it as "rapacious, soulless, and always looking for a quick buck rather than long-term value," Mr Disney said. My feelings exactly.
Pixar is where Disney should be, not "Brother Bear."
10 posted on
12/01/2003 4:14:13 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: longfellow
11 posted on
12/01/2003 4:15:35 AM PST by
MinuteGal
(Start saving your pesos for "FReeps Ahoy 3" in spring. Give each other a cruise for Christmas!)
To: Liz
Eisner's been selling out the Disney brand for short term gain for along time now, anyone with two eyes that was willing to look at the company could tell you that. Its a shame that the stock holders and major shareholders have been so short sighted in this matter.
Eisner should have been gone a long long time ago, he has far outlasted his usefulness to the long term viability of the company.
Anyone could have made money by creating cheap capitalization of poorly produced cartoons and "sequels" of the existing catalog of Disney characters and products.... and make the quick buck now, but the inevitable outcome is a long term decline in the brands image and reputation.
Disney has without question gone from a respected world wide brand known for largely high quality family entertainment into just another entertainment giant out for the quick buck... and its truly a shame.
To: Liz
Anyone know what 'Bad Santa' did at the box office this weekend? Please tell me it bombed....
18 posted on
12/01/2003 4:55:22 AM PST by
Jhensy
To: Liz
bump
23 posted on
12/01/2003 5:09:27 AM PST by
PGalt
To: Liz
Excellent find. Although this should read:
"rapacious, lascivious, soulless, and always looking for a quick buck"
To: veronica; duckln; vollmond; Liz; churchillbuff; Mr. Bird
30 posted on
12/01/2003 5:43:32 AM PST by
EverFree
To: Liz
The minute Eisner is out Disney stock will go up like a rocket.
36 posted on
12/01/2003 6:31:10 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
To: Liz; ALOHA RONNIE
As the pink ribbon wearing and pushing Eisner forces Roy out of Disney, Roy decides to fight back.
Lets hope that the board forces Roy out and ignores him.
That will enable the vile super liberal, Eisner, to really disable Disney. Eventually that will get him fired.
If ABC/Jennings, Eisner can't enable $inator Hildebea$t or some other diseased RAT to be elected president, the big money people will pull the plug on ABC/JENNINGS/EISNER.
Eisner will be on the street shortly after GW is sworn in for his second term in 2005.
40 posted on
12/01/2003 8:21:40 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Sore@US, the Evil Daddy War bucks, has owned the Demonic Rats for decades!)
To: Liz
This article makes me even more proud of the fact that I'm the one of the few middle class parents in America who hasn't taken their kids to Disneyland or Disneyworld.
To: Liz
What a shame what Eisner had done with Disney.
43 posted on
12/01/2003 8:43:37 AM PST by
Dante3
To: Liz
Bump for later read.
51 posted on
12/01/2003 10:18:47 AM PST by
Lady Jag
(Googolplex Star Thinker of the Seventh Galaxy of Light and Ingenuity)
To: Liz; All
52 posted on
12/01/2003 10:25:51 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Sore@US, the Evil Daddy War bucks, has owned the Demonic Rats for decades!)
To: Liz
** company under Eisner "rapacious, soulless")**
Must agree with you. Something really terrible happened at Disney.
62 posted on
12/01/2003 5:18:41 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Liz
Gat a damn conservqative in there. You can't have somebody who hates what Walt built in there. Eisner is a deconstrunctionist, not a creator. They should also nix their deal with Miramax, Harvey is a RDDB with bank. He is pushing a far left agenda. He (at the behest of Bill and Hill) is now pushing Wes Clark, and has gotten Affleck and the other wind-up "actors" to jump on the bandwagon. J-lo is no doubt putting her assets behind the Clark campaign. Now Madonna (who also is a FOH) is pushing Clark. SCrew Harvey, Screw Clark, Screw the Clintons, Screw the FOHs and screw Eisner.
65 posted on
12/01/2003 8:02:05 PM PST by
faithincowboys
( Zell Miller is the only elected democrat in America who isn't committing treason.)
To: Liz
I don't know the ins andouts of this whole argument, but I wish that Mr. Disney had accused Eisner of perpetrating a fraud by applying the Disney name to movies and products that destroy our children's childhoods. I can no longer "blindly" take my grandchildren to see their movies, nor would I even suggest visiting their theme parks -- given the periodic "gay days" flaunted there.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson