To: chance33_98
When was gay marraige passed in Sodom and Gomorrah?
To: chance33_98
Guess the next step in all these cities is an endless line of court challenges regarding visitation, custody rights, banking, insurance, inheritance, property titles, ad infinitum...
They are going to keep this in the courts and force it.
3 posted on
02/27/2004 8:58:39 AM PST by
OpusatFR
(Kerrycrats are the Know-Nothings of the 21st Century)
To: chance33_98
Pardon my ignorance, but isn't a planned, organized effort to violate the law called conspiracy? If any actual organization becomes involved, then doesn't RICO apply?
4 posted on
02/27/2004 8:59:25 AM PST by
kevkrom
(Ask your Congresscritter about his or her stance on HR 25 -- the NRST)
To: Chi-townChief
You've got the ping list, Chief....
5 posted on
02/27/2004 9:00:26 AM PST by
unspun
(The uncontextualized life is not worth living. | I'm not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate.)
To: chance33_98
If the Winnetka town clerk was pasing out handguns, to get the perceived handgun ban tested, I imagine he would be stopped.
Don't you?
7 posted on
02/27/2004 9:04:46 AM PST by
Jim Noble
(Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
To: chance33_98
These "marriage licenses" do not violate the law, since the "marriage" of the individuals named on the "license" is void, both in the natural law and by the state law which gives it voice.
It will violate the law to treat two men or two women who have gone through a sham ceremony as if they were married, which is of course impossible.
The licenses, per se, are meaningless.
8 posted on
02/27/2004 9:07:44 AM PST by
Jim Noble
(Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson