Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secretary Rumsfeld Stakeout after House Armed Services Committee Testimony
United States Department of Defense ^ | Wednesday, February 4, 2004 | Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld

Posted on 02/04/2004 7:32:27 PM PST by Calpernia

Chairman Hunter: We had a good double session with the Secretary. The Senate borrowed our quarters today, and Senator Warner ran a full hearing with the Secretary and General Pace. We had similarly a good hearing. We unveiled the, and answered many questions about the defense budget. We think it is a good balance between the exigencies of the operations in Afghanistan and Iraq and of course the long-term requirements of U.S. military. The Secretary did double duty today good double-header, and we would be happy to take a couple of questions

Q: Mr. Secretary I wanted to ask you about Pakistan and nuclear capabilities. The founder of Pakistan Nuclear program has admitted that he sold nuclear technology. Why would he do this? And could he do this without the knowledge of the government and the Army.

Rumsfeld: There are any number of public reports on that subject. They are of, first of all, no one I know has ground truth on precisely what happened over what period of time. I know that our intelligence community has a good deal of good information on this subject, which I’m not at liberty to discuss. My impression is that the government of Pakistan has approached this serious problem in a very responsible and orderly way. And I impressed with the way President Musharef has address it thus far.

Q: Are you very concerned about this?

Rumsfeld: Any one, any citizen has to be concerned when one reads about the existence of a what appears to be a private network that has proliferated nuclear technology to a variety of companies – allegedly.

Q: Mr. Secretary a year ago the (inaudible) in the war in Iraq, in the region. If you new then what you know now repeating what Mr. Kay said about the absence of weapons of mass destruction do you think the American would have gone ahead in March?

Rumsfeld: First of all, I think it is important not to misrepresent what Dr. Kay has said. Dr. Kay has said a great many things. He has not filed an official written report it has been a oral report. He had indicated that he feels they are about 85 percent complete. General Dayton has the responsibility for running Iraq survey group. And Dr. Duelfer is going to be taking his place, though I have not met him yet. He, as well as Dr Kay both have excellent reputations and certainly General Dayton is doing a very good job. There is work yet to be done. So I think that a question that’s premised upon that assumption nothing has been found, which is not true, (inaudible) but nothing will be found would be a mistake. The answer to your question is yes there is no doubt in my mind the President made the right decision. Congress made the right decision in supporting it and the United Nation Resolution is correct. That a fraudulent declaration was filed. Saddam Hussein clearly was in violation of some 17 U.N. resolutions. He had tortured and killed tens of thousands of his own people and used chemical weapons against his own people, the Kurds and also against his neighbors. And the world is a far safer place with him gone.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghantistan; generalpace; hunter; intelcomm; iraq; military; nuclear; pakistan; rumsfeld; senate; senatorwarner

1 posted on 02/04/2004 7:32:30 PM PST by Calpernia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MJY1288; Calpernia; Grampa Dave; anniegetyourgun; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BOBTHENAILER; Jessamine; ...
Pro Military, Pro Coalition News!

Rumsfeld: First of all, I think it is important not to misrepresent what Dr. Kay has said. Dr. Kay has said a great many things. He has not filed an official written report it has been a oral report. He had indicated that he feels they are about 85 percent complete. General Dayton has the responsibility for running Iraq survey group. And Dr. Duelfer is going to be taking his place, though I have not met him yet. He, as well as Dr Kay both have excellent reputations and certainly General Dayton is doing a very good job. There is work yet to be done.

Private Mail to be added to or removed from the GNFI (or Pro-Coalition) ping list.

2 posted on 02/04/2004 7:34:02 PM PST by Calpernia (http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
------------------------------------------------------------January 23,2004-------------------- DCI ANNOUNCES DUELFER TO SUCCEED KAY AS SPECIAL ADVISOR

Director of Central Intelligence George J. Tenet announced today that Dr. David Kay will be stepping down as his Special Advisor for Strategy regarding Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Programs.

The DCI also announced that Dr. Kay will be succeeded by Charles A. Duelfer, who served as Deputy Executive Chairman of the UN Special Commission on Iraq (UNSCOM) from 1993 until its termination in 2000 and is currently a public policy scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

Duelfer, 51, will be working closely with Major General Keith W. Dayton, who commands the Iraq Survey Group (ISG).

Before joining UNSCOM in 1993, Duelfer was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for arms control and multilateral defense matters. From 1990 to 1992, he was in charge of defense trade matters as the Director of the Center for Defense Trade and deputy to the Assistant Secretary of State for Politico-Military Affairs. In this capacity, he had responsibility for arms transfers, munitions licensing, and conventional arms control.

Duelfer has a B.A. from the University of Connecticut and a M.Sc. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

3 posted on 02/04/2004 9:39:27 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Bump!
4 posted on 02/04/2004 9:41:32 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BARLF
This is going to be very interesting. I think they are going to eventually find the WMDs. I just hope it's in time to mean something for Bush and not when it's too late.
5 posted on 02/04/2004 9:51:13 PM PST by McGavin999 (Evil thrives when good men do nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
It's a big country and lots of sand. Most likely lots of spider holes,too. LOL

Perhaps someone can convince Saddam to draw a map with the promise of 72 virgins if the map leads to his WMD's

6 posted on 02/04/2004 10:01:25 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
The Senators (Levin and Kennedy )were really pounding Rumsfeld over everything they could think of on the WMD today in the Senate hearing.
7 posted on 02/04/2004 10:29:45 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Before C-SPAN cut away from the hearings, Rummy was verbally slapping Teddy Kennedy about what Bush supposedly "said".
8 posted on 02/04/2004 10:37:02 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Consort
I saw the replay so I got to see the full performance of Rumsfeld, damn he is good!
9 posted on 02/04/2004 10:55:40 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
So I think that a question that’s premised upon that assumption nothing has been found, which is not true, (inaudible) but nothing will be found would be a mistake.

If the Dems would stop ignoring Dr. Kay's initial report, they'd know much was found. aaaargh....I'm gonna go bald from pulling my hair out before this is settled once and for all.

I wish I'd seen Rummy today. I'll bet Kennedy's face was beet red by the time the hearing was over. LOL!

10 posted on 02/04/2004 11:09:47 PM PST by radu (May God watch over our troops and keep them safe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Bump!
11 posted on 02/04/2004 11:41:52 PM PST by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Rumsfeld ~ Bump!
12 posted on 02/05/2004 8:24:02 AM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: sanatanDharmi
~~ Bush/Cheney 2004 ~~

14 posted on 02/05/2004 9:40:09 AM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson