Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ray Haynes: Schwarzenegger Learns How Democrats Negotiates
ChronWatch ^ | Dec. 18, 2003 | Ray Haynes

Posted on 12/17/2003 10:27:22 PM PST by FairOpinion

Governor Schwarzenegger learned an important lesson this last week. He came to Sacramento with a desire to ''negotiate'' a ''bipartisan'' solution to our budget crisis. He honestly believed that this ''bipartisan'' solution was possible. He even proposed a ''bipartisan'' solution to the crisis. The Democrats then threw his ''bipartisan'' solution in the trash can, and told the world he ''refused to negotiate.'' Welcome to Sacramento, Governor.

Let me explain.

For each of the past three years, Democrats have spent $8 billion more than they have received in revenue. In the 2001-02 budget, this was not a problem, because the state had four years of record surpluses. That surplus was burning a hole in the pockets of the Legislative Democrats, so they spent it as fast as it would come in, but even still, in June, 2001, the state ended the year with a $6 billion surplus.

That surplus didn't last long. By July of 2002, the state had spent the entire $6 billion, plus $2 billion more. By the end of the 2002-03 budget, the state had a $10.8 billion debt. That debt was financed with a one-year loan, due in May, 2004. In addition, the state owes the state employee pension fund (Cal-PERS) $2.5 billion that it cannot pay. To get state finances through 03-04 (the year the state is in now), and to get the debt off the books, the state borrowed $2.5 billion from the state pension fund, and approved a $10.8 billion bond to be sold as soon as possible. A court has recently ruled the pension loan illegal. Some believe the $10.8 billion bond is illegal, too.

The state is, therefore, faced with three options to deal with this accumulated debt: (1) raise taxes; (2) cut spending drastically; or (3) refinance the debt over a period of time longer than one year with voter approval (to remove any legal doubt). Schwarzenegger promised not to raise taxes, so he is left with two options. He chose the refinance option, mainly because the Democrats won't cut spending enough to pay off the $13.3 billion in debt we already owe. He said, however, that he would not borrow the money unless the state imposed a strict spending limit. Republicans reluctantly agreed to go along with the borrowing, if the spending limit was part of the deal.

The Democrats then complained about the bond. Now, wait a minute. You either cut programs to pay for this accumulated debt, or you borrow the money; the choice is one or the other, not inaction. The debt will come due, and the banks will get real unhappy if the state doesn't pay. The bond helps the Democrats avoid massive program cuts. Most Republicans I know want the cuts. The Democrats do not.

Republicans want the spending limit, since overspending got us into this mess in the first place. Schwarzenegger's plan bridged this partisan divide by giving the Democrats a way to protect their programs, and Republicans a way to swallow a bitter bond pill. The Republicans swallowed the pill, the Democrats whined.

That is how Democrats negotiate. We'll take what we want, they say, give you nothing of what you want, and then cry about how difficult you are to negotiate with. The lesson to the Governor should be: kick them first, just to get their attention, and then negotiate. In this case, the Governor started out with the best solution, in light of the depth of the problem. The Democrats, who created the problem, then sought to blame the whole thing on him, and then deny him a solution.

That is Sacramento under Democrat domination. Maybe, just maybe, the people will get the idea, and change the Legislature like they changed the Governor. One can only hope.

Ray Haynes represents the 56th Assembly District in the California Legislature.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; rayhaynes; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: sruleoflaw; Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson
From yesterday's thread:

"Please do not post to me in the future. I have no desire to communicate with you."

Read it. Know it. Live it.
61 posted on 12/18/2003 4:17:52 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: XBob
I didn't bring it up -- others try to trick me into revealing information about myself, but I prefer to keep it private. But I am generously revealing my opinions, which is what message boards are about.

Some people are comfortable telling everyone everything about themselves -- or make up a person they want others think they are.

To each his own.

And something to always keep in mind:

Now you can have fun, trying to guess, whether I am someone's Rottweiler, pet poodle, Siamese cat or pet parakeet. You can try going house to house in LA to find me. ;)

62 posted on 12/18/2003 9:15:06 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
TEXAS WOMEN!

http://www.my.homewithgod.com/rayc/txwomen.htm

Now you run along, Sugah, and send this to some girls who were raised in Texas or wish they had been.

If you're a male, you hug that Texas woman of yours and say "I'm a lucky man" 3 times out loud.

If you're a transplant....... FAKE it....we know you got here as fast as you could.

===

Now we know - Los Angeles - that's where we send our blond bubble headed women rejects. Land of the beautiful bimbos.

No wonder you think of yourself as a 'pet' or a 'dog', if you are trying to compete against them.

Get a boost in your self esteme (first) and then come to Texas (you seem smart enough), or our Texas women will run right over you.

We really love our 'dogs' here in Texas.

And we attract fine women like Barbara Bush (a gotsmart NY yankee woman), and grow them here - like Texas native Laura Bush. Occasionally some of our fine women do escape to bubble head land in LA (like Farrah Fawcett), but most either stay or come back, as all the Bush women have/will.

63 posted on 12/18/2003 1:08:18 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: XBob
I don't see much point in continuing this off-topic discussion. Suffice it to say:

I figured you'll take that cartoon the wrong way -- it's a classic from the New Yorker. No matter. The point was you can't believe anything anyone tells you over the internet.

Maybe I am a guy and if I got all indignant about "how dare you think I am a woman" I would let everyone know I am a guy, or claim to be. Or if I were a woman, and start defending myself against some of the statements you made, designed to elicite a reaction, --- again, I would be letting everyone know that I claim to be a woman.

You can also think of me as a disembodied spirit from the 5th dimension, or a Martian with a good antenna doing research on Earth people. ;)

Well, you can feel free to speculate, guess, think you know, and have any opinion about me you wish. Another nice thing about the internet.

I do not wish to tell people about myself, I also don't like to make things up, so the alternative is exactly what I am doing -- talking about everything, but myself.

Discussion on the topic of me is considered closed.
64 posted on 12/18/2003 1:43:28 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; XBob
Who cares if FairO is a man or a woman?
What counts is, he/she's an intelligent HUMAN.

If you don't like the message, don't take a pot shot
over what he/she seemingly is or is not ...

Argue the facts, or the logic refute,
But please won't you cease all the gender dispute?









65 posted on 12/19/2003 12:26:12 AM PST by b9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: doodlelady
"Argue the facts, or the logic refute, "

==

Hi, doodlelady! :)

In general, people who can't discuss issues, facts and logic, are the ones who make personal comments.
66 posted on 12/19/2003 12:39:39 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Hello, FairOne =)

So good to be back after weeks of reprieve...
These nasty attacks I just couldn't believe.

You're so right... it's the tactics of arguments weak,
to 'name call' and attempt to provoke and to tweak.

But your strength and demeanor inspires the wise...
I'm glad you don't mind standing up to those guys!!!
67 posted on 12/19/2003 12:59:23 AM PST by b9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
You're talking a little heat here....

But the help you are getting is forgeting to mention something.. When/IF Arnie fails ALL Republicans will get blamed. Did I ALL.?... Such a schomozle as Arnie only comes around ever so often.. The entire democrat infrastructre is salivating like vampire bats at the thought of it.. and are organizing with the cunning of wolves.. for that is what they are parasites on the state and national treasurys). Farmers they ain't..

I know, many here know, the democrats know,,, you are the only one(on this thread) that does'nt know.. Pity...

** Schomozle= not the one that gets drinks spilled on them but the one spilling the drink...

68 posted on 12/19/2003 1:32:19 AM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson