Posted on 12/29/2003 7:14:01 PM PST by Fat Kid NW
Edited on 12/29/2003 7:54:17 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
Okay, so I thought that I could at least have civil debate with INTELLIGENT conservatives, but after posting under a different name, not only were the responses the equivellant of "UH-UH," but I was denied my rights as a citizen of this great country. It appears to me that Free Republic is not interested in FREE SPEECH! I do love the U.S., I just disagree with the jingoism that followed 9/11. I disagree with our leaders purposfully lying to their citizens in order to go to war. I disagree with going to war against the express directions of the UN which was made to council the nations on these issues. I disagree with the nation's presidency being stolen from the rightful owner, the man who truly won the election. I disagree with that stolen presidency being handed to a C average student who has a criminal record and went AWOL when he was supposed to be serving in the military. I disagree with corporations running the government in the new era of pay to play politics. I disagree with the same corporations that run the country, run the news media. I disagree with conservatives instead of listening to what a liberal has to say, they resort to attacking them with (sometimes) drastic immaturity. I disagree with using religion to get votes. I disagree with religion. I disagree with history being written by the victors. I disagree with with the USA PATRIOT Act not only because anyone can be detained for any reason for any amount of time without a trial with a jury of twelve peers. I disagree with the fact it is called the "Patriot Act" and yet there is nothing patriotic about it. I DO agree with the quote "If you are willing to sacrifice freedom for for security, you deserve neither." I disagree with the civilians in this country not standing up and calling for an impeachment for a president that has done far worse than getting a blow job in the oval office. He has LIED, CHEATED, AND MURDERED. I disagree with everyone being angry at Bill Clinton for smoking marijuana but no one criticizes George W. Bush for DRUNK DRIVING and COCAINE use. I disagree with George W. Bush saying in a nationally televised broadcast, "If you aren't with us, you're with the terrorists." This hurt the feelings of about 60% of New York citizens because they not only lost friends and family in the World Trade Center on 9/11, but they also opposed going to war with Iraq. You can imagine the deranged ultimatum this put on those poor Ameericans who had to choose between those who killed their friends and family and the their better judgment to wait for a UN resolution. I disagree with a $350 billion tax that goes directly to the 1% minority of the wealthy. I disagree with the "No Child Left Behind" policy. Standardized tests don't teach children anything but how to memorize test questions. As a teacher, I can only describe it as leaving every child behind. I disagree with arch conservatives on this website saying that I have AIDS because I am liberal and am into homosexual activites. To clear up your mislead statements of slander. I am heterosexual, I do not have AIDS. I have two healthy children that are beautiful and will be entering school in a year. I love my wife and my country. I don't agree with you...but that doesn't mean I hate you or your thoughts. I encourage them. But please stop reacting to someone that you disagree with in an angry passion of blind ignorance. It doesn't solve anything.
Council kid, not dictate. The sovereignty of any nation is not subservient to the will of the UN general assembly, never has been and never will or should be.
Why should the US fold to the pressures of the nations who unleashed the 3 great anticrhists on the world? Russia, Germany and France? Europe has a horrible track record when it comes to dealing with despots... they always go the route of appeasement and sooner or later we have to go in and clean up the mess their failed policies cause.
You are welcome to disagree, but if you think the US should be subservient to the UN defacto, and that US sovereignty ends when teh UN says something different than what our nations leaders decide, then frankly you are a traitor... you have decided that your nations sovereignty is subservient to another entity of man, and that sir frankly makes you a traitor.
This statement worried me the most- someone THIS STUPID is teach our children. He says he has little kids so I am guessing still under age 30- so a Gen-X er (by definition brainless know-nothings)
For the "Fat Kid"
"Yes, young troll, your feeble skills are no
match for the power of the right side."
Verrrrry interesting... but stupit!
You're a teacher!?
Your a non-spelling idiot...
This may be the scariest part of the whole post!
Mark
On the contrary. He has been commensurrately chastised and punished. He has shown contrition for his wrongs and corrected them. Has Mr. Clinton?
Funny how those on the left refused to accept all of the statements made about Bill Clinton's own cocaine use (and possible heart attack). Even his own half brother said that he had a nose like a vaccuum cleaner.
The allegation against George Bush came from an anonymous source in a book authored by a guy who wrote unauthorized biographies of Star Trek actors. That author has since committed suicide.
Regardless of the truth or fiction of George W. Bush's cocaine use/abuse, I am certain that he is clean and sober today. There are still suspicions that Bill Clinton continues to use cocaine.
As to the drunk driving, it is known that Ted Kennedy killed more people driving drunk than George W. Bush (1 to 0). Ted Kennedy gets a pass on this; he even waited before getting "aid" for his campaign aide lady friend. George W. Bush paid his fine (the penalty for the crime at the time). How much jail time did Ted Kennedy get?
ha.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.