Here is the Discharge paper:
Posted on 02/11/2004 4:29:03 PM PST by WaterDragon
Selected excerpts:
For all their pretended confusion about the issue, both Kerry and Clark know from their own experience that no officer who had not met the requirements of his six year service obligation to the satisfaction of his unit commander would have been granted an honorable discharge....there was already an exhaustive look at Bush’s National Guard records published and available on the Internet to any reporter who has written on this in the last week from Katharine Seelye at The New York Times to Richard Cohen at The Washington Post… neither of whom seem to have looked it up.. It’s title? “The Real Military Record of George W. Bush: Not Heroic, But Not AWOL, Either.”
It was “the first full chronology… . Its basic conclusions… he did accumulate the days of service required of him for his ultimate honorable discharge.”
The article included the evidence of the pasteup pay records just released by the White House. It also included the material in the “two new documents obtained by the Globe” by Robinson from left wing activist Bob Fertig.
It was published four long years ago---just a few weeks before the 2000 Presidential election in George Magazine. Its publisher was that well-known GOP supporter-- the late John F. Kennedy, Jr.
Bookmarked ! Thanks ...
Here is the Discharge paper:
Oh, yeah. This CRA* came up in 1994 and in 2000. It's an issue they bring
up again to discredit a good and decent human being that they oppose.I have voted for George W. Bush every time he has run for office. I will do
so again November 2nd this year.There is ONLY ONE 'GOOD' Democrat. That is one that has been voted
OUT OF POWER !!!![Note my new tagline]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
