Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Must Pass the Fair Tax Act
CNSNews.com ^ | February 27, 2004 | Mac Collins (R-GA)

Posted on 03/02/2004 10:23:45 PM PST by esarlls3

Congress Must Pass the Fair Tax Act
By U.S. Rep. Mac Collins
CNSNews.com Commentary
February 27, 2004

Past Congresses have moved in the wrong direction by making our tax laws more complex and expensive for business and individuals to comply with. To keep our economy growing, Congress needs to take action now.

My colleague, Georgia Republican Congressman John Linder, has sponsored the "Fair Tax Act" (H.R. 25), a national retail sales tax on new goods and services. It would replace all individual and corporate income taxes, payroll taxes as well as capital gains taxes, estate taxes and gift taxes.

The Fair Tax replaces the way we are currently taxed, which is based on our annual income, with a tax on goods and services. The Fair Tax, basically, is a voluntary "consumption" tax. The more you buy, the more you pay in taxes. The less you buy, the less you pay in taxes.

The federal government will continue to be fully funded, including Social Security and Medicare.

The Fair Tax will reduce the costs of goods and services by 20 to 30 percent. It will allow workers to keep 100 percent of their paycheck, pension and Social Security payments with the exception being state or local withholding

The Gross Domestic Product will increase by almost 10.5 percent in the first year after its enactment because real wages would increase and tax compliance costs for business would decrease by 90 percent.

The fair tax would also be good news for investors. Real investment will initially increase by 76 percent relative to investments that would be made under our present tax laws. While this increase will gradually decline, it remains 15 percent higher than under the existing tax structure.

American exports will increase by 26 percent initially and would remain more than 13 percent above present levels under the current tax system.

Studies of the Fair Tax have shown that many U.S. companies will choose expansion here in the United States versus abroad, and in turn the United States will become more attractive to many foreign owned companies looking for expansion possibilities.

President Bush, during his State of the Union address in January, said the economy is turning around because the American people are using their money far better than government would have. The Republican majority in Congress was right to return it to the American people and not keep it in Washington.

A fresh and a fairer approach to a Federal tax system is needed. Therefore, it is time for Congress to pass the Fair Tax (H.R. 25).

As a cosponsor of the Fair Tax Act, I have asked Chairman Thomas of the Ways and Means Committee to hold hearings on this vital legislation. I am hoping those hearings will get under way in the near future.

(Congressman Mac Collins is a Republican representing Georgia's 8th Congressional District. He serves on the House Ways and Means Committee and the House Select Committee on Intelligence.)


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: axixofevil; fairtax; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-334 next last

1 posted on 03/02/2004 10:23:45 PM PST by esarlls3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Taxreform; ancient_geezer; Taxman; Principled; Bigun
FairTax Bump
2 posted on 03/02/2004 10:25:07 PM PST by esarlls3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esarlls3
We should also make it clear that its a retail sales tax and not a dreaded VAT tax.
3 posted on 03/02/2004 10:26:45 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esarlls3
I'm for it but I know it will never pass. :-(
4 posted on 03/02/2004 10:26:50 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esarlls3
I'm for it but I know it will never pass. :-(
5 posted on 03/02/2004 10:27:08 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esarlls3
I'm for it but I know it will never pass. :-(
6 posted on 03/02/2004 10:27:11 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esarlls3
I'm for it but I know it will never pass. :-(
7 posted on 03/02/2004 10:27:13 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esarlls3
Interesting...

I, for one, like it. If the tax incentive of moving a business overseas disappears, maybe we can keep more jobs here. Of course, it's more complex than just taxes... But you have to start somewhere. Also, it may encourage more people to invest.

I would, but as a young person, really don't want a tax liability right now. If I pay all taxes up front, and eliminate the guesswoek, I would certainly be interested in investments beyond my simple savings account.

8 posted on 03/02/2004 10:28:39 PM PST by PurVirgo (If you give a lawyer viagra, he only grows taller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esarlls3; *Taxreform; Taxman; Principled; Bigun; EternalVigilance; kevkrom; n-tres-ted; Poohbah; ...
A Taxreform bump for you all.

If you would like to be added to this ping list let me know.

John Linder in the House & Saxby Chambliss Senate, offer a comprehensive bill to kill all income and payroll taxes outright, and provide a IRS free replacement in the form of a pure consumption tax:

H.R.25, S.1493
A bill to promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national retail sales tax to be administered primarily by the States.

Refer: http://www.fairtax.org & http://www.salestax.org

So that Sam Johnson's amendment to the constitution has a chance at enactment & ratification:

H.J.RES.61
Title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to abolish the Federal income tax.
Sponsor: Rep Johnson, Sam [TX-3] (introduced 6/24/2003)      Cosponsors: 5
Latest Major Action: 9/4/2003 Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution.


9 posted on 03/02/2004 10:30:15 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby
You can say that again!
10 posted on 03/02/2004 10:30:44 PM PST by null and void (Pay no attention to the ones and zeros behind the curtain, and they'll return the favor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

I'm for it but I know it will never pass. :-(

You give up too easily,

Last session the Fairtax had only 7 co-sponsors, and no sister bill in the Senate, This congressional session it has 43 Co-sponsors, and has been introduced in the Senate along with an ever growing list of both new Senate as well as House prospective candidates up and coming.

