Skip to comments.
Killing germs, reducing waste, making oil: TDP might be the next big thing
USA Today ^
| 1/22/2004
| Andrew Kantor
Posted on 02/28/2004 9:46:17 PM PST by grundle
Edited on 04/13/2004 1:42:01 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
This was going to be a column about oil. Instead, it's also about disease, poison, and a cool way to get rid of both. Actually, it's about a new technology — a new process that is going to make a Difference. One that's going to change things, and one you're going to be hearing a lot more about.
(Excerpt) Read more at usatoday.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: doomsayers; energy; energylist; enviralists; environment; environmentalists; oil; tdp
After you have read the above article, if you want a really, really good laugh, read this:
http://tinyurl.com/3yt7q
1
posted on
02/28/2004 9:46:18 PM PST
by
grundle
To: *Enviralists; *Energy_List
I thought you might like to see this.
2
posted on
02/28/2004 9:50:27 PM PST
by
grundle
To: grundle
Interesting, but flawed.
American beef have not been "cannibal" for several years as it has been illegal to use bio-products in cattle feed at least that long.
Fairly light treatment of the subject, much better post have appeared here in the past.
3
posted on
02/28/2004 10:06:39 PM PST
by
Richard-SIA
(Nuke the U.N!)
To: grundle
4
posted on
02/28/2004 10:06:56 PM PST
by
stylin_geek
(Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
To: grundle
Oh man, that link was great. The link goes to a DU forum where their discussing the peaking of oil production and how it will destroy the world.
Here was the most eye-popping post. One person responded:
"If the information I have today had been a blip on my radar screen 15 years ago, I never would have made the decision to have children. Never.
Not only would I have understood the dire importance of reproductive responsibility in the face of such a crisis, I would not have knowingly inflicted such a potentially wretched future on my own children. I thought I was being responsible when I made the decision to have only
two children. Your responsibility [to have no children] is certainly appreciated."
Man, I hope this person's kids never got to see this. Can you imagine if you knew that your parents wished you had never been born?
To: grundle
TDP is good if it's supported by liberal rats. If supported by conservatives then it's Doomed, DOOMED.
6
posted on
02/28/2004 10:24:24 PM PST
by
TLOne
(All the terrorists want is for us to bow and worship their god. Oh, and let them rule.)
To: grundle
How much energy goes into the "thermal" part of this process,,,where does it come from?
7
posted on
02/28/2004 10:33:02 PM PST
by
Waco
To: grundle
bump
8
posted on
02/28/2004 10:44:52 PM PST
by
GOPJ
(NFL Fatcats: Grown men don't watch hollywood peep shows with wives and children.)
To: Waco
The key question!
9
posted on
02/28/2004 11:08:48 PM PST
by
Weirdad
(A Free Republic, not a "democracy" (mob rule))
To: grundle; farmfriend
fyi
10
posted on
02/28/2004 11:20:29 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: grundle; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ..
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
11
posted on
02/28/2004 11:25:55 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: Waco; grundle
This process was in last May's (2003) Discover Magazine. I think the title was something like "Anything into oil". I remember it well because I was curious about where to buy the stock after reading the article.
They quoted $10 per barrel to start off. There were 3 bi-products of the proscess...oil was one. All were relatively ,harmless.
Anything but radioactive elements can be broken down. Pretty amazing. You will need to read the article, as I don't remember the details.
12
posted on
02/28/2004 11:36:44 PM PST
by
TheLion
To: TheLion
Hazardous chemical elements (mercury, arsenic, lead, etc.) won't be eliminated by this process. It's not just the radioactive stuff. The pollution issues are similar to those of incineration of waste for energy.
To: grundle
"
Specifically, TDP turns just about anything into oil and fertilizer. And when I say "anything," I mean that: animal waste, medical waste, human waste. Used diapers, used computers, used tires. Anything that's not radioactive can be tossed into the hopper."So "anything" can be Thermally De-Polymerized? Sure would like to see it try to de-polymerize a thermosetting resin like the old phenol-formaldehydes. They are so stable that they can be buried in the earth for years without any degradation at all.
I.E., I'll believe it when I see it. You will notice that the author of this article goes flying off the handle, talking about how we won't need to import any more oil, and he has no knowledge at all about how this process works.
Typical liberal. Both feet firmly planted in the air!
To: grundle
As an executive in the waste management business, I can't put it any more simply than this: snake oil!
Looks like some poor hapless reporter with a deadline to make and no time for research got sucked into a scam that's been ongoing for over 30 years. Whether it's called plasma arc technology, laser incineration, or TDP, it's claptrap nonsense intended to scare the ignorant and generate expensive gov't funded studies.
15
posted on
02/28/2004 11:41:54 PM PST
by
Mudcat
To: HiTech RedNeck
"Hazardous chemical elements (mercury, arsenic, lead, etc.) won't be eliminated by this process. It's not just the radioactive stuff"
You may be right but that is not what I remember reading. I'll try to find the article and get back to you.
16
posted on
02/28/2004 11:43:00 PM PST
by
TheLion
To: TheLion
It's still young & undeveloped, like the oil industry was over a hundred years ago when they threw gasoline away as a waste product of making lamp oil.
When they wake up to using higher pressure with catalytic isomerization among other processes, the sky's the limit.
17
posted on
02/29/2004 12:07:02 AM PST
by
norraad
("What light!">Blues Brothers)
To: grundle; Avoiding_Sulla; farmfriend; Dog Gone
A word of caution about bio-diesel. You will recall the way MTBE resulted in an 85% increase in asthma cases. Dr. Peter Joseph, a leader in the fight against MTBE and in the study of its impact on respiratory ailments, believes that the culprit may have been methyl nitrate, a byproduct of the combustion of MTBE. He believes that there is good reason to suspect that combustion of bio-diesel will also produce methyl nitrate.
If anything appears to be too good to be true, it probably is.
18
posted on
02/29/2004 12:10:26 AM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(And the Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.)
To: norraad
I think they might be trying all kinds of things with this process. It's one problem, is that it just sounds too good to be true. That will make many turn away and not go any further.
I predict someone will be paying for our garbage or at least hauling it away for free. if and when, this gets going bigtime.
The article "Anything into oil" is over at Discover.com but you need to be a subscriber or pay for the article.
19
posted on
02/29/2004 12:18:40 AM PST
by
TheLion
To: grundle
I could see animal waste, but how do you turn a computer into oil?
20
posted on
02/29/2004 12:22:06 AM PST
by
Husker24
To: Waco
If it really could produce as much oil as it says, then it should become self sufficiant after a short while.
21
posted on
02/29/2004 12:23:25 AM PST
by
Husker24
To: TheLion
Yeah, I understand, I also understand industrial chemical processing is futurizing by leaps & bounds beyond what the old fogies thought was possible.
It's very exciting & I wish them good luck.
22
posted on
02/29/2004 12:23:47 AM PST
by
norraad
("What light!">Blues Brothers)
To: grundle
Hmmmmm....Gonna run this by the local Chemistry brain, see what he thinks.
To: Waco
There was an article on this about a year ago posted here on FR. The system is only about 50-70% efficient. However we're talking trash here. If 30-50% is used to generate the power and 50-70% become oil (and other materials), do we really care about the lost 30-50%?
It's not a free lunch, but the cost is something we want to get rid of anyway. It would be a good deal if it was on 20% efficient.
24
posted on
02/29/2004 12:50:00 AM PST
by
JosephW
To: grundle
25
posted on
02/29/2004 1:58:02 AM PST
by
Bobber58
(whatever it takes, for as long as it takes)
To: Our man in washington
I wish that person had decided to not have children also.
To: TheLion
I saved the one you remember reading, remarking that time would tell if this was an inefficient source or, if it was a technology before it's time. Hype does not overcome reality. This is the first article on the subject that I've seen since the first one, and it remains to be seen what sort of technology this is. The first article even went so far as to say the facility itself was not very expensive to build, or would be recouped easily by profit of production.
So, one article every six or eight months to describe a miracle. I'm waiting.
27
posted on
02/29/2004 2:32:29 AM PST
by
wita
(truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!
28
posted on
02/29/2004 3:04:40 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: grundle
"Dioxins and PCBs are two particularly nasty kinds of chemical. Right now, we don't really dispose of what we make; we burn or bury it, which means it ends up forgotten but not gone." This article has more inaccuracies per square inch than any "science" article I have seen in quite a while. The sentence above is just one example. Sorry, Mr. Kantor, but properly burning dioxins and PCB's DOES destroy them, and they are indeed GONE.
This isn't to say the TDP is not a good idea, but, please, folks, lets not let the hyperbole get out of hand.
To: leadpenny
I wish that person had decided to not have children also. The real shame is his/her parents didn't make the decision not to have children. Then this poor soul wouldn't be spending his/her adulthood regretting his/her children. Can anything be worse?
30
posted on
02/29/2004 4:06:20 AM PST
by
laredo44
(liberty is not the problem)
To: grundle
Good Sunday morning laugh.
I did the same thing with coal, a few years back. Now I have all the diamonds I will ever need.
And no, you can't have any
31
posted on
02/29/2004 4:12:31 AM PST
by
G.Mason
(The trouble with practical jokes is that very often they get elected -- Will Rogers)
To: Waco
32
posted on
02/29/2004 9:17:04 AM PST
by
grundle
To: TheLion
The article "Anything into oil" is over at Discover.com but you need to be a subscriber or pay for the article. Here's another article that looks very much like the original "Discover" article".
Here's an old FR thread discussing it at the time the article originally came out.
For more, search on titles containg both the words "turkey" and "oil".
33
posted on
02/29/2004 9:22:14 AM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(...and Freedom tastes of Reality)
To: grundle
WOW !
34
posted on
02/29/2004 9:39:51 AM PST
by
Jimbaugh
(They will not get away with this. Developing . . . . .)
To: TheLion
The article "Anything into oil" is over at Discover.com but you need to be a subscriber or pay for the article. Here's an old link to the same article posted on FR... Anything Into Oil
35
posted on
02/29/2004 10:20:51 AM PST
by
Gritty
("Iraq's like the Wild West, but nobody's the sheriff"-Kelly McCann)
To: grundle
Apparently the Conagra Turkey processing plant was to be on line about the end of July, last year. And there is no word anywhere I can seem to find out about it since then, except some management changes at its process developer's company in February.
Strange - perhaps it is going the way of the Fish carbuerator.
From all kinds of anticipation, to not even a mention or link between Conagra and Carthage on the web.
36
posted on
02/29/2004 5:13:56 PM PST
by
XBob
To: HiTech RedNeck
37
posted on
02/29/2004 10:26:33 PM PST
by
TheLion
To: TheLion
Oh, that pesky periodic table. Oil is carbon and hydrogen. Lotsa other elements to deal with, and for that matter a dearth of hydrogen to go with all the carbon.
To: Gritty
Thanks for the link. The posts were interesting to read!
39
posted on
02/29/2004 10:41:55 PM PST
by
TheLion
To: DuncanWaring
Thanks for the links. Lots of interesting reading! Looks like they kept this private to prevent take-overs. Too bad we can't invest in it.
I have yet to find any downside outside of man-made regulations and wacko groups who may not approve of it.
Oil companies don't need to fear it because they can buy the oil cheap.
Waste disposal companies can sell them waste to go though the process. Companies that have waste will gladly give it to these guys rather than paying a fortune to dispose of it.
40
posted on
02/29/2004 10:59:05 PM PST
by
TheLion
To: wita
"So, one article every six or eight months to describe a miracle. I'm waiting"
Hope you will read all the links posted on this thread. I think this process is a certified winner!
41
posted on
02/29/2004 11:01:53 PM PST
by
TheLion
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson