Posted on 02/19/2004 8:28:43 PM PST by jgrubbs
Isaiah wrote, “Therefore I have set my face like a flint” (Isa 50:7). The prophet is speaking of God’s Suffering Servant who has resolutely embarked upon an irreversible course. The New Testament says that our Lord “stedfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem” to endure the cross (Luke 9:51). Scholars tell us that the phrase “set one’s face” is a Hebraism implying fixedness of purpose, especially in the face of difficulty or danger. I imagine this is the mindset of our brave sons and daughters in Iraq as they set out on a dangerous convoy through the Sunni Triangle.
As for Jesus, He had chosen to enter upon the path before Him—a path of humiliation, suffering, and death in order to accomplish the divine plan of salvation. He knew the time had come when, after His suffering and resurrection, He would again be taken up and reinstated in His former glory with the Father and vested with the new glory He had won as Son of Man.
This Saturday, fully aware of the path awaiting him, Mr. Michael Peroutka will announce his candidacy for President of the United States. The decision to run for public office was not an easy one for this soft-spoken man. In his statement of candidacy he notes:
To say that I did not feel qualified to take on such a massive task is to engage in gross understatement. After prayer and serious consideration, I am convinced that the question of my qualification and competence is not solely within my power to judge. The uniqueness of this undertaking and the special demands that it requires, make it necessary to rely upon the judgment, experience and counsel of men who have trod this path before me. In short, if men like Howard Phillips and Jim Clymer are convinced that I can adequately represent the Constitution Party in such a fashion, then I must weigh their opinion and their vision as well as my own knowledge of the task and of my own strengths and shortcomings. In light of these considerations, and despite previous misgivings, I believe God has given me this duty to perform.
Mr. Peroutka entertains no illusions that his path will be easy or “successful” in the world’s eyes. He is simply carrying out to the best of his ability the will of God as he understands it:
[T]here are at least two distinct tasks against which competency must be judged. One is the running of a legitimate and appropriate candidacy. The second is the serving in office in the event that God would grant the victory. About the first I know almost nothing except that it will be a challenge that will test my knowledge, patience, energy, and stamina. I expect to take punches and I need to do so with equanimity and maintain the course despite attacks and setbacks. I am committed to this. Regarding the second, I feel a little more qualified. Although I am not well-schooled on every important issue, I do feel that I have an overall grasp of what a Constitutional Republic of Sovereign States based on Biblical principles would look like and I think, with practice, I can express this clearly and concisely. Applying these principles to every question of current events in a rapid-fire interview with good sound bites may not be my forte but I think I could actually do the work of the office if God gave it to me to do. Moreover, I am confident that if He gave it to me He would give me the resources and the help to carry out His will for me.
What does this mean for you and me? As voters, we are now faced with a viable alternative to the two-party monopoly that dominates American politics. And, like Mr. Peroutka, it is time to make a choice. Pastor Mark Dankof put it this way in a recent email:
What are your other voting options in the first Tuesday of November this fall? One will be a liberal Democrat, quite clearly the reincarnation of another Dukakis candidacy. The other will be Rockefeller Republican George W. Bush, who has given us 1) a Congressionally undeclared and preemptive foreign war in Iraq on the basis of fraudulent claims and evidence; 2) a never-ending and disastrous occupation of that country which continues to siphon billions of tax dollars and American lives with no end in sight; 3) a Leviathan federal budget of 2.3 trillion dollars with 500 billion dollar + deficits; 4) a catastrophic immigration policy which has given blanket amnesty to an additional 12 million illegal aliens in the United States; 5) a continuation of America-Last trade policies as outlined in NAFTA and GATT, designed to destroy the manufacturing base and sector of the American economy; and 6) ongoing capitulations in the Culture War to the anti-Christian, pro-abortion, and homosexual lobbies active within his own Party.
If you like these policies, Mr. Bush and/or his Democratic opponent are just for you. I accept this. But if you share my own anxiety about the future of America and the direction either King George or John Kerry of the People’s Republic of Massachusetts will set in the four years that follow this November’s election, please prayerfully consider Michael Peroutka as worthy of your vote as the next President of the United States. And tell as many of your friends and family members as you can of this important option I commend to you. There is indeed a viable alternative available. And let’s Reclaim our Republic.
A friend of mine recently asked me, “But I’ve never heard of Michael Peroutka. How in the world can a man without name recognition, personal connections, and access to resources be considered a viable candidate for president?” This is a legitimate question. But it has been answered by Mr. Howard Phillips, one of the founders of the Constitution Party. In an interview with Mark Dankof on World Net Daily, Mr. Phillips said this:
Christians, conservatives, Constitutionalists, will only be effective in politics when they begin with the standard, rather than beginning with the man. If you begin with the standard of God’s word, the Bible, if you begin with the political standard of the Constitution, and then assess the degree to which those who seek your support identify themselves with that which is required by the Bible and the Constitution, you are less likely to err. But there is no such thing as perfect discernment—we just do the best that we can.
In other words, not only does the Constitution Party put principle above politics; it puts principle above personality. This is as it should be.
Personally, I like the determination and humility I see in Mr. Peroutka. It reminds me of what the apostle Paul said in Acts 20:24. Although aware that bonds and afflictions awaited him, he declared, “But none of these things move me.” Paul had set his face. In Philippians 3:13 he tells us, “This one thing I do,” not “These many things I dabble in.” Yes, there are “those things which are behind,” and Paul is forgetting them. But there are also “those things which remain before,” and Paul is reaching forth unto them with every ounce of his God-given strength. All the land that remains to be possessed, all the service that remains for us to accomplish, all that is ours in Christ both as individuals and as a nation—let us reach for these while there is still time.
Today is the day to make up our minds on “this one thing.” It will help bring all other things in their proper relation to that. This is what Mr. Peroutka has had the courage to do, and that is what we must do.
Set your face like a flint and you, too, shall never be ashamed.
David Alan Black is the editor of www.daveblackonline.com. His latest book, Why I Stopped Listening to Rush: Confessions of a Recovering Neocon, will be released this year.
Free Republic is an online gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web.
What exactly makes FR "independent" or "grass-roots"? Looking at the kinds of posts that get many true conservatives banned, one could reasonably conclude that FR is simply another campaign tool of the Republican Party. You and many other memebers have specifically stated that our main goal and focus is to "vote out the 'rats." We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America.
I understand that your pasison in pursuing this, but how is supporting a party that has made government bigger and spent more money than Bill Clinton help "further conservatism"? And we always have fun doing it.
Perhaps, but can you see how banning members like jgrubbs for this thread might be interpreted as the action of someone who is not "having fun"?
It is my opinion that the statement on FR's homepage is somewhat misleading. If you want FR to be a weapon used in 'rat extermination, with its ultimate goal to get Republicans into office, why not just say that up front? It might save you the trouble of banning those who feel just as passionately about defending the Constitution but have different views about how to accomplish that.
Exactly, and what's more even if the Republicans have one more senator than the Ds, it means Rs are in control and have their people in place as committee chairs. Do you think there would ever be ONE piece of pro-life legislation getting past a Democrat committee chair? Not on your life. Pro-life Democrats are useless unless they're in the minority.
Of course, action can be taken against unconstitutional actions by the government. That's the purpose of the Supreme Court and the balance of powers. The wheels may turn slowly but they usually do turn.
As I said it won't happen in this election, it may not happen in two election cycles. However sooner or later, either the Democrats will go off the deep end, or the Republicans will move too far to the left, and then no amount of pressure will be able to stop a third or even fourth party from being elected into more powerful positions.
I agree, I just don't think that time is now.
Except the fact that on certain situations, even when the Supreme Court may rule correctly on issues of constitutionality, if it doesn't mesh with 'conservative' belief, some would expect us to turn against them. For instance the issue with Padilla. Mind you, I would probably vote to have this guy hung, but constitutionally as a citizen of his respective state he does have rights. According to some around here, to suggest such a thing is tantamount to being a liberal. But I would expect the 5 conservative judges in this instance to rule against the administration. That issue was already decided in Milligan
I agree, I just don't think that time is now.
When then? When would be an appropriate time to voice your consternation against the politicians that call themselves our leaders? Give me a time when I, as a citizen of the state of North Carolina, can oppose excessive government spending, centralization of power in Washington DC, and the national government overstepping its bounds? Perhaps when Republicans are firmly in control and still continue the move to the left and just pandering to the right? By then, unfortunately, it will be too late
No one I know is going to believe that.
They might believe that it is ploy by the owners of the Dem/GOP to explain their dwindling number of followers, but that does not explain the dwindling number of eligible voters who actually vote for those national candidates.
Instead of fighting for change within the Republican party you instead whine and threaten to support a candidate who'll likely get less than 1% of the overall popular vote.
What hard reality?
What do you suggest good Republican followers do when they see that the national GOP has thumbed their nose at them (CFR, etc.)? Nothing so far has been successful. How is it they have hope for future progress or are they just holding on long enough hoping they get through life without becoming victims of some socialist oligarchy and the future be damned.
I said I didn't think NOW was the time that a third party would win.
By all means, express your consternation. Call them, write them, protest, vote for the most conservative congresscritter possible.
If you're in a state where the outcome isn't in doubt, you can even afford to vote third party. But if you're in a swing state, be aware that voting third party is likely to throw the outcome to the person you want least.
With all due respect, you and your friends don't have to believe it for it to be true.
Millions of people around the world believe theirs is the only true religion. They can't all be correct.
Was the President correct to ban partial birth abortion, eliminate funding for abortions overseas, cut taxes, and reject Kyoto?
Voter dissatisfaction with the whole Dem/GOP mess seems to be as high as it has ever been in my lifetime. Why do you say that.
I take it you were born after 1992?
With all due respect, you and your friends adoption of such a belief does not make it true.
Bones a thrown by the lord of the manor to chained dogs but that also does not explain such a political affront directed at the governed in America.
YOU are the one basing your beliefs on the opinions of people around you.
I'm basing my opinion on election and polling results, which show a fairly divided America.
I did not anticipate a humorous response.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.