Posted on 12/29/2003 2:38:03 PM PST by Indy Pendance
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A company developing security technology for electronic voting suffered an embarrassing hacker break-in that executives think was tied to the rancorous debate over the safety of casting ballots online.
VoteHere Inc. of Bellevue, Wash., confirmed Monday that U.S. authorities are investigating a break-in of its computers months ago, when someone roamed its internal computer network. The intruder accessed internal documents and may have copied sensitive software blueprints that the company planned eventually to disclose publicly.
Chief executive Jim Adler said VoteHere was confident it knew the identity of its hacker and had already turned over "megabytes of evidence" to the FBI and Secret Service. It also repaired the hole in its computer network the intruder used to gain entry in October over the Internet, he said.
U.S. authorities confirmed the investigation but declined to comment further.
Adler would not identify the company's chief suspect but said he thinks the person was linked to the debate over the security of electronic voting. The same individual may be tied to the theft in March of internal documents from Diebold Election Systems of Canton, Ohio.
"We caught the intruder, identified him by name. We know where he lives," Adler said. "We think this is political. There have been break-ins around election companies over the last several months, and we think this is related."
VoteHere, which is privately held, disclosed the federal investigation to stress that the break-in did not affect the integrity of its voting technology, Adler said. The company also wanted to pre-empt any criticisms of electronic voting based on public disclosures of its internal records.
"I have no problem debating the merits of electronic voting with anyone, but breaking and entering is not an appropriate forum for technology debate," Adler said.
Adler said the intruder accessed internal corporate documents and may have copied sensitive "source code," blueprints for software. But Adler said VoteHere planned eventually to reveal that source code, which is protected under patents, for review by outside security researchers.
"Given the political sensitivity to this issue, we felt it was important to get out on this," Adler said.
"I have no problem debating the merits of electronic voting with anyone, but breaking and entering is not an appropriate forum for technology debate," Adler said.
Gee, I thought the technology was to be 'fool-proof'. This is PRECISELY what we have been claiming IS a major weakness. And this is why it is SO INSANE for these companies to refuse to have simultaneous anonymous date-stamped hard-copy paper printout/'receipt' for votes cast... It means that the fraud which could easily be perpetrated by a hacker...will go undetected...or if detected, uncorrectable.
Gore Wins 2000 Election by a Landslide!
Liberal Democrat Heaven. They've been pushing toward this for years.
Not necessarily. All one would have to do would be to insert a 'backdoor' into the firmware that's going to be put into the machines.
Of course there is, and most of us here understand that. However, when their website is hacked (and there are security protocols that will prevent that if followed), it certainly does not instill confidence in their ability to prevent software/machine manipulation during actual voting.
Sure you did guys!
You think you know where I live.....Start looking under rocks!!
We exist...despite your puny attempts to silence us !! We shall prevail...regardless of any methods used to silence us in the media.
All of you are doomed!!!
...until we swear in the rightful President of the United states...Pat Paulsen.
There are means by which the use of automation in combination with physical ballots could make elections more fraud-resistant than hand-counted paper ballots, but for some reason such means haven't been used. Perhaps some haven't been considered because nobody thought of them, but there does seem to be a preference for means that allow insider fraud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.