Congress Critter's In the News

(43) HR25 Co-Sponsors and

FairTax - Congressional Score Card

Primary races for Senate

Steve Rauschenberger (Illinois)

Herman Cain for United States Senate, state of Georgia 2004

House

Dennis Umphress, libertarian (California 16th District)

Dr. Paul DeWeese, (Michigan 7th District)

Vernon Robinson, (North Carolina's 5th District)

Ben Streusand, (Texas 10th District)

Michael McCaul, (Texas 10th District)

Dave Phillips, (Texas 10th District)

John Devine, (Texas 10th District)

Pat Elliot, (Texas 10th District)

Bill Lester (Texas 11th Congressional District)

And finding more every day.

11 posted on 03/02/2004 10:36:55 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Better check reply #11 above.

It ain't over till the fat lady sings my friend.
12 posted on 03/02/2004 10:38:11 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Perhaps. But it would take away congress' #1 social engineering (Ghod I hate that term) tool, punishing "bad" behavior with taxes, and rewarding "good" behavior with deductions, and "really good" behavior with credits.

Taxes would merely be a means of raising revenue, not muscling everyone around.

How would the cliton administration bought silence without the threat of punitive audits???
13 posted on 03/02/2004 10:45:00 PM PST by null and void (Pay no attention to the ones and zeros behind the curtain, and they'll return the favor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: esarlls3
What can I do to get the message out?
14 posted on 03/02/2004 10:45:04 PM PST by 31R1O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurVirgo

If the tax incentive of moving a business overseas disappears, maybe we can keep more jobs here.

Actually it is incentive to do more than just keep jobs here.

Consider,

Repealing all corporate income and payroll taxes as this bill does along with individual taxes, allows domestic prices to fall 20-25%. That increases our competitiveness in international markets tremendously.

At the same time, where imports now come into this country will little burden in taxes, they will for the first time be assessed the same taxes as our own domestic businesses are. That will create a substantive advantage for domestic business over the trade situtation we now deal with.

As a consequence:

Rep. Bill Archer, Chairman, House Ways and Means Committee:

Think about it.

15 posted on 03/02/2004 10:45:20 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: null and void
*nevermind* Arkancide. Duh!
16 posted on 03/02/2004 10:46:10 PM PST by null and void (Pay no attention to the ones and zeros behind the curtain, and they'll return the favor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: null and void

But it would take away congress' #1 social engineering

Who is congress dependant upon above all else. Try looking at yourself as a voter.

That is why the change will be, and is in the process of occuring. Your not alone in wanting to see and end to income and payroll taxes and HR25 offers an awful lot to everyone across the income spectrum. That is why it is starting to pick more steam as more people understand just what it would mean in their own lives.

Under the Fair tax, all legal residents will receive a Family Consumption Allowence(FCA) equivalent to the FairTax paid on essential goods and services. This provides for the essense of a personal exemption under the income tax, without excepting specific goods or services allowing everything to be taxed once but only once at the retail register and not require any income qualifications to provide an exemption. Everyone receives it right up to ole Bill Gates.

The FCA will be paid in advance, in equal installments each month. The size of the monthly FCA will be determined by the government's Poverty Level for a particular family size, multiplied by the tax rate.

Every year, the Department of Health and Human Services [HHS] determine the "poverty level" for each family size.

The 2001 "FairTax" Family Consumption Allowance Figures

Family Size

HHS Poverty Level

Annual FCA

Monthly FCA

One

$8,590

$1,976

$165

Two

$17,180

$3,951

$329

Three

$20,200

$4,646

$387

Four

$23,220

$5,341

$445

Five

$26,240

$6,035

$503

Six

$29,260

$6,730

$561

Seven

$32,280

$7,424

$619

Eight

$35,300

$8,119

$677

1) Federal Register: February 16, 2001, Pages 10695-10697).

[ The monthly FCA for each adult is .23 * (HSS poverty level for a single person)/12 to assure no marriage penalty due to the manner in which the poverty level is dependant on family size. The monthly FCA for each child is .23 * (the incremental increase of HSS poverty level for a family with one child over no child) ] A. Geezer

A family of four, for example, could spend $23,220 per year free of tax because they will have received over the course of the year rebates totaling $5,341. $5,341 is the amount of sales tax paid on $23,220 in expenditures. A family spending double the "poverty level" or $46,440 per year will effectively pay tax on only half of their spending and, therefore, have an effective tax rate of 11 ½ percent or half the FairTax rate.

The beauty of the FairTax is that you can control how much you pay in taxes. If you happen to save, invest or spend a portion on used [previously taxed] items, you can get your effective tax rate below 9%.

[71] To illustrate the plan's progressive nature we can examine the tax burden that a family of four will have at various annual income levels (or in this case, annual spending levels).

H.R.2525 "The FairTax Act

Not only does every family receive a FCA based on family size, not income, but they will also receive 100% of their paycheck:

Fedup Smith makes $39K per year...once the FairTax is the law of the land he will receive an instant increase in pay of $200.00 per week. Since he has a family of four, he will receive a FCA of $445 per month, for a total of $1,305.00 additional income per month that he can do with as he sees fit

17 posted on 03/02/2004 10:56:30 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 31R1O
imagine running into you here!
18 posted on 03/02/2004 10:58:36 PM PST by PurVirgo (If you give a lawyer viagra, he only grows taller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Try looking at yourself as a voter.

Oh, but I do. I've never missed an election in 32 years. I have yet to vote for anyone who won, though...

19 posted on 03/02/2004 11:00:13 PM PST by null and void (Pay no attention to the ones and zeros behind the curtain, and they'll return the favor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Taxes would merely be a means of raising revenue, not muscling everyone around.

Under the Constitution that is what they should be:

Article I Section 8: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises,
to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States;

It is up to us to see that we return to that standard. We do that by exercising our own muscle know as the vote, selecting those who will make the change over those who are not inclined to.

20 posted on 03/02/2004 11:00:49 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-334 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson