Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Egypt Airliner CRASHED in Egypt - A final update on root cause analysis? Technical Fault Blamed
Various | 1/3/2004 | ME

Posted on 01/03/2004 4:50:17 AM PST by Gorons

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-186 next last
To: _Jim
Thank you.
61 posted on 01/03/2004 5:42:23 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: thesummerwind
FoxNews still not mentioning this CRASH.

Oh, horrors.

This 'news', BTW, is all over GOOGLE NEWS though.

REAL effective 'coverup' huh?

62 posted on 01/03/2004 5:42:52 AM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel; Gorons; _Jim; weegee; billorites; Lazamataz; Straight Pipes; Conspiracy Guy; ...
Of course it would be a "technical fault", and therefore not newsworthy.

It was probably the same as that out-of-control food cart that rolled down the ailse to the back of Flight 587 and destroyed the tailfin!

This is just another coverup once more, and FoxNews is talking about Bruce Willis' fashion sense, Fear Factor, and celebrity poker.

What a world!!! And the people sleep.

ALERT --- FoxNews is talking about it now --technical malfunction! -- a seven second news piece! Yeh, that food cart again.

63 posted on 01/03/2004 5:44:37 AM PST by thesummerwind (Images of broken light which dance before me like a million eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Gorons
where the water is hundreds of meters (feet) deep --

Imagine how surprised they will be when they realize that a meter is more than a YARD long and not a "feet (foot)" as reported.

64 posted on 01/03/2004 5:47:37 AM PST by Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toskrin
The officials said it's not a conspiracy, so it must be a conspiracy!

What official mentioned "conspiracy"? Got an answer?

Every time people like you introduce the word, "conspiracy" to a discussion, you do so to bring illegitamacy to others' concerns. Real lame on your part.

65 posted on 01/03/2004 5:49:30 AM PST by thesummerwind (Images of broken light which dance before me like a million eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
sounds like a bomb

I think that's pretty standard for airplane crashes. The aluminum fuselage basically turns into a blender upon impact.

66 posted on 01/03/2004 5:49:32 AM PST by Henk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
"There is no sign of terrorism."

Sheesh. Accident investigations take months to complete!

Good grief. The Egyptians are so quick to end this inquirey before it has even begun.

Not to mention that when an Air Egypt Islamic maniac pilot T-handled both engines and aimed for the ocean (and said on the CVR recorded the struggle between him and the captain!!!) the Egyptians would not believe the facts.

67 posted on 01/03/2004 5:49:49 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Thank you.

You're welcome.

I'm fully willing to accept any conclusion in the final analysis so long as it's based on *all* the evidence (not just a 'conspiratorial excerpt' that supports some pet theory) utilizing the latest scientific processing/processes for (for evidence processing) and sound analysis of that evidence by a competent, assembled board of seasoned aeronautical experts.

68 posted on 01/03/2004 5:49:57 AM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Toskrin
Here's a simple explanation - they don't think it's worth reporting until they get more facts.

Now that is a reasonable suggestion.

But as I said, this same news coverage pattern occurred when Flight 587 went down in New York. Blair was there and there is so much more, but my bet is on terrorism, and the French and Egyptians will most likely not admit it for fear of losing tourist $$$$'s.

We'll see, or maybe we won't see. Do you have conclusions on Flight 800, by the way?

69 posted on 01/03/2004 5:54:11 AM PST by thesummerwind (Images of broken light which dance before me like a million eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

To: longjack
Didn't the first reports say there was no indication from the plane that there was a problem?

Yes, and those reports have been deep-sixed, just like the original eye witness reports in New York with Flight 587. First witnesses then reported an explosion AWAY from the tail, and then, all of a sudden, their reports disappeared. I watched the whole sequence of coverage that morning. This is identical!!! This is classic coverup, IMO.

71 posted on 01/03/2004 5:58:42 AM PST by thesummerwind (Images of broken light which dance before me like a million eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Tycobb
No eye-witness reports of an explosion or surface-to-air missile.

No sounds of an explosion.

No significant number of the enemies of Al-Qaida (or is France on their doo-doo list, now?) on board.

No groups taking credit for the crash.

No dancing in the streets.

None of the things we expect to see when terrorism is involved.

We need to wait for the black boxes or more info before we can even start guessing.
72 posted on 01/03/2004 5:58:50 AM PST by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: seamole
"Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung" is saying the same thing. This is the lead paragraph:


excerpt..

3 January 2004: A technical breakdown caused the plane crash with 148 deaths in Egypt, according to information from the Deputy French Minister of Transport Dominique Bussereau. Shortly after takeoff the plane had a "problem" said Bussereau in Paris on Saturday. The plane crashed into the Red Sea in the attempt to return to the airport at Scharm Al Scheich.

"Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung"....Boeing mit Touristen abgestürzt - 148 Tote

Translated by longjack

P.S. Thanks for bumping the first post to the other thread.

73 posted on 01/03/2004 6:01:25 AM PST by longjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: seamole
The flight had a problem on takeoff .........I'd say so.
74 posted on 01/03/2004 6:01:52 AM PST by thesummerwind (Images of broken light which dance before me like a million eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Yeh .... the old fog thing! Nah!
75 posted on 01/03/2004 6:02:33 AM PST by thesummerwind (Images of broken light which dance before me like a million eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
They won't wait for all the evidence. read the papers on Sunday... watch TV News.... "an apparent technical malfunction caused the plane..."
76 posted on 01/03/2004 6:05:31 AM PST by GeronL (The French just can't stop being French.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: seamole; ecru; 2sheep; Jeremiah Jr; brigette; AnnaZ; Yehuda; Alouette; dennisw
French anti-terrorism authorities in Paris said they did not expect to open an investigation, since the crash appears to be an accident.

Looks like they are jumping to conclusions before the facts are in. That's okay, apparently, if one says, "nothing to see here just move along." Just don't think it *might* be terrorism, and you're alright.

Looks like these folks departed Egypt in a Flash, yet they drowned in the Red Sea.

An undated handout picture taken at the Roissy airport, north of Paris, shows a Boing 737 belonging to the private Egyptian company Flash Airlines. A charter plane of the egyptian company carrying mostly French tourists has crashed in the Red Sea, 03 January 2004 near Sharm-el-Sheikh. The passengers and crew were killed in the crash.(AFP-HO)

77 posted on 01/03/2004 6:07:14 AM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #78 Removed by Moderator

To: thesummerwind
Many TWA 800 conspiracy theories were lent a bit of credibility after Stephanopoulis' infamous live comment on September 11:

"There are facilities in the White House, not the normal situation room, which everyone has seen in the past, has seen pictures of. There is a second situation room, behind the primary situation room, which has video conferencing capabilities. The director of the Pentagon, the defense chief, can speak from a national military command center at the Pentagon. The Secretary of State can speak from the State Department, the President from wherever he is, and they'll have this capability for video conferencing throughout this crisis." "In my time at the White House it was used in the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing, in the aftermath of the TWA Flight 800 bombing, and that would be the way they would stay in contact through the afternoon."

79 posted on 01/03/2004 6:08:07 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Quilla; _Jim
Sweet Jim is one of those even-tempered, level-headed folks who we should all bow to at times such as this, don't you know? He may just be related to Arlen 'Scottish Law/Single Bullet' Spector afterall. He notes coyly that no one should "jump to confusion." Isn't he wise?
80 posted on 01/03/2004 6:09:00 AM PST by thesummerwind (Images of broken light which dance before me like a million eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson