Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Don Feder] Film of the Year: The Return of the King
Front Page Magazine ^ | 12/31/03 | Don Feder

Posted on 12/31/2003 4:35:26 AM PST by rhema

The final installment of Peter Jackson’s stunning screen adaptation of J.R.R Tolkien’s "Lord of the Rings" – "The Return of The King" -- premiered on December 17th. Not surprisingly, it had the highest first 5-days box office in history ($246 million worldwide).

Since its publication in Britain (1954-1955), Tolkien’s Trilogy – as fans reverently refer to the epic – sold over 50 million copies, and that was before the release of Jackson’s movies, which naturally spurred sales of the books.

Such is the author’s popularity that a Lycos word search of J.R.R. Tolkien turns up over 2 million entries, compared to less than half that number for his slightly more famous countryman, Winston Spencer Churchill.

How to account for the popularity of the films? Of course there’s the rousing adventure yarn -- set in a fantasy world of elves, dwarfs, hobbits, Ents (giant, sentient creatures that resemble trees), orcs (rather a cross between a troll with a really bad hair day and Barbra Streisand) and other mythical creatures.

The battle scenes beggar the word spectacular – Agincourt meets Hans Christian Andersen. Only the wizardry of computer animation could do justice to Tolkien’s vision.

But that’s far from all.

The Lord of The Rings (books and movies), and especially "The Return of the King," is about the struggle of good and evil – a dark lord of supernatural malevolence intent on crushing free will and enslaving humanity, a ring of power which corrupts those who possess it and therefore must be destroyed, courageous warriors, a wise and benevolent wizard, and ordinary folk (represented by the prosaic Hobbits) who – through their sacrifices – rise to heroic heights.

It’s a morality tale especially suited to our times. Like the inhabitants of Middle Earth, we too confront a spreading shadow ("One ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them, in the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.") Our Shadow isn’t the Dark Lord Sauron, but an equally demonic force variously designated terrorism, fanaticism or Islamicism. It is anti-Western, anti-human rights and (ultimately) anti-humanity.

The struggle against this Dark Lord has also shown us unparalleled heroism by ordinary people – firefighters and police, soldiers and citizens. (One thinks of the noble Todd Beamer of "Let’s roll" fame.)

Not many of those flocking to "The Return of the King" know much about the author of Middle Earth. A few would identify Tolkien as an Englishman. Fewer still know he was an Oxford don and a traditional Catholic. But in Tolkien’s life and worldview lie the roots of his trilogy.

Born in 1892, John Ronald Reuel Tolkien was a product of the Victorian era. He studied at Oxford from 1908 and served in the First World War, where he endured combat on the Somme and returned home suffering from shell shock. The blasted land of Mordor of "The Lord of The Rings" probably was conceived in No-Man’s-Land on the Western Front.

Tolkien became a professor of Anglo-Saxon at Oxford in 1925, and was appointed Merton Professor of English at the college in 1945, retiring in 1959.

The author’s Catholicism and arch-conservatism were instrumental in shaping his opus. (During the World War II Blitz, the author kept a rosary next to his bed)

His Oxford friends included fellow don C.S. Lewis, author of "The Chronicles of Narnia." When they met, Lewis was a skeptic. Tolkien has the distinction of bringing back to the Christian fold the greatest Christian apologist of the 20th century.

Although he loathed allegory, Tolkien wrote in a 1953 letter to Fr. Robert Murray: "’The Lord of the Rings’ is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work; unconsciously so at first, but consciously in the revision."

Tolkien believed that mythology was primarily a moral medium -- that through fairy tales great lessons are imparted. Thus, the architect of Middle Earth wrote, "There is indeed no better medium for moral teaching than the good Fairy-story (by which I mean a real deep-rooted tale, told as a tale, and not a thinly disguised moral allegory)."

As Hillsdale College Professor Bradley J. Birzer explains in his book "J.R.R. Tolkien’s Sanctifying Myth" (ISI Books -- 2002), "Tolkien believed that myth can teach men and women how to be fully men and women, not mere cogs in the vast machine of modern industrial society."

Perhaps that’s why Tolkien’s mythology has such powerful appeal in today’s world of global conglomerates, mass movements, mass media and information technology.

In "The Lord of The Rings" Tolkien dealt with such paramount matters as corruption of the soul, temptation, the will to power, mercy, forgiveness, redemption and salvation. He did so brilliantly, with prose that sears the soul like an incandescent blade.

Tolkien also wrestled with the 20th century – an era that brought previously unimagined material and scientific progress, but also untold suffering and unspeakable horrors. Tens of millions died in wars fostered by obscene dogmas, millions of others were murdered to advance grand utopian schemes. This is the century gave us secret police, torture cells, death camps, political propaganda and causes that substituted leaders and ideologies (the church of race or the church of the proletariat) for God.

Tolkien believed that the only way to combat this slide to technological barbarism is for people to rediscover their essence – to know that each of us has a divine spark within, to understand that history isn’t shaped by relentless forces but is the product of individuals with a vision (angelic or demonic), and that we are not "mere cogs in the vast machine of modern industrial society" but sub-creators, whose works can reflect the glory of the ultimate Creator. As the wizard Gandalf proclaims when he confronts the monstrous Balrog in Moria: "I am a servant of the Secret Fire!" So too was Tolkien. And so should we all be, the author implies.

Finally, "The Lord of the Rings" is about faith – faith that moves the weary footsteps of two dispirited hobbits toward the appropriately named Mt. Doom and what they believe will be their certain doom, faith that keeps the men of Gondor on the battlements fighting insurmountable odds, faith that gives Aragon the strength to lead when all seems hopeless.

While religion is pervasive in "The Lord of The Rings," it is never overt. We never see characters involved in worship. With one exception, there are no references to an afterlife.

But religion is there in the Hobbits’ sense of wonder, in charity in unforeseen places, in heroism from unlikely sources and in the white magic of the Elves (especially Galadriel, the Elf lady of Lothlorien).

Galadriel bestows parting gifts on the members of the fellowship. To Frodo she gives a crystal phial, wherein "is caught the light of Earendil’s star …. May it be a light to you in dark places, when all other lights go out." In the Bible, light symbolizes knowledge – especially the knowledge of God.

Jackson’s films are surprisingly true to Tolkien’s vision. Even more, in some instances, they add a subtle emphasis to what was only hinted at in the books.

In the first movie, when the fellowship leaves Lothlorien, Galadriel is standing on the shore with her hand raised in a serene gesture of farewell as the company paddle away. Dressed in white with a hood framing her head, shining with an inner radiance, she looks like the perfect Madonna figure.

Tolkien feared the age of heroes had passed – that what he saw as the ant-hill society of modernity, and a culture that washed all of the poetry, splendor and joy out of life, had made heroism on an epic scale impossible.

But the response to his books – and Jackson’s films – shows there is a genuine hunger for heroes and a yearning for the transcendent. Along with the capture of Saddam – the Shadow of Baghdad – "The Return of The King" is one of the most hopeful developments of 2003. And, fittingly, it comes in a season of hope – when mankind’s steps are illuminated by the Star of Bethlehem or the light of the menorah.

Don Feder is a former Boston Herald writer who's currently the host of a talk show on WTTT 1150Am in Boston, M-F, 6-9am.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 2003review; donfeder; lordoftherings; lotr; media; moviereview; tolkien
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 12/31/2003 4:35:27 AM PST by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BibChr; logos; The Big Econ; Caleb1411
How good it is to seen Don Feder in print again.
2 posted on 12/31/2003 4:38:13 AM PST by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
Ping!
3 posted on 12/31/2003 4:51:55 AM PST by Lil'freeper (By all that we hold dear on this good Earth I bid you stand, men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Thats a pretty good take on it, IMO.
4 posted on 12/31/2003 4:55:18 AM PST by The G Man (Wesley Clark is just Howard Dean in combat boots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Personally My vote for best picture


SeaBiscuit!!!..................and their off!
5 posted on 12/31/2003 5:23:16 AM PST by chicagolady (Jesus, Be my Magnificent Obsession)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
orcs (rather a cross between a troll with a really bad hair day and Barbra Streisand)

LOL

6 posted on 12/31/2003 5:26:21 AM PST by Ladysmith (Back at it! Low-carbing and working out hard! (232.5 (-28.1)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
While Tolikien´s faith certainly shaped his vision of Middle Earth, he was foremost a philologist, the world´s foremost authority on Beowulf, and one of the greatest scholars of Old English and the Anglo-Saxon people. His purpose in writing the trilogy and The Silmarillion, was to re-create a "lost mythology" of the Anglo-Saxon people. His faith, his experiences in WWI, and his environmentalism/ruralism were all displayed in his works, but it was his love of language and his English heritage which spurred him to write.
7 posted on 12/31/2003 5:36:47 AM PST by jaime1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jaime1959
Although he loathed allegory, Tolkien wrote in a 1953 letter to Fr. Robert Murray: "The Lord of the Rings" is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work; unconsciously so at first, but consciously in the revision."

I came to that conclusion as well, but the above statement seems to indicate otherwise.

Looks like more research is in order...

8 posted on 12/31/2003 5:44:58 AM PST by Damocles (sword of...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Movies in which ordinary, even flawed people triumph over evil and/or tremendous adversity usually are big hits.

The LOR movie trilogy will stand as one of the greatest artisitic accomplishments of our time. I am sorry it is over as I enjoyed it thoroughly.
9 posted on 12/31/2003 5:54:47 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
His Oxford friends included fellow don C.S. Lewis, author of "The Chronicles of Narnia." When they met, Lewis was a skeptic. Tolkien has the distinction of bringing back to the Christian fold the greatest Christian apologist of the 20th century.

I don't remember Lewis crediting Tolkien with this.
10 posted on 12/31/2003 6:01:45 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
His Oxford friends included fellow don C.S. Lewis, author of "The Chronicles of Narnia."

And Out of the Silent Planet, Perelandra, and That Hideous Strength, his adult science fiction trilogy still in print, as well as a whole bunch of other thoroughly fantastic books.
11 posted on 12/31/2003 6:03:59 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
...orcs (rather a cross between a troll with a really bad hair day and Barbra Streisand)....

Gotta love Don Feder, sort of a male Ann Coulter.

Ping the gang?

Dan

12 posted on 12/31/2003 6:06:24 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
Ping the Ringers?
13 posted on 12/31/2003 6:09:23 AM PST by ItsOurTimeNow (Criswell - "And remember, my friends, future events such as these will affect you in the future.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Damocles
Although he loathed allegory, Tolkien wrote in a 1953 letter to Fr. Robert Murray: "The Lord of the Rings" is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work; unconsciously so at first, but consciously in the revision."

That does it

If this becomes public then the left wing reviwers will all of a sudden find a reason to pan the movie
14 posted on 12/31/2003 6:09:40 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rhema
He was out of print?
15 posted on 12/31/2003 6:10:28 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom; 300winmag; Alkhin; Alouette; ambrose; Anitius Severinus Boethius; artios; AUsome Joy; ...

Ring Ping!!
There and Back Again: The Journeys of Flat Frodo

Anyone wishing to be added to or removed from the Ring-Ping list, please don't hesitate to let me know.

16 posted on 12/31/2003 6:12:59 AM PST by ecurbh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Damocles
I appreciate your honesty with his statement. I see so many (inluding Ian McKellen) scoffing at any religious overtones in LOTR — in which case they are, in effect, disagreeing with the author himself!

And I say this as one myself who, though both a Christian and a multi-decade reader of LOTR, has never been overwhelmed by anything religious in LOTR. I've come to see that it must be mostly in the moral and teleological fabric of Tolkien's universe. There are, as well, a few more overt statements sprinked here and there, and more so in the Silmarillion — or in the portion I've been able to labor through!

Dan
17 posted on 12/31/2003 6:13:50 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Those three are really something. I took a while to warm to the third, but the second is gripping and highly imaginative. The first is just fun.

Dan
18 posted on 12/31/2003 6:14:47 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
I enjoyed how each of them is so different from the others, but especially the way they all show that there is more to this world than meets the eye. Lewis was right on, wasn't he, about the modern mindset tending to totalitarianism? The one book I had the hardest time reading, the first time, was Till We Have Faces. Several years later, in college, I tried it again and found it to be excellent. Have you read Light in the Shadowlands: Protecting the Real C. S. Lewis, an expanded version of The C.S. Lewis Hoax by Kathryn Lindskoog?
19 posted on 12/31/2003 6:24:02 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Tolkein was an influence, among many. "...Bringing back to the...fold" is too strong.
20 posted on 12/31/2003 6:24:06 AM PST by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson