Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Call this one the Super Bowl of sleaze(Even liberal TV critics disgusted)
MSNBC ^ | 2/2/04 | Tom Shales

Posted on 02/02/2004 11:50:45 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last
To: Protagoras
Apparently they did stipulate what couldn't happen and MTV did it anyway. Here's the comish's statement:
"We were extremely disappointed by the MTV-produced halftime show. It was totally inconsistent with assurances our office was given about the content of the show.

"The show was offensive, inappropriate and embarrassing to us and our fans. We will change our policy, our people and our processes for managing the halftime entertainment in the future in order to deal far more effectively with the quality of this aspect of the Super Bowl."

81 posted on 02/02/2004 12:48:54 PM PST by discostu (are you in the pocket of the moment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: tongue-tied
The "cure" was to make two slits, one on either side right at the base to relieve the blood pressure. Then stitches.

Why do they need to do all that, when they could just show the patient a pic of Hillary. Should cause instant deflation.

82 posted on 02/02/2004 12:49:38 PM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: commish
If I remember correctly that disclosure also mentioned the possibility of 'rectal leaking'.

Too Funny.
83 posted on 02/02/2004 12:49:52 PM PST by Leavemealone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Some of my friend's kids were at my house watching the Super Bowl and they were just as shocked as the adults were. The half time show was the worst one I've ever seen.
84 posted on 02/02/2004 12:49:56 PM PST by NRA2BFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts; wtc911
hehehehe....both of you cracked me up here.
85 posted on 02/02/2004 12:52:32 PM PST by tongue-tied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: sr4402; SerpentDove

So many channels, so little watch.

I watch almost no TV not because I don't like to, but because I don't like the crap. I can remember 10 years ago, watching Saturday Morning cartoons with my daugher (when they still had them), and seeing commercials for not-ready-for-Family-Hour prime time shows.

I grew up in the 60s and 70s, and loved TV back then. Now I occsionally channel surf at my friends houses to appreciate the money I'm saving by not having cable.


86 posted on 02/02/2004 12:53:57 PM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
A flatulent horse has been done before on Seinfeld's "The Rye" episode, but with comparable nuance and taste

Yes, the infamous "beefareeno" episode. Loved that one.. Hilarious!

I don't know who's running these ad agencies, but they need to clean house. Most of their ideas are either tired, boring, or flat out distasteful. In my opinion they couldn't sell a glass of ice water to a man dying of thirst. I make it a point *not* to buy some of their products that they're hawking if the commercial turns me off.

Calling Darrin Stevens!!!!!

87 posted on 02/02/2004 12:55:21 PM PST by LisaMalia (Buckeye Fan since birth!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: discostu
I read their statement. It was deflection.

They didn't watch ANY of the rehersals? I don't believe that. The "teat" stunt was only one aspect of the abasing conduct. One imbecile was fondling his privates incessantly.

If they had fraud perpetrated upon them they should sue. Anything else is just scape goating IMO.

88 posted on 02/02/2004 12:55:37 PM PST by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
There was also an excess of commercials for drugs designed to help men suffering from erectile dysfunction.

Yes.

Between Viagra, Levitra and now Cialis it would appear there is some "stiff competition."

Personally I like the generic name for Cialis - Tadalafil. "Ta-Da"

89 posted on 02/02/2004 12:56:27 PM PST by N. Theknow (Be a glowworm, a glowworm's never glum, cuz how can you be grumpy when the sun shines out your bum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
Sorry CBS, we have over 200 other channels to try, I guess we might look at you again in another year if you televise the superbowl again.

By subscribing to cable ot satellite, you keep Viacom in business. You are paying them to show this stuff. Cancel your cable/satellite and insist that Viacom channels be made optional. It won't take long.

Doesn't Michael Jackson own big shares of Viacom? (I vaguely recall that he did at one time.)

90 posted on 02/02/2004 12:58:26 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
did the obvious and went to the MTV.com site and the 'you tell us' link to complain. upon pressing the 'submit' button, I got the following error: "Sorry, you are not eligible for this sweepstakes."

guess they got buried already.

91 posted on 02/02/2004 12:58:56 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
If the "boob incident" had not happened, the news would have been taken up with indignation about the leather-fetish, jockstrap costumes, the appalling musical lyrics and lewd dancing such as one could generally see only in some sleazy nudie or homo bar - or on MTV (practically the same difference).

The "boob incident" was designed to detract attention from these other outrages, which have now been mainstreamed as they pale in comparison, sort of.

Ah, for the good old days of people ragging on Dan Quayle because he criticized "Murphy Brown". How far we have come!

92 posted on 02/02/2004 12:59:07 PM PST by Gritty ("Leftists only favor liberty when it is destructive of the society they live in-Dr John Ray)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burn24
Do we really want a nation full of hypersexed 65 year old men?

That's kind of a loaded question to ask a 47 year old single woman....:)

Seriously though, these commercials are crossing the line. If there is, in fact, a line that even exsists anymore. I think all "lines" have been erased little by little over the years. We're living in an "anything goes" society, and I'm sick of it.

93 posted on 02/02/2004 1:00:19 PM PST by LisaMalia (Buckeye Fan since birth!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
I never laughed so hard in my life.

My favorite part of that commercial was when they got to mentioning the side effects. (paraphrasing) "Delayed lower back pain"! LOL! I'm not a man, but I would imagine that if one were to take full advantage of an erection lasting many hours, a delayed lower back pain would indeed result!

94 posted on 02/02/2004 1:01:50 PM PST by Snowy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Thank you. I knew NFL had nothing to do with this.
95 posted on 02/02/2004 1:04:46 PM PST by humboldtconservative (deport ALL illegals......immediately......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: LisaMalia
I don't know who's running these ad agencies, but they need to clean house. Most of their ideas are either tired, boring, or flat out distasteful. In my opinion they couldn't sell a glass of ice water to a man dying of thirst. I make it a point *not* to buy some of their products that they're hawking if the commercial turns me off.

I'm with you. As much as I love 'em, I won't touch another Carl's Jr. burger until Hugh Hefner is off their ads. I made a point of it not to go to Midas for a needed muffler repair after that nauseating bit where a septugenarian woman stripped her blouse off. I don't have to swear off Clairol Herbal Essence shampoo because I am not a woman, but if I was, I would.

Have you seen the new Extra! Sugar Free gum commercial with that stick of gum shouting with a Scottish accent? What kind of drugs was the author of that spot on?

96 posted on 02/02/2004 1:05:05 PM PST by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Super Bowl XXXVIII D.
97 posted on 02/02/2004 1:07:01 PM PST by Charles Henrickson (Paul Taglineabue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humboldtconservative
Sorry sir, you are no real football fan.

Go ahead and test me -- I'll match my knowlege of the game of football up against anyone on this board, including you.

How can you even say that? You show your ignorance right here. So, I guess the 1985 Bears should have never won, right?

The 1985 Bears were a solid team in all areas of the game, and a thoroughly dominant team in several key areas. They had the sixth-ranked offense in the NFL that year (#1 rushing), and the top-ranked defense as well (despite playing the entire season without former Pro Bowl safety Todd Bell, who sat out the season in a contract dispute and whose absence wasn't even noticed). They sent nine players to the Pro Bowl, and their front seven may have been the best unit ever to play the game (they could end up with as many as five Hall of Famers among them).

Their well-balanced offense (both QB Jim McMahon and RB Walter Payton were Pro Bowlers) and dominant defense were complemented by solid special teams play, too -- kicker Keven Butler was one of the most underrated players at his position throughout his career, since he put up solid numbers despite kicking half the time in one of the worst places in the NFL for kickers.

A team that goes through three rounds of the NFL playoffs and gives up a total of 10 points to opposing teams (all of them in their 46-10 victory over New England in the Super Bowl) will never have to justify its place in NFL history.

The last 5 or 6 years have been the most competitive football that we have ever seen. But, you must be one of those who wants the same three teams win every year.

That may be true, but it has nothing to do with what I said about the quality of play in the NFL. The last 5 or 6 years have also seen a number of "incomplete" championship-caliber teams (which is why I said that neither team in yesterday's game would have made the playoffs in pre-cap days), as well as a disturbing number of teams whose performance in the Super Bowl accurately reflected the harsh truth that they had no business playing in the Super Bowl in the first place (the Giants in 2001 and the Falcons in 1999, in particular).

98 posted on 02/02/2004 1:09:26 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow
Personally I like the generic name for Cialis - Tadalafil. "Ta-Da"

If you taped the game, check out the Cialis ad voiceover. In that part of the commercial in which they do the disclaimer about side effects (dry mouth, diarrhea, etc.), the announcer says something about "although four-hour erections are rare, if one occurs, contact your doctor."

I gotta wonder if that was written that way to highlight the effectiveness rather than issue a warning.

99 posted on 02/02/2004 1:09:49 PM PST by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Hey; I thought the horse fart ad and the bear ad were great.
100 posted on 02/02/2004 1:18:14 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson