Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Must Pass the Fair Tax Act
CNSNews.com ^ | February 27, 2004 | Mac Collins (R-GA)

Posted on 03/02/2004 10:23:45 PM PST by esarlls3

Congress Must Pass the Fair Tax Act
By U.S. Rep. Mac Collins
CNSNews.com Commentary
February 27, 2004

Past Congresses have moved in the wrong direction by making our tax laws more complex and expensive for business and individuals to comply with. To keep our economy growing, Congress needs to take action now.

My colleague, Georgia Republican Congressman John Linder, has sponsored the "Fair Tax Act" (H.R. 25), a national retail sales tax on new goods and services. It would replace all individual and corporate income taxes, payroll taxes as well as capital gains taxes, estate taxes and gift taxes.

The Fair Tax replaces the way we are currently taxed, which is based on our annual income, with a tax on goods and services. The Fair Tax, basically, is a voluntary "consumption" tax. The more you buy, the more you pay in taxes. The less you buy, the less you pay in taxes.

The federal government will continue to be fully funded, including Social Security and Medicare.

The Fair Tax will reduce the costs of goods and services by 20 to 30 percent. It will allow workers to keep 100 percent of their paycheck, pension and Social Security payments with the exception being state or local withholding

The Gross Domestic Product will increase by almost 10.5 percent in the first year after its enactment because real wages would increase and tax compliance costs for business would decrease by 90 percent.

The fair tax would also be good news for investors. Real investment will initially increase by 76 percent relative to investments that would be made under our present tax laws. While this increase will gradually decline, it remains 15 percent higher than under the existing tax structure.

American exports will increase by 26 percent initially and would remain more than 13 percent above present levels under the current tax system.

Studies of the Fair Tax have shown that many U.S. companies will choose expansion here in the United States versus abroad, and in turn the United States will become more attractive to many foreign owned companies looking for expansion possibilities.

President Bush, during his State of the Union address in January, said the economy is turning around because the American people are using their money far better than government would have. The Republican majority in Congress was right to return it to the American people and not keep it in Washington.

A fresh and a fairer approach to a Federal tax system is needed. Therefore, it is time for Congress to pass the Fair Tax (H.R. 25).

As a cosponsor of the Fair Tax Act, I have asked Chairman Thomas of the Ways and Means Committee to hold hearings on this vital legislation. I am hoping those hearings will get under way in the near future.

(Congressman Mac Collins is a Republican representing Georgia's 8th Congressional District. He serves on the House Ways and Means Committee and the House Select Committee on Intelligence.)


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: axixofevil; fairtax; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-334 next last
To: esarlls3
I am all for that!

I hope that maybe in Bush's second term they can seriously address this.

I totally agree that the sales tax is the only fair tax -- and think of all the time we wouldn't have to spend working on the income tax, and all the bureaucrats we wouldn't have to pay.
21 posted on 03/02/2004 11:01:02 PM PST by FairOpinion ("It's the judges, stupid." Re-elect Bush, send more Republicans to Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
BINGO! But power is a very seductive drug...
22 posted on 03/02/2004 11:02:25 PM PST by null and void (Pay no attention to the ones and zeros behind the curtain, and they'll return the favor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Please add me to your taxreform ping list.

Thanks. I appreciate it.
23 posted on 03/02/2004 11:02:42 PM PST by FairOpinion ("It's the judges, stupid." Re-elect Bush, send more Republicans to Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Oh, but I do. I've never missed an election in 32 years. I have yet to vote for anyone who won, though...

Course one can continue to pick for perfection and get nothing.

But power is a very seductive drug...

LOL, I don't think you are in much danger yet.

24 posted on 03/02/2004 11:07:31 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Hmmmmm. I guess not...
25 posted on 03/02/2004 11:08:55 PM PST by null and void (Pay no attention to the 1's and 0's behind the voting booth curtain, and they'll return the favor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: esarlls3
This will help stop the OUTSOURCING of AMerican jobs THAT IS BLEEDING THE COUNTRY TO DEATH! BUSH PAY ATTENTION!!!
26 posted on 03/02/2004 11:09:44 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 31R1O

What can I do to get the message out?

FR's a good place to start and to learn, followed up by informing family, friends, associates, anyone who will listen.

Check out these folks,

http://www.fairtax.org or http://www.salestax.org

Either will be more than happy to have you participate at any level suits you, they have materials, congressional mailing lists, phone numbers etc.

27 posted on 03/02/2004 11:13:45 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
You're added to it :O)
28 posted on 03/02/2004 11:15:38 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: esarlls3
I wish, I wish , I wish..........
29 posted on 03/02/2004 11:18:11 PM PST by SeeRushToldU_So (Don't expect much from people and you won't be disappointed. Sometimes you will be pleasantly surpri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Thanks!

I think the time is becoming ripe for some major overhaul of the tax system, and I personally think the best system is indeed the "fair tax" sales tax system.
30 posted on 03/02/2004 11:19:57 PM PST by FairOpinion ("It's the judges, stupid." Re-elect Bush, send more Republicans to Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: esarlls3
The Fair Tax will reduce the costs of goods and services by 20 to 30 percent.

Bullshit, it's a lie and it's mathematically impossible.Taxes are imposed on gains and profits. Anyone still in business knows they aren't paying 20 to 30 percent of their gross in federal income tax.

Service employee's will get 100% of their paycheck(s) too, which part of a service will be reduced 20 to 30 percent?

What we do know is prices would go UP 30%..

"The federal government will continue to be fully funded, including Social Security and Medicare." and you'll be able to save your money like never before, prices will be reduced 20 to 30%, AND, in addition to all that pie in the sky BS, every household will get a magic check in the mail every month from the government to boot...right.

31 posted on 03/03/2004 12:03:49 AM PST by lewislynn (The successful globalist employee will be the best educated, working for the lowest possible wage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurVirgo
I, for one, like it. If the tax incentive of moving a business overseas disappears, maybe we can keep more jobs here

Why would the same administration praising the exodus of jobs as good for America want to stop them with a radical change in the tax system?

Don't you know the exodus of jobs will raise the standard of living for all Americans?...We're all gonna be CEO's soon...Let the little people worry about THEIR taxes.

32 posted on 03/03/2004 12:08:27 AM PST by lewislynn (The successful globalist employee will be the best educated, working for the lowest possible wage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Ghod I wish you were wrong, and an a-hole...
33 posted on 03/03/2004 12:16:04 AM PST by null and void (Pay no attention to the 1's and 0's behind the voting booth curtain, and they'll return the favor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

Bullshit, it's a lie and it's mathematically impossible.Taxes are imposed on gains and profits. Anyone still in business knows they aren't paying 20 to 30 percent of their gross in federal income tax.

You overlook payroll taxes lewislynn, which are also repealed under the NRST. The combination of repeal of both income and payroll taxes along with the reductions of the costs complying with those taxes make up the reductions in producer goods that make reduction in retail prices possible.

The following article covers the mechanism on how the current Federal tax system propagates and is embedded into consumption expenditure.

DO YOU PAY YOUR INCOME TAX
AT THE SUPERMARKET?

by D. Sherman Cox J.D. L.L.M. Taxation

The 24% in the article considers only those factors actually paid to government out of imposititions on business in complying with the income, payroll, excise & tariff tax laws.

I refer you to the section of the following article about the Income/Payroll tax system and its impact on our economy "A. Hidden Upstream Taxes. " paragraph 39.

"[39] Dr. Dale Jorgenson, Chairman of Harvard University's Economics Department, believes that the price of goods and services are inflated by about 20 percent or more by upstream taxes consumers ultimately bear. In a recent paper Dr. Jorgenson estimated the built-in taxes contained in the price of goods and services. /22/ In the chart above, he quantified the hidden component of tax, estimating that producer prices would fall on repeal of upstream taxes an average of about 22 percent."

Looking at the accompanying chart, the range of values from industry to industry appears to be about 12-25%.

Economists Gary and Aldonna Robbins of the Texas-based Institute for Public Policy examined the case of dry cleaning a shirt, with a particular eye toward uncovering the hidden costs of taxes in price.

The Robbin's attributed over 33.6% of "consumer prices" to be due to federal taxation passed on to the customer.

The Federal Tax System
http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=2125&sequence=0&from=1#pt1

From the Table 1 we may extract the proportionate contributions of each sector of taxes as they contribute to consumer price for the year 2000.

Those tax components which will not change prices as a consequence of enactment of HR25

============================

Adjust for the approximate reduction of interest & cost of tax compliance (

Adjust for a conservative $800 billion cost of tax compliance, Payne '95 estimates 65cents for each dollar of revenue collected, $1264billion) reductions .

Estimated change in consumption prices as consequence of enactment of a National Retail Sales Tax, repealing all business income and payroll taxes:

33.6*(1386.5/1945) = 23.9% reduction in consumption prices

Which more than verifies the Jorgenson empirical study of 22% fall in producer prices.

The two sources are in reasonable agreement, and I see 20-25% a reasonable value to expect retail prices to fall, not only for customers here in the United States, but in our exports as well making them far more competitive on international markets.

34 posted on 03/03/2004 12:17:14 AM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: esarlls3
Bad idea. If you think the income tax code is long and complex, just wait until politicians get a hold of a national sales tax code!

Don't believe me? Just look at the one in your state if you have a sales tax. The code is so full of meddling and special amendments it's not funny.

Does anyone really want Congress to decide what can and cannot be taxed as a product? Do you even understand the questions that would arise?

Do you tax food? Medicine? Women's monthly hygiene products? Hair care products for blacks?

All of those and even thousands more would be in play for changes in the rate, what should or not should be taxed, etc.

Then the Dems would want a "progressive rate" on "luxury items" and charge more sales tax for buying a BMW over a simple Chevy.

Believe me, you don't want 435 members of Congress making policy on this. It would make the income tax code look lame in comparison.
35 posted on 03/03/2004 12:21:23 AM PST by Fledermaus (John Kerry is simply a liar. The man can't differentiate campaign rhetoric with facts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby
Actually, I could see this having a real chance of passing. Why? Because as incomes have dropped like a rock in this great economy, tax receipts have dropped as well. Meanwhile, people keep getting into debt and consuming like crazy. Since so many people don't have much of an income to tax any longer, the government will do what any robber does, and "go where the money is".

The government thinks just like Willie Sutton did, when asked why he robbed banks he replied "because that's where the money is".
36 posted on 03/03/2004 12:21:23 AM PST by Elliott Jackalope (We send our kids to Iraq to fight for them, and they send our jobs to India. Now THAT'S gratitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
His second post OTOH...
37 posted on 03/03/2004 12:21:56 AM PST by null and void (Pay no attention to the 1's and 0's behind the voting booth curtain, and they'll return the favor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
Believe me, you don't want 435 members of Congress making policy on this. It would make the income tax code look lame in comparison.

Yes, but it would be much fairer for decades. When it gets too bad we replace it with a simpler flat income tax...

38 posted on 03/03/2004 12:24:50 AM PST by null and void (Pay no attention to the 1's and 0's behind the voting booth curtain, and they'll return the favor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Sorry, I disagree. As I said, just go read your state's sales tax code.

It's not even close to "fair".
39 posted on 03/03/2004 12:25:52 AM PST by Fledermaus (John Kerry is simply a liar. The man can't differentiate campaign rhetoric with facts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
Yes, but the sales tax code has had decades of meddling on an originally simple and fair system.

Time to burn the system down and rebuild a new one from the ashes.

Any new system will start out simple, and stay that way for a while, before it, in it's turn, needs to be razed...
40 posted on 03/03/2004 12:37:33 AM PST by null and void (Pay no attention to the 1's and 0's behind the voting booth curtain, and they'll return the favor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-334 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson