Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retired judge chosen to preside over Scott Peterson murder trial
The San Francisco Chronicle ^ | Wednesday, January 21, 2004 | Kim Curtis

Posted on 01/22/2004 5:39:59 AM PST by runningbear

Retired judge chosen to preside over Scott Peterson murder trial

Retired judge chosen to preside over Scott Peterson murder trial

KIM CURTIS, Associated Press Writer Wednesday, January 21, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(01-21) 12:17 PST SAN FRANCISCO (AP) --

The judge presiding over Scott Peterson's murder trial will be Richard Arnason, a retired Contra Costa County judge chosen Wednesday by California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George.

Scott Peterson's murder trial is being moved to the San Francisco Bay area because of hostility toward Peterson in his dead wife's hometown.

Judge Al Girolami ruled earlier this month that the trial had to be moved out of Modesto to make sure Peterson got a fair trial in the slaying of his wife, Laci, and unborn son.

Four counties had offered to host the trial, and on Tuesday the judge picked San Mateo County, situated south of San Francisco and about 90 miles away from Modesto.

Girolami had said he wanted a county close enough to Modesto that witnesses could drive there.

"I'm satisfied we can get a fair and impartial jury in San Mateo," Girolami said, adding that he wants another judge appointed to handle the trial.

Arnason, 83, was appointed to the Contra Costa County Superior Court by Gov. Pat Brown in 1963.

No stranger to high profile court drama, Arnason presided over People v. Angela Davis in which the black militant was acquitted of murder and conspiracy in the 1970 Marin County courthouse escape attempt that resulted in the deaths of four people, including a judge.

Arnason also oversaw the trial of a California woman whose 13-year-old daughter weighed 680 pounds when she died of congestive heart failure in 1996.

The trial is scheduled to start Monday but will probably be postponed. A hearing is scheduled later this week to discuss a delay. Prosecutors asked for two weeks to move their operation from Stanislaus County to San Mateo County.

Peterson, 31, is charged with two counts of murder for allegedly killing his pregnant wife just before Christmas 2002 and dumping her body in the San Francisco Bay. In April, her remains and those of the fetus she was carrying washed ashore in the bay two miles from where her husband said he was fishing when she vanished. Peterson could get the death penalty.

Peterson's lawyers argued that he had been demonized in the Modesto area, citing vandalism of his house, crowds yelling "Murderer!" outside the jail and T-shirts sold with Peterson's likeness and the motto: "Modesto, a killer place to live." Blood drives have been held in honor of Laci Peterson and 3,000 people attended her internationally televised memorial service.

The trial will now be held in Redwood City, a .........

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contra Costa judge Arnason to hear trial of Scott Peterson


Judge Richard Arnason at the Martinez courthouse today. (Bob Pepping/Contra Costa Times)

Posted on Wed, Jan. 21, 2004

Contra Costa judge Arnason to hear trial of Scott

Peterson By Claire Booth

CONTRA COSTA TIMES

Contra Costa Superior Court Judge Richard Arnason, who juggles a calendar as busy as any in the Martinez courthouse, even though he has retired, will preside over the murder trial of Scott Peterson in San Mateo County, state officials announced today.

Arnason was assigned by Chief Justice Ronald George today to preside over the double murder trial. The case was moved to Redwood City because of extensive pretrial publicity in Stanislaus County.

Peterson, 31, is accused of murdering his eight-months pregnant wife, Laci Peterson of Modesto, and their unborn son in the early morning hours of Christmas Eve in 2002. Their bodies were found along the Richmond shoreline in April 2003.

In 41 years on the bench, Arnason has handled many complex cases, including that of Angela Davis. Davis was charged with murder, kidnapping and conspiracy in connection with a 1970 Marin County court shootout where four people, including a judge, were killed.

More recently, Arnason presided over the case of a former Stockton gang member who was sentenced to life in prison for murdering retired plastic surgeon Kim Fang during a home invasion robbery in Alamo in 2000.

Technically retired since 1995, Arnason, 82, still sits on the bench and gets paid on a per-day basis.

"There's Methuselah in the Bible, and there's Judge Arnason," state appellate justice and former county judge James Marchiano said in a 2001 interview.

Gov. Edmund G. "Pat" Brown appointed Arnason, an Antioch lawyer, to the bench in 1963. The judge has handled criminal law ever since, outlasting lawyers and judges that came before and after him.

"I had a long, lengthy career in the D.A.'s office that will have started and ended while Arnason's been on the bench," said former District Attorney Gary Yancey in 2001.

But it's not Arnason's longevity that is most admired.

"He exudes a sense of respect for other human beings, and he seems to know what it's like to be in someone else's shoes," said Public Defender David Coleman........

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson judge appointed

Peterson judge appointed

By Michelle Durand, Daily Journal Staff

When the Scott Peterson murder trial begins it will be a hodgepodge of resources, venues and participants from throughout the state — a crime in Stanislaus county, an arrest and defense attorney from Southern California and a trial in San Mateo County.

Now added to that list is retired Contra Costa County Judge Richard Earle Arnason, 82, who was tapped yesterday to preside over what stands to be the most publicized criminal trial since O.J. Simpson.

Arnason served for 31 years on the Contra Costa County Superior Court before his 1995 retirement. His record is filled with high-profile cases although Peterson’s will likely make Arnason a well-known name much as Judge Lance Ito did during the Simpson double murder trial.

Arnason was picked for the slot by state Chief Justice Ronald George a day after Stanislaus County Judge Al Girolami announced the case would move to San Mateo County. Girolami said he thought San Mateo County offered Peterson, a 31-year-old fertilizer salesman, the fairest shot at an objective jury. That jury will be charged with deciding whether Peterson is guilty of murdering his pregnant wife, Laci, 28, and the couple’s unborn son near Christmas Eve 2002. Peterson faces the death penalty if he is found guilty.

Girolami declined to hear the case himself because he did not want to travel and asked the Judicial Council of California to appoint a successor.

Arnason, who was appointed to the Contra Costa County Superior Court in 1963, is no stranger to death penalty cases. Arnason, who was not receiving media calls yesterday, is well-known as a criminal law expert, said Lynn Holton, council spokeswoman.

Arnason attended college at the University of North Dakota before moving onto law school at the University of California, Berkeley. He received his degree in 1945 and worked in private practice in the East Bay before joining the bench. In 1973, he was named Judge of the Year by the California Trial Lawyers Association.

Despite his retirement, he continues presiding over cases through the Assigned Judges Program at the standard rate of $529.32 daily. The program provides temporary judicial assignments to alleviate court congestion, fill vacancies or to handle change of venue requests. Arnason has participated since his retirement.

He heard the murder case of a Stockton gang member convicted of killing a plastic surgeon during a 2000 home invasion robbery. Soknoeun Nem was eligible for the death penalty in that case but instead Arnason imposed life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Arnason also presided over the 1972 murder/kidnapping trail of African-American activist Angela Davis. Davis was acquitted of murder and conspiracy in a 1970 shoot-out at the Marin County courthouse in which four people died.

In 1998, Arnason found El Cerrito resident Marlene Corrigan guilty of misdemeanor child abuse after her 13-year-old daughter died of congestive heart failure two years previous. The girl had weighed 680 pounds. Arnason sentenced Corrigan to probation and community service but dismissed felony child endangerment charges.

Also in 1998, Arnason halted death penalty proceedings against Jesse Martinez despite the man’s assertions that he wanted to go to death row. Arnason declared doubt about Martinez’s mental state although he said he has no illness. Martinez was convicted of murdering a 57-year-old convenience store clerk in September 1994.

Arnason was among the first judges to try a case under Proposition 21, the California law which allows minors to be charged as adults in certain crimes.

He has never tried any criminal cases in San Mateo County, said Chief Deputy ........

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FCSL forensics conference: The Pursuit of Truth

FCSL forensics conference: The Pursuit of Truth


Jagdeep S. Bhandari, professor of law at Florida Coastal School of Law, discusses the school’s upcoming conference, entitled Forensic Investigation: The Pursuit of Truth.

by Richard Prior
Staff Writer

The “big top of forensic investigation” will be in the shape of one large tent May 7 as Florida Coastal School of Law presents a conference featuring the nation’s top forensics experts.

The conference, which will be limited to 500 spectators, will be held at the Adam’s Mark Hotel. “We’re trying to give people exposure to the nation’s top forensic experts, the real CSI, the pursuit of truth,” said Eric Smith, associate dean for External Affairs and director of the Center for Strategic Governance and International Initiatives. “This is a world-class event.”

The line-up includes Sen. Arlen Specter, who concluded that a single bullet caused President John F. Kennedy’s neck wounds and all of the nonfatal wounds inflicted on Texas Gov. John Connally; and Dr. Cyril Wecht, Allegheny County (Pa.) coroner and founder of the Cyril Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law at Duquesne University School of Law.

Wecht has argued against the “tale of the magic bullet” since Specter proposed it in 1964 and it became part of the Warren Commission’s findings.

“My understanding is they’re good buddies,” said Smith. “They’ve made a lifetime arguing the theory.” Other speakers include:

• Dr. Henry C. Lee, a forensic scientist and criminalist, best known for his work in high-profile cases such as O.J. Simpson, Vince Foster and JonBenet Ramsey.

• Dr. Michael Baden, co-director of the New York State Police Medicolegal Investigation Unit. His cases include the examination of the remains of Czar Nicholas and his family, the death of John Belushi and the disappearance and death of Laci Peterson.

• Barry Scheck, professor of law and director of clinical education at New York’s Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. The co-founder of the Innocence Project has represented clients such as O.J. Simpson and au pair Louise Woodward.

• Ann Wolbert Burgess, RN, professor at William F. Connell School of Nursing at Boston College and a renowned researcher, author, educator and advanced practice psychiatric nurse.

The law school also expects to have lawyer and author Scott Turow attend the conference, perhaps making a public speech before the event gets under way. “This law school and the Cyril Wecht Institute are bringing the people who are behind the scenes in one respect and yet very much in the forefront of the cases that are out there now,” said Smith.

The public’s knowledge of forensic science has been boosted by the popularity of two CSI shows on CBS, which has been responsible for making it “the No. 1 network,” said Jarrod Turner, FCSL’s director of Institutional Support and one of the conference’s organizers.

“One cannot overstate the value of forensic science in our search for truth in criminal, civil and family medicolegal investigations and court proceedings,” said Wecht. “This conference is designed to explore and inform professionals and academics, from a variety of disciplines and fields, of the value and scope of forensic science as a powerful investigative tool.” The idea for the conference, “the guy that’s riding the point on this,” Smith said, Is Professor Jagdeep Bhandari, who worked on the project with the school’s new owners, Sterling Partners.

“It is he who brought the idea to the table,” said Smith. “Without him, this dog doesn’t hunt.” Bhandari has taught economics, done international transaction and immigration work, and has worked at the World Bank. He has also worked with several of those who will be at the conference, including Lee, Wecht and Scheck.

“It was a matter of making a lot of phone calls,” said Bhandari. “Henry Lee consults to 12 governments. You can’t talk to him on the telephone. Or Barry Scheck, unless they know who you are.

“I had to use up all the capital I had to say, ‘Come to Florida, and we’ll show you a good time.’” The conference has been approved for continuing legal, medical and nursing education.

“It’s good for professionals and for interested lay people as well,” said Smith. “We’re hoping that, not just national and international people, but local people will attend.”

Smith expects the rush will be on soon for tickets to the conference, which will “comfortably accommodate” an audience of about 500 at the Adam’s Mark. Those who are interested in attending may register online at www.fcsl.edu/forensics or by phoning (888) 24........

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jury selection a tedious process

Jury selection a tedious process

By Dana Yates, Daily Journal Staff

In the coming weeks, hundreds of potential jurors in San Mateo County will receive court summons attached to a pleasant letter highlighting the positive side of the responsibility.

“It’s a really nice letter that tells them that they can bring laptops, where to find parking, how to get a parking permit and how to check the Web site,” said San Mateo County Presiding Judge Mark Forcum.

Despite the cheery tone, the process of picking a jury for the Scott Peterson trial will be long and painful for all involved.

Peterson, a Modesto fertilizer salesman, is charged with the murder of his wife Laci Peterson and their unborn child. If convicted, Peterson could face the death penalty or life in prison.

“The jury selection will be tremendously important for both the defense and prosecution. In this particular case, it won’t go as routine. Given the length of the trial they will go through an extensive procedure,” said Jim Hartnett, an attorney with Hartnett, Smith & Associates and a Redwood City Councilmember.

For potential jurors, it’s going to be long and tedious. For attorneys, it’s going to be crucial and possibly very expensive.

Those who receive a summons will be pooled together in the courthouse and given a questionnaire to determine if a lengthy trial would create a hardship for them. Those who can afford to devote months to the trial are randomly divided into “panels” of approximately 60, said Forcum.

Each panel is sent to a courtroom where attorneys question them in person. People may be questioned individually, as a group or with a lengthy questionnaire. The judge determines the process and scope of questioning. Retired Judge Richard Arnason, 82, was chosen yesterday to oversee the Peterson case. The trial is expected to last five months.

Questions could range from religion to family history. Each side has 20 opportunities to eliminate jurors in what’s called a peremptory challenge. Jurors can be eliminated for any reason except on the basis of race, said Jeff Boyarski, a San Mateo County defense attorney.

In most high-profile cases, attorneys often hire consultants to analyze the jury pool and recommend selections. Consultant groups, like the Oakland-based National Jury Project, provide services ranging from demographic studies to mock trials.

“They do a lot of studies on cases and what their outcomes have been. They help with preparing questionnaires, change of venues — if you want to go full board, they can get sample jurors before they are tried,” said Boyarski.

Depending on the type of money Peterson can afford to drop on this trial, consultants can create trial scenarios by picking different types of focus groups to act as juries before the real trial ever starts. The focus groups allow the defense to figure out how different types of jurors would respond.

Sequestering the jury might prove to more difficult than choosing one.........

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We have a judge!

Article Last Updated: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 - 1:59:49 PM PST

We have a judge!

By Jason Dearen - STAFF WRITER

REDWOOD CITY - Retired Contra Costa County Superior Court Judge Richard Arnason, a jurist with long experience in trying complex murder cases, was named today to preside over the Laci Peterson murder trial.

California Supreme Court Justice Ronald George made the announcement just one day after the trial was moved to the County by Stanislaus County Judge Al Girolami to San Mateo County.

Laci Peterson was reported missing on Christmas Eve 2002. Her body and the body of her unborn child washed ashore in Richmond four months later. Her husband, Scott Peterson, 31, is the alleged killer, and faces two counts of murder and the death penalty.

Arnason is a well-known criminal law expert who has extensive experience with death penalty cases. He sat on the Contra Costa County Superior Court bench for 31 years before his retirement in 1995.


Members of the media tour the courtroom in Redwood City Tuesday, where the murder case against Scott Peterson is to be tried. Judge Al Girolami ruled Tuesday that the case will be moved to San Mateo County after rejecting a prosecution request to keep the case in Modesto. Peterson, 31, is charged with two counts of murder for allegedly killing his pregnant wife just before Christmas 2002 and dumping her body in San Francisco Bay. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

The judge is a member of the Chief Justice's Assigned Judges Program, which assigns judges to preside criminal trials. He has done so primarily in Contra Costa County. Arnason was one of the first judges to try a case under Proposition 21, the law that allows prosecutors to file felony charges for some offenses against juveniles 14 years or older without a judge's approval.

He also presided over the murder-kidnapping trial in the case of Angela Davis, a UCLA professor and radical activist who supported the Black Panthers and others during the 1960s and 1970s. She was acquitted and continued her academic and writing career. Judge Mark Forcum, the presiding judge in San Mateo County, said he will provide Arnason all of the support he needs during what is expected to be a lengthy and contentious trial. Admitted to the California Bar in 1945, Arnason attended Boalt Hall School of Law at UC Berkeley.

Arnason's appointment was the latest event in a fast-moving drama that began Tuesday when the hyper-publicized trial was sent here from Stanislaus County.

With its high profile and masses of media from around the world, the trial may easily become the biggest criminal event in County history, while bringing millions of visitor dollars to hotels and retail outlets.

Stanislaus County Superior Court Judge Al Girolami moved the trial after finding that Peterson, 31, could not receive a fair trial in Modesto because of extensive media coverage. An hour after Girolami sent the trial to the County, television camera crews and newspaper reporters began arriving in droves.

"I'm satisfied we can get a fair and impartial jury in San Mateo," Girolami said from a Modesto courtroom Tuesday. .........

Peterson attorney cites burden borne by defendant's parents

Peterson attorney cites burden borne by defendant's parents

By Harriet Ryan

Court TV

Wednesday, January 21, 2004 Posted: 4:12 PM EST (2112 GMT)


Peterson, left, and attorney Mark Geragos.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Court TV) -- Scott Peterson's lawyer said Tuesday the double-murder suspect's parents have spent a million dollars on his defense.

Attorney Mark Geragos made the disclosure while asking Superior Court Judge Al Girolami to move the trial to southern California, closer to the Petersons' San Diego home, as well as Geragos' office in Los Angeles.

He said Jackie and Lee Peterson's funding "has saved the taxpayer's a seven-figure sum, at least" and asked the judge to consider which venue was more convenient and cheaper for them.

He noted that his client has the right to ask the taxpayer's to foot some of the bill if he can no longer afford private representation, but has so far not exercised that right.

Under California law, if a capital defendant becomes indigent before the conclusion of his or her trial, a judge can order the local government to pay the private attorney's costs, albeit at a reduced rate.

Prosecutor Dave Harris objected to the mention of the Petersons' finances, saying the defense team starts talking about public money whenever "the court doesn't give them their way."

In the end, Girolami said Southern California was too far from Modesto .........

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 461-475 next last
To: runningbear
Thanks for the ping, as always, looks like there will be a lot going on from here on in, til the trial starts.
61 posted on 01/23/2004 12:37:48 AM PST by blondee123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Diver Dave
lol...
62 posted on 01/23/2004 2:43:05 AM PST by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: All
Continuing the thread for today, and ???

Prosecutors remove judge in Laci Peterson murder case

Posted on Fri, Jan. 23, 2004

Prosecutors remove judge in Laci Peterson murder case

Associated Press

MODESTO, Calif. - The Scott Peterson double-murder case returns to court Friday for procedural motions the day after prosecutors exercised their ability to remove a new judge from the upcoming trial on grounds he would be biased against them.

Prosecutors on Thursday challenged the assignment of Judge Richard Arnason, an 82-year-old retired judge with a reputation for a fatherly demeanor, in a maneuver that automatically guarantees his removal. It also guaranteed a delay in the start of the trial against Peterson, whom prosecutors allege killed his wife and unborn son.

Deputy District Attorney Rick Distaso filed the challenge in Stanislaus County Superior Court after Arnason was appointed Wednesday to oversee the high-profile trial when it is moved to San Mateo County.

In a 56-word declaration, Distaso said Arnason "is prejudiced against the interest of the party, so that I believe I cannot have a fair and impartial hearing."

Prosecutors refused to elaborate on their reason for removing the judge, said a receptionist in the Stanislaus County District Attorney's office. Peterson's defense lawyer did not return calls seeking comment.

The peremptory challenge did not require that prosecutors show cause. Each side in the case gets one challenge.

The tactical move will postpone the case that was scheduled to start Monday because it will take a few days to find a new judge, said Lynn Holton, spokeswoman for the state's court administration.

State Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George said it would take until next week to find another judge qualified to handle the case, Holton said.

A hearing is scheduled Friday in Modesto to discuss the transfer to a courthouse in Redwood City and future court dates.

Arnason was selected Wednesday by George, in part because of his experience handling major trials. Court officials opted for a retired judge to hear the six-month case to avoid slowing down other trials.

Peterson, 31, faces the death penalty if convicted of two counts of murder for allegedly killing his pregnant wife, Laci, just before Christmas 2002 and dumping her body in San Francisco Bay. In April, her remains and those of the fetus washed ashore two miles from where her husband said he was fishing on Christmas Eve when she vanished.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Court hearing in Laci Peterson killing

Court hearing in Laci Peterson killing

Modesto, California-AP -- There's another court hearing today for Scott Peterson, the California man charged in the death of his wife, Laci, and their unborn son.

Today's hearing to discuss a required change of venue and future court dates comes a day after prosecutors exercised their ability to remove a new judge from the upcoming trial.

Each side in the case gets one such challenge and isn't required to explain.

A new judge will be appointed by California's chief justice. That's expected to.......

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson case to get a new judge</>

Peterson case to get a new judge

Thursday, January 22, 2004 Posted: 5:12 PM EST (2212 GMT)

(CNN) -- The murder trial of Scott Peterson will be delayed and get still another new judge after the district attorney in the case Thursday challenged the state chief justice's appointment of Judge Richard Arnason, announced only the day before.

"Under California law, each side is permitted one peremptory challenge, which effectively removes that judge from the case," said Lynn Holton, a spokeswoman for the California Judicial Council.

In a brief filed in Stanislaus County Superior Court, Modesto District Attorney James Brazelton said Arnason "is prejudiced against the interest of the party so that I believe that I cannot have a fair and impartial hearing" before him.

Peterson is charged with murdering his wife, Laci, and their unborn son in December 2002. Laci Peterson was last seen on Christmas Eve 2002, and the bodies washed up separately on the shore of San Francisco Bay in April 2003.

Peterson told police that he was fishing in the bay on the day his wife disappeared and had launched his boat from the Berkeley Marina. The bodies washed ashore just miles from the marina.

Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty.

Chief Justice Ronald George assigned Arnason to hear the case when Stanislaus County Superior Court Judge Al Girolami stepped down after deciding to move the trial 90 miles away from Modesto to San Mateo County. (Full story)

Holton said George gave a great deal of consideration to the selection of Arnason and would give the same amount of consideration to his replacement.

"Therefore, he will not be making his selection until next week, but he is already starting to consider other .......

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prosecutors Remove Peterson Judge

Prosecutors Remove Peterson Judge

Thursday, January 22, 2004

MODESTO, Calif. — Prosecutors in the murder case against Scott Peterson (search) exercised their ability Thursday to remove the judge appointed to preside at the trial, contending he is biased against them.

Under California law, the prosecution and the defense each have one opportunity to remove a judge without having to give a reason. A new judge will be appointed by California's chief justice.

Peterson, 31, is accused of murdering his pregnant wife, Laci, just before Christmas 2002 and dumping her body in San Francisco Bay. Her remains and those of the fetus she was carrying later washed ashore.

Prosecutors acted a day after retired Judge Richard Arnason (search), 82, was named to oversee the Peterson case when it is moved from central California to the San Francisco Bay area.

The case is being moved after a Modesto judge ruled Peterson could not easily get a fair trial in his dead wife's hometown.

Deputy District Attorney Rick Distaso (search) said Arnason "is prejudiced against the interest of the party, so that I believe I cannot have a fair and impartial hearing."

Prosecutors refused to elaborate on their reason for removing the judge, said a receptionist in the Stanislaus County District Attorney's office. Peterson's defense lawyer did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

The tactical move will postpone the case that was scheduled to start Monday, said Lynn Holton, spokeswoman for the state's court administration.

Holton said it will take State Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George (search) until next week to find another judge for the case.

A hearing is scheduled Friday in Modesto to discuss the transfer to a courthouse in Redwood City and future court dates. .....

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Double-edged sword raised in trial move

Posted on Fri, Jan. 23, 2004

Double-edged sword raised in trial move

By L.A. Chung

Mercury News Staff Columnist

If she could say it all over again, Anne LeClair would say it differently.

After a Modesto judge announced that the murder trial of Scott Peterson would be moved to Redwood City, the president of the San Mateo County Convention & Visitors Bureau said she and her staff were ``ecstatic.'' They were ``screaming with great excitement,'' she said, as quoted from here to London. Now she's chagrined at how that looks in print.

``My heart sank,'' LeClair said. And eyebrows rose. From here to London.

Is a double-murder trial coming to your community akin to landing a doctors' convention? Is it like getting an arena football team?

``This is hysterical to me,'' Bill Fallon, a legal commentator on MSNBC's ``The Abrams Report,'' said Tuesday, when LeClair appeared as a guest to address the impact of the change in venue. ``I mean, it's almost offensive.''

My eyebrows rose too. So I called.

LeClair has spent nights thinking about how she and the bureau ended up looking like mercenaries and ambulance chasers (her words).

``We feel terrible about it,'' LeClair said. ``We feel terrible about the circumstances of this trial. We did not mean any disrespect to Laci Peterson at all.''

Didn't lobby

But groups like hers assist whether people come for weddings, or God forbid, a murder case like that of Laci Peterson. LeClair has written a letter to the editor to various newspapers, trying to set the record straight: That the bureau did not lobby for the trial, did not try to sell the county or compete with other counties under consideration.

Some know that big trials are a double-edged sword -- that the attention has both opportunities and pitfalls.

``Welcome to the high-profile trial club,'' e-mailed a counterpart, Jim Ricketts at the Virginia Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau, the community where the sniper trial of John Muhammad ended barely two months ago. He offered contacts on logistics if LeClair needed them.

LeClair got involved by writing to Judge Al Girolami of the Stanislaus County Superior Court, saying she understood that San Mateo County was one of several under consideration for the change of venue.

If the trial ended up in San Mateo County, she said, here was a contact to assist news organizations with audio-visual, permit requirements, lodging and the like. That turned into ........

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unborn victims bill gains House panel's approval

Unborn victims bill gains House panel's approval

Jan 22, 2004
By Staff

WASHINGTON (BP)--A House of Representatives committee has pushed forward legislation that would recognize an unborn child as a crime victim when injured or slain during the commission of a crime against his mother.

The House Judiciary Committee voted 20-13 for the Unborn Victims of Violence Act in action Jan. 21. The vote was along party lines, with Republicans in the majority.

Passage on the House floor is expected. The House approved the measure in both 1999 and 2001, but the Senate has never acted on it. President Bush has indicated he will sign the bill if it arrives on his desk.

Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., said the bill "promotes a compassionate and just society by punishing those criminals that target pregnant women and harm unborn children through violence."

Abortion-rights advocates oppose the measure, even though it exempts the performance of an abortion. NARAL Pro-choice America, a leading abortion-rights organization, has described the bill as a "sneak attack on a woman's right to choose."

However, Doug Johnson, the National Right to Life Committee's legislative director, said, "When a criminal attacks a woman and kills her unborn child, he has claimed two victims, and this bill would recognize that for federal crimes.

"The bill explicitly exempts abortion -- yet, pro-abortion advocacy groups have so far obstructed the bill in the Senate," Johnson said.

The House bill is H.R. 1997 and is sponsored by Rep. Melissa Hart, R-Pa. The Senate version is S. 1019, with Sen. Mike DeWine, R-Ohio, its chief sponsor.

In the House, the bill is titled Laci and Conner's........

63 posted on 01/23/2004 5:25:50 AM PST by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
"Just my opinion: You BET she sold it! And I think her story stinks anyway!"

It does seem far fetched to me. I wonder whatever happened to Dirty, Skeeter & attorney Frank Muna? That story, at least, seemed a bit more plausible.
64 posted on 01/23/2004 5:31:12 AM PST by drjulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
Enquiring minds want to know...

Considering Penny's monologue about grandma and the name Scott: Did she ever name a child of hers Scott? Or did she diss grandma?
65 posted on 01/23/2004 6:15:54 AM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
Slim,

I missed this yesterday... sorry!
I am picture-impaired at the moment, I'm afraid.

CD

66 posted on 01/23/2004 7:07:59 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
All is forgiven...you were doing good works.
67 posted on 01/23/2004 7:09:47 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Come see the violence inherent in the system!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim; hellinahandcart; dighton
Hey, I forgot to mention that I met hellinahandcart for the first time.
If we had had dighton in attendance, we'd almost have a quorum of the Nasty Little Clique™!

Gotta go now, others are waiting for this computer.

CD

68 posted on 01/23/2004 7:20:05 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: All; runningbear; Jackie-O; maggiefluffs; oceanperch; joyce11111; Devil_Anse; RGSpincich; ...
POSSIBLE REASONS FOR JUDGE ARNASON'S REMOVAL
(This below may be the reason, but I would like to know if Prosecutor Distaso or any of the other Prosecutor's in the Peterson case and Judge Arnason ever faced each other on a different case and what the outcome was.)

SNIPPET:
Although prosecutors weren't required to say specifically why they didn't want Arnason, legal experts said Thursday that the judge's handling of the Angela Davis murder and conspiracy trial three decades ago -- in which he released the black militant on bail and granted her co-counsel status -- may have been a factor in removing him from the Peterson case.

Arnason has also come under fire from prosecutors in a handful of cases when he declined to count prior convictions under the state's "three strikes" law. The law requires a prison term of 25 years to life for felons convicted of a third felony after two serious or violent felony convictions.

In 1996, Contra Costa prosecutors criticized Arnason for disregarding a 23-year-old Pittsburg man's two burglary convictions when sentencing him to 16 years in prison for snatching a high school teacher's purse.

"Obviously, (Stanislaus County prosecutors) have looked at his prior cases and prior writings. The prosecution is making the choice that they'd rather take the chance with someone else than him," said Erwin Chemerinsky, a law professor at the University of Southern California.

"I'm sure that the D.A. sees that as being a soft-on-crime judge, and they want a judge who they feel will uphold the law rather than change the law, " said Ernie Spokes, a former Stanislaus County prosecutor who is now a defense attorney.
San Francisco Chronicle

69 posted on 01/23/2004 7:59:08 AM PST by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Let's see ... my guess is that he was removed because of his liberal leanings. After all, he went to law school at Berkeley.


EXCERPT

...Prosecutors plan to ask during a hearing today for a two-week delay to move their operation, Distaso said in court this week.

Several legal observers doubted that prosecutors decided to block Arnason to buy time.

“I don’t think they would have done it to try to get a delay,” veteran Modesto defense attorney Robert Wildman said. “In a matter of hours they could have had another judge assigned.”

Girolami could opt to remain with the case, legal observers said. Earlier this month, Girolami agreed to a defense request to move the case, ruling that massive publicity endangered Peterson’s ability to get a fair trial in his wife’s hometown.

Arnason has demonstrated compassion on the bench and some could view that as liberalism, Hammer said, pointing to press reports that Arnason delayed proceedings after a capital murder defendant was not allowed to shave in jail before coming to court.

Arnason reportedly took off his judge’s robe, walked to a convenience store, bought a razor and shaving cream, and let the defendant shave in his private bathroom.

In 1996, he presided over the trial of a mother who was convicted of child abuse because her 680-pound daughter died of congestive heart failure at age 13. Arnason sentenced the mother to three years’ probation and 240 hours of community service.

In 1994, in a case in which a man stole $80 worth of batteries, Arnason refused to impose a life sentence, even though California’s “three strikes, you’re out” law, adopted earlier that year, allowed the stiff sentence. The judge said he had the discretion to reduce a felony conviction to a misdemeanor.

Accurso, who said he has known Arnason for 20 to 25 years, described him as a “straight arrow.”

“He doesn’t favor anybody,” Accurso said. “As judges you sometimes have to make rulings that go against your grain, but that’s what the rules are and that’s his reputation.”

Analysts said it was speculation to try to determine prosecutors’ motives for disqualifying the judge, but said prosecutors are to have asked their counterparts in Contra Costa County how they had fared in front of Arnason.

“It seems both sides did their homework,” Hammer said. “And the prosecution found something they didn’t like.”

http://www.mercedsun-star.com/news/newsview.asp?c=91975
70 posted on 01/23/2004 8:18:23 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: joyce11111
I didn't like Arnason either Joyce. He is a soft on crime judge (a REAL Liberal) and he would likely be talked into bail for Snott. I'm EXTREMELY relieved that he's off this case. As to Girolami, Geragos LOST a lot more motions than he won with Girolami. In fact, Geragos attempted to have Girolami removed but Girolami refused.
71 posted on 01/23/2004 11:35:01 AM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
Jeez, I've been watching Court TV on this case and Geragos is arguing that the Prosecution was too late to file their papers on the removal of Judge Arnason. He even is arguing that Girolami can no longer rule on any of the issues.!! According to Beth Karas, it may be the Judges Council that decides on a new Judge OR Arnason HIMSELF???? God this is getting complicated. Geragos is going to be a pain the arse all the way through this trial. He's always arguing that the sitting Judge CAN'T do this or that. I thought Distaso had a good answer. He stated that he completely DISAGREED with Geragos' argument because "were not arguing Statutes here but Constitutionality"!! That made sense to me but then Beth Karas comes out with "Arnason himself may have to hear the argument to remove himself"?? Help!! Dev - any information?????
72 posted on 01/23/2004 11:57:33 AM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
Too late? In one day?
73 posted on 01/23/2004 11:58:14 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Yeah I know?? I didn't really get the goings on. First they had a representative from the Judicial Council saying that Judge George was selecting a "new Judge" and then Beth Karas reports that the challenge may be heard by Arnason himself? I think the Prosecutors are right on this. As Distaso pointed out, he had no other time to file the challenge.
74 posted on 01/23/2004 12:03:43 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
MSNBC: trial delayed.

Hearing date: 2/2

Geragos said that they didn't file in a "timely" manner......should have filed on the day he was assigned.
75 posted on 01/23/2004 12:10:08 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I listened to as much of Geragos's argument as I could stomach and then I muted it. Then when Distaso spoke I listened. After my last post to you I could hear them talking about this again on Court TV and Beth Karas is NOW saying that the Prosecution will very likely get a new Judge or Girolami may opt to stay with the case. I'm praying that Girolami stays with it. He knows this case the best and I think he's a good Judge. He's very sharp, he's unflappable, he doesn't play any of the Defense games and he's just an all around good Judge. What do you think?
76 posted on 01/23/2004 12:43:04 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Diver Dave
DD - your post #49 - GREAT scenario!! Your just too kind to the Snott however, LOL!! Maybe your wife could suggest a couple more ideas to go along with yours. Perhaps there should be a rest stop at a spot overlooking the Bay!! You know, just stop and look out over the Bay and think about how cold, dirty, and dark it is at the bottom of that Bay. (I'd like to attach a few "seement" weights to Snotty and drop him in alive. (He pronounces cement - seement).
77 posted on 01/23/2004 1:13:32 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
OKAY, Where is EVERYBODY??? I'm snowed in and have time to post today and everybody decides to take a hike!! Sheesh.
78 posted on 01/23/2004 3:13:07 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Thanks for the article! I'm starting to be glad Judge Arnason is out of the picture.
79 posted on 01/23/2004 3:50:14 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
That does it! Add grandma to the witness list!!
80 posted on 01/23/2004 3:51:44 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 461-475 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson