Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are You Going To Get Mad?
Charley Reese ^ | 1-24-2004 | Charley Reese

Posted on 01/20/2004 9:33:48 PM PST by TomHolly

Are You Going To Get Mad?

It is now about as clear as it's going to get that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction. Secretary of State Colin Powell even contradicted himself (in his U.N. speech) by admitting recently that there is no evidence of any link between Saddam and al-Qaida.

Prior to the Iraq War, the Bush administration asserted as fact that Saddam had huge quantities of chemical and biological weapons and was actively pursuing nuclear weapons. Administration members ridiculed people who expressed any doubts. Today, after spending millions of dollars looking for the weapons, they haven't found anything. And every Iraqi official captured, none of whom has any reason at all to lie, has said the same thing: There are no weapons of mass destruction.

In fact, the Iraqis had been saying that for years, and the Bush administration replied, "You're lying." Now we have this situation. The facts on the ground prove that the Iraqis, whom President Bush called liars, were telling the truth. What does that make Bush? It makes Bush either very badly mistaken or a liar.

It seems to me that if Bush were merely mistaken, he would admit it. He would say to the American people: "Look, I thought Iraq had those weapons based on intelligence, but apparently the intelligence was wrong. I apologize for misleading you." But the president will not do that. He gets huffy and defensive when asked about weapons of mass destruction. Before the war, he never opened his mouth without talking about weapons of mass destruction. It might be that there is simply an arrogant gene in the Bush family. It might be that he was just lying.

It is true that the intelligence reports contained a lot of reservations, expressions of doubt and uncertainty, but when this came out of the political process, it was told to the American people as unquestionable fact without reservations. "Intelligence gathered by this government and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and to conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised," Bush said on March 17. All the Bush people were asserting this to be a fact.

Now we have nearly 500 dead Americans who died to protect the United States from weapons that don't exist. And more will die, and for what reason? So Halliburton and other big corporations can make a lot of money? So Israel can feel safer? So we can have permanent military bases in Iraq? So the president can strut about and call himself the Conqueror of Iraq? One thing you can be sure of: They won't die defending the United States, because Iraq is not now and never was a threat to the United States.

It's no wonder Bush avoids military funerals and has barred the press from the airport where our dead come home. It's no wonder he has clamped a lid of secrecy on the search for weapons of mass destruction. What he ought to do is write a letter of apology to the families of every dead and wounded soldier. That'll be the day.

I don't know about you, but I'm damned angry that the president took this country to war on false pretenses. He has now dreamed up all these other reasons for going to war, but he sold this war to Congress and to the American people on the basis that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

This is far more serious than anything Bill Clinton did. He lied about dillydallying with a young girl. This president apparently lied about the reasons he wanted to take this country to war. He is, behind his facade of good old boy, apparently a man so arrogant that he does not think the American people deserve to be told the truth.

Maybe he's right. If the American people are not offended enough to throw him out of office, then apparently — in this country, anyway — the truth no longer matters.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © 2003 by King Features Syndicate, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: antisemite; breachbirthanoxia; charleyreese; cuckoocharley; exhale; heretodaygonetoday; higherthanakite; inhale; kittenchow; kneepadbrigade; litemydoobie; lovedclintonswars; ozonealert; passthebong; pos; reese; saddamite; sandwichshyofpicnic; sorrycharley; syphilliticdementia; takeyourmeds; tinfoil; welcometofr; wmd; zot; zotforbrains
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last
To: fatima
It's been a long time since I've seen a live ZOT!

Here kitty, kitty, kitty!
41 posted on 01/20/2004 10:03:24 PM PST by Jen (The FReeperette formerly known as AntiJen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TomHolly


DU Troll since 1/20/04
42 posted on 01/20/2004 10:05:24 PM PST by PA Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59; TomHolly
TomHolly,Good question,Are you still here,'What would Clinton or Gore have done with Iraq? 9/11?"
43 posted on 01/20/2004 10:07:33 PM PST by fatima (Karen ,Ken 4 ID,Jim-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TomHolly; 4mycountry; netmilsmom; MeekOneGOP; ctlpdad; jriemer; Constitution Day; ...
Viking Kitty Ping!!

Can we make this our official pic? :)

44 posted on 01/20/2004 10:07:37 PM PST by TheBigB (I am Elmer J. Fudd, millionaire. I own a mansion and a yacht.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: fatima
Nope, this is my first zotting. Is it like deer hunting? I've never done that either LOL

Those kittens look dangerous.

45 posted on 01/20/2004 10:07:54 PM PST by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TomHolly
TomHolly,You asked who politey and you just told yourself you were a blankhead.
46 posted on 01/20/2004 10:10:05 PM PST by fatima (Karen ,Ken 4 ID,Jim-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
Yikes!!! You had to post that picture while I was typing my post! LOL
47 posted on 01/20/2004 10:10:10 PM PST by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TomHolly
"Maybe he's right. If the American people are not offended enough to throw him out of office, then apparently — in this country, anyway — the truth no longer matters." Where was this Reese prick (little nettle of only irritant value) when the sinkEmperor was lying to the people, lying under oath, and selling our nuclear technology to the Chicoms for campaign contributions, all allegations of which have been proven?
48 posted on 01/20/2004 10:10:41 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
Tuscaloosa Goldfinch,Female here,deer have more courage than TomHolly.
49 posted on 01/20/2004 10:13:17 PM PST by fatima (Karen ,Ken 4 ID,Jim-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
Who took the ketchup out of the fridge? I want another troll drumstick...Please..


50 posted on 01/20/2004 10:16:50 PM PST by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TomHolly

51 posted on 01/20/2004 10:17:20 PM PST by martin_fierro (Caught you looking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatima
Is TomHolly gone?

female here as well, hubby deer hunts. That's why I missed the SOTU address -- Al Sharpton was about to appear on O'Reilly, and he grates on hubby's nerves, so I changed over to a hunting show for dh. Lost track of the time. :-/ Hope I can see a replay somewhere.

52 posted on 01/20/2004 10:18:33 PM PST by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Oh, good. You don't use Del Monte, not Heinz. :-D
53 posted on 01/20/2004 10:21:12 PM PST by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
oooops -- make that -- You USE Del Monte, not Heinz. :-/
54 posted on 01/20/2004 10:22:11 PM PST by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
Is there a Zot Ketchup?
55 posted on 01/20/2004 10:23:12 PM PST by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Comment #56 Removed by Moderator

To: TomHolly
TomHolly,My granddaughter is in Iraq,4 ID-grow up.
57 posted on 01/20/2004 10:24:16 PM PST by fatima (Karen ,Ken 4 ID,Jim-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TomHolly; Admin Moderator
Here kitty, kitty, kitty!

.


58 posted on 01/20/2004 10:24:55 PM PST by sweetliberty (Even the smallest person can change the course of the future. - (LOTR))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sir_Ranulf
Huh?
59 posted on 01/20/2004 10:25:15 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: TomHolly
Tom, I can't rebut the points in the article because to a great extent I agree with Charlie Reese on this one. But I would offer another couple of alternatives as to why President Bush might not be ready to admit he was wrong. First off, there is still an outside chance that there might be some hidden weapons of mass destruction. I doubt they'll find anything to write home about but who knows? Also, it's not really fair to call the president a liar under these circumstances. He probably thought there were weapons of mass destruction and now he's still in denial. Not that I have much trust in any politicians but I do think it is probably more likely that the president acted on sloppy intelligence and bad advice rather than that he just intentionally lied to us all. If he was going to lie about it, he'd have had the spooks hide some WMD's so the G.I.'s would find them. If he was that dishonest he wouldn't just tell big lies and not cover himself with planted WMD's.
60 posted on 01/20/2004 10:25:19 PM PST by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson