Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Wisconsin Attorney General) Lautenschlager arrested for DUI
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel ^ | Feb. 24, 2004 | STEVEN WALTERS

Posted on 02/24/2004 10:12:54 AM PST by mafree

Madison - State Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager said today that she was arrested for drunken driving in Dodge County while returning to her Fond du Lac home from the Capitol on Monday.

Lautenschlager, 48, said in a statement that she had made a "terrible mistake" and added: "While driving home, I fell asleep and drove off the road, and was subsequently cited for operating a vehicle while intoxicated."

In her statement, she promised to "accept the consequences of and will take responsibility for my actions."

According to the Dodge County sheriff's report on the arrest, Lautenschlager refused to take a test to determine her blood-alcohol level.

She was driving a state-owned car when she was arrested.

Lautenschlager, whose office works closely with local and state police agencies and operates state crime labs, thanked Dodge County officers in her statement "for their professionalism in handling this matter."

She has been released from custody.

A Democrat, she is a former state legislator and U.S. attorney appointed by former President Clinton. She was elected the state's first female attorney general in 2002.

An aide said Lautenschlager was not available for comment today.

Lautenschlager commutes to the Capitol from her Fond du Lac home and usually drives alone to state appearances. As a former federal prosecutor, whose spouse is a retired law enforcement officer, Lautenschlager has received considerable political backing from law officers.

More details of her arrest were not immediately available.

Complete coverage of this story will appear online later today and in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel in the morning.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: attorneygeneral; democrat; dui; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last
To: MarketR
"In her statement, she promised to "accept the consequences of and will take responsibility for my actions."

I think the Dims have learned something from Clinton after all.....Admit it and take the consequences.

I bet she gets off light.

When Democrats say they will take responsibility, it never seems to result in their resignation from office. Let's compare her, Chvala, Clinton etal to Livingston, Gingrich and Packwood.

101 posted on 02/24/2004 1:58:21 PM PST by gorush (Tag! You're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
Actually, the headline would have been...

Republican AG Joe Blow Smith caught driving drunk

You see, some people might not know what DUI or (R) is (and it would be bigger, but that's the largest font available in HTML).

102 posted on 02/24/2004 2:01:31 PM PST by steveegg (You don't clean up 8 years of messes in 4, only to turn it over to Pigpen - W'04))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mafree
You take the job of AG of a state, but you're not prepared to call a cab if you're drunk? If this woman had any shame, she'd resign.

Notice that the article doesn't say anything about the police obtaining a warrant and drawing blood without her consent. She failed a *roadside* breathalyzer test, but that isn't admissible in court. The police can obtain a warrant and draw blood without consent given PC, which might include a failed roadside breathalyzer test. Again, though, no mention of that in this article.

Standard procedure for the WSP, do you think? Or perhaps if an ordinary serf had the wherewithal to refuse a blood/urine/breath test the police might have been more diligent in gathering evidence? And what do you think this Democrat AG would have had her attack dogs say to the judge in court about a citizen who acted as she has?

103 posted on 02/24/2004 2:05:44 PM PST by Timm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dmz
it's in there in black and white, but you do actually have to read it first (before you comment).

Yeap, I noticed it after I posted. That is what I get for reading it right after teaching 30 twelve year olds.

104 posted on 02/24/2004 2:07:00 PM PST by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mafree
Apparently she is trying to put herself on the fast track for national office with the Democratic Party.

Maybe she thinks this will make her Vice Presidential material for JK.
105 posted on 02/24/2004 2:08:40 PM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mafree
Had to read 75% of the article to find out she is a DemonCrap. If it was a republican it would have been part of the headline.
106 posted on 02/24/2004 2:11:11 PM PST by semaj ("....by their fruit you will know them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semaj
They didn't bother mentioning her political affiliation until the 17th paragraph, 4th from the end. We need to archive this article for it's blatant bias!
107 posted on 02/24/2004 2:19:15 PM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: BraveMan
Get ready for "the seatbelt and airbag saved my life."
108 posted on 02/24/2004 2:20:47 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
You see, some people might not know what DUI or (R) is (and it would be bigger, but that's the largest font available in HTML).

You've got that right....

109 posted on 02/24/2004 2:20:54 PM PST by Arrowhead1952 (WARNING! DumbocRATs never met a tax increase they didn't like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: EODGUY
No, not smart to refuse the breathalyzer. She can get convicted on various tests etc., and yes, the cops CAN forcefully draw blood from you. The best policy is to cooperate fully. You will then get the lightest (most likely) sentence if you have a clean record. Here in Indiana you will receive a mandatory 90 day license suspension or 30 day susp with 180 day "restricted" license, which allows you to go to work ONLY. The refusal implies total guilt and may REQUIRE a full year suspension. Let me tell you a 90 day suspension SUCKS. I can't imagine a full year suspension.
110 posted on 02/24/2004 2:34:40 PM PST by boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: BraveMan
"A Democrat..."

First off, out of the (approximately) 255 words this article uses, it took 154 words before the writer revealed the political party this gal's affilitated with.

Since it's well known most people never read beyond the first paragraph of any article it begs the question, is it an accident the word "Democrat" appears 60% into the artcle?
You make that call for yourself Braveman, I've spent too many years studying the mo of the urinalist-creeps, so I know the answer.

"...she is a former state legislator and U.S. attorney appointed by former President Clinton. She was elected the state's first female attorney general in 2002."

HA!!
One of those *gifted* ones selected to fill a vacancy when Clintigula fired every single U.S.Attorney, eh?
So, what were the planks this gal ran on in '02 that landed her in Madtown, anyway?
"Law & Order"? :o)

"An aide said Lautenschlager was not available for comment today."

~& of course the disgusting Liberal-Socialst quisling from the Milwaukee Urinal-Sentenal said, "Oh. Well OK."

Let's have some fun & rewrite that first paragraph & pretend the broad were a Repub, shall we?

"Madison - State Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager, a Republican who enjoyed support from Wisconsin's law enforcement community during the election due to her husband's standing as a retired high ranking law enforcement official, said today that she was arrested for drunken driving in Dodge County while returning to her Fond du Lac home from the Capitol on Monday. Lautenschlager ran on a strict platform of toughening Wisconsin's existing drunk driving laws."

See?
The LIberal-Socialist smear machine game's easy!

...in fact, it's *child's* play. ;^)

111 posted on 02/24/2004 2:45:46 PM PST by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
Yeah...If she were a repub it would have led the headline.
112 posted on 02/24/2004 3:01:26 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
""Guns for me and not for thee"

Yes, most of them are. She's a ditzy leftist, so I don't really know.

I do know it's illegal to handle firearms while intoxicated. Most other folks would have had their vehicles searched.

Guilty of a Class A misdemeanor if...941.20(1)(b) Operates or goes armed with a firearm while he or she is under the influence of an intoxicant.

113 posted on 02/24/2004 3:34:22 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
I believe he would have been listed as passenger if he had been in the car.

Also, the car was towed. If he had been sober enough to be the responsible party to whom she was released, why wouldn't he have driven? The narrative also states she was driven to Beaver Dam in order to be released to her husband. If he was in the car, why couldn't she have been released where they were? I also believe that the narrative would have mentioned transporting both her and her husband.

They got his info because he was the person she was released to.
114 posted on 02/24/2004 3:57:52 PM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Chummy
Looking at the incident report it appears she also lied on her drivers license. If she's 135 lbs, I'm Kate Moss!
115 posted on 02/24/2004 4:17:02 PM PST by wisconsinconservative ("The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: mafree
A woman and not driving an SUV?

She'll make out fine.
116 posted on 02/24/2004 4:17:24 PM PST by unspun (The uncontextualized life is not worth living. | I'm not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
She supposedly registered at 1.2 but claims she only had a couple glasses of wine.

She is a Democrat. By definition, she is a liar.

117 posted on 02/24/2004 4:19:54 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chummy
what leaps off the screen is that she only says her terrible mistake appears to be driving off the road.


I know many people who have occasionally driven when they shouldn't have (at least one of these people I am VERY close to, and he hasn't done it often or recently - VERY close, mind you) and NONE of them have ever driven a car off the road or gotten into an accident when taking this risk.

She must have done some sobering up before they drew 0.12 from her vein.
118 posted on 02/24/2004 4:40:18 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: mafree
Biskupic BUMP. Lautenschlager is just another politician she doesn't care about enforcing laws.
119 posted on 02/24/2004 5:25:51 PM PST by ServesURight (FReecerely Yours,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chummy
Bud Weiser
120 posted on 02/24/2004 5:38:47 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson