Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA: "A Chilling Possibility" Global Warming Could cause Deep Freeze!
NASA ^ | 3/5/04 | NASA

Posted on 03/05/2004 12:53:24 PM PST by Mark Felton

March 5, 2004:  Global warming could plunge North America and Western Europe into a deep freeze, possibly within only a few decades.

That's the paradoxical scenario gaining credibility among many climate scientists. The thawing of sea ice covering the Arctic could disturb or even halt large currents in the Atlantic Ocean. Without the vast heat that these ocean currents deliver--comparable to the power generation of a million nuclear power plants--Europe's average temperature would likely drop 5 to 10°C (9 to 18°F), and parts of eastern North America would be chilled somewhat less. Such a dip in temperature would be similar to global average temperatures toward the end of the last ice age roughly 20,000 years ago.

see captionRight: Retreating Arctic ice, 1979-2003, based on data collected by the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSMI). [More]

Some scientists believe this shift in ocean currents could come surprisingly soon--within as little as 20 years, according to Robert Gagosian, president and director of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Others doubt it will happen at all. Even so, the Pentagon is taking notice. Andrew Marshall, a veteran Defense Department planner, recently released an unclassified report detailing how a shift in ocean currents in the near future could compromise national security.

"It's difficult to predict what will happen," cautions Donald Cavalieri, a senior scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, "because the Arctic and North Atlantic are very complex systems with many interactions between the land, the sea, and the atmosphere. But the facts do suggest that the changes we're seeing in the Arctic could potentially affect currents that warm Western Europe, and that's gotten a lot of people concerned."

Ice is Key


Sign up for EXPRESS SCIENCE NEWS delivery
There are several satellites keeping an all-weather watch on ice cover in the Arctic. NASA's Aqua satellite, for instance, carries a Japanese-built sensor called the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-EOS ("AMSR-E" for short). Using microwaves, rather than visible light, AMSR-E can penetrate clouds and offer uninterrupted surveillance of the ice, even at night, explains Roy Spencer, the instrument's principal investigator at the Global Hydrology and Climate Center in Huntsville, Alabama. Other ice-watching satellites, operated by NASA, NOAA and the Dept. of Defense, use similar technology.

The view from orbit clearly shows a long-term decline in the "perennial" Arctic sea ice (the part that remains frozen during the warm summer months). According to a 2002 paper by Josefino Comiso, a climate scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, this year-round ice has been retreating since the beginning of the satellite record in 1978 at an average rate of 9% per decade. Studies looking at more recent data peg the rate at 14% per decade, suggesting that the decline of Arctic sea ice is accelerating.

see caption

Above: A global ocean circulation between deep, colder water and warmer, surface water strongly influences regional climates around the world. Image courtesy Argonne National Laboratory. [More]

Some scientists worry that melting Arctic sea ice will dump enough freshwater into the North Atlantic to interfere with sea currents. Some freshwater would come from the ice-melt itself, but the main contributor would be increased rain and snow in the region. Retreating ice cover exposes more of the ocean surface, allowing more moisture to evaporate into the atmosphere and leading to more precipitation.

Because saltwater is denser and heavier than freshwater, this "freshening" of the North Atlantic would make the surface layers more buoyant. That's a problem because the surface water needs to sink to drive a primary ocean circulation pattern known as the "Great Ocean Conveyor." Sunken water flows south along the ocean floor toward the equator, while warm surface waters from tropical latitudes flow north to replace the water that sank, thus keeping the Conveyor slowly chugging along. An increase in freshwater could prevent this sinking of North Atlantic surface waters, slowing or stopping this circulation.

see captionAMSR-E is collecting new data that will help scientists evaluate this possibility. For one thing, it provides greatly improved ground resolution over previous all-weather sensors. AMSR-E images reveal smaller cracks and fissures in the ice as it breaks up in the spring. This detail allows scientists to better understand the dynamics of ice break-up, says Cavalieri, a member of the AMSR-E team.

Right: Sea ice disintegrating off the coast of Greenland on March 15, 2003, as seen by the older Defense Meteorological Satellite Program SSMI sensor (14 km resolution) and the newer AMSR-E (~5 km resolution). Smaller cracks not visible in the left image show up clearly in the right one.

"Other important pieces of the puzzle, like rainfall, sea-surface temperatures, and oceanic winds, are also detected by AMSR-E. Looking at those variables together should help scientists assess the likelihood of a change in the Atlantic currents," adds Spencer.

Deja Vu?

Once considered incredible, the notion that climate can change rapidly is becoming respectable. In a 2003 report, Robert Gagosian cites "rapidly advancing evidence [from, e.g., tree rings and ice cores] that Earth's climate has shifted abruptly and dramatically in the past." For example, as the world warmed at the end of the last ice age about 13,000 years ago, melting ice sheets appear to have triggered a sudden halt in the Conveyor, throwing the world back into a 1,300 year period of ice-age-like conditions called the "Younger Dryas."

Will it happen again? Researchers are scrambling to find out.

see captionOn Feb. 13, an expedition set sail from Great Britain to place current-monitoring sensors in the Atlantic Ocean that will check the Gulf Stream for signs of slowing. The voyage is the latest step in a joint US / UK research project called Rapid Climate Change, which began in 2001. Another international project, called SEARCH (Study of Environmental Arctic CHange), kicked off in 2001 with the goal of more carefully assessing changes in Arctic sea ice thickness.

Above: The RRS Discovery, on a voyage to measure currents in the Atlantic Ocean. [More]

Much depends on how fast the warming of the Arctic occurs, according to computer simulations by Thomas F. Stocker and Andreas Schmittner of the University of Bern. In their models, a faster warming could shut down the major Atlantic current completely, while a slower warming might only slow the current for a few centuries.

And, inevitably, the discussion turns to people. Does human industry play a major role in warming the Arctic? Could we reverse the trend, if we wanted to? Not all scientists agree. Some argue that the changes occuring in the Arctic are consistent with large, slow natural cycles in ocean behavior that are known to science. Others see a greater human component.

"The sea ice thawing is consistent with the warming we've seen in the last century," notes Spencer, but "we don't know how much of that warming is a natural climate fluctuation and what portion is due to manmade greenhouse gases." If the Great Conveyor Belt suddenly stops, the cause might not matter. Europeans will have other things on their minds--like how to grow crops in snow. Now is the time to find out, while it's merely a chilling possibility.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; prozacchewables; whateverwesayitmeans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
oh, the irony...

(seriously, the earth is a closed-loop eco-system, perturbations are met with opposing force)

1 posted on 03/05/2004 12:53:25 PM PST by Mark Felton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
2 posted on 03/05/2004 12:55:51 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Every day we see articles here about the end of the world.

I'm sick of catastrophe. If it's going to happen, I say bring it on!
3 posted on 03/05/2004 12:56:25 PM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Obvioius, the thought of global warming was not winning enough support. People in Chicago for instance, embraced it with all their hearts. The global warming theory was failing, so they had to shift gear, hense we now have massive cooling.
4 posted on 03/05/2004 12:56:34 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
INTREP - Global Warming Scam
5 posted on 03/05/2004 12:56:39 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
too much rain causes desert conditions
6 posted on 03/05/2004 12:57:06 PM PST by InvisibleChurch (Remember, God made you special and He loves you very much!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
If Algore were elected in 2000 we wouldn't be reading this pap.
7 posted on 03/05/2004 12:57:11 PM PST by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Okay, I'm confused here... first the scientists tell us we are all going to freeze in another Ice Age (1970's), then they tell us "we are going to burn to cinders because of the greenhouse effect and the depleted ozone layer." Now, we a back to freezing again???

Please, scientists of the world, get together and come to some unified conclusion so we little ill-informed peons can make arrangements for when the sky falls.
8 posted on 03/05/2004 12:57:29 PM PST by yle1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
I just love the changing of the theory to fit the facts. Just wait until summer when it gets warmer (I know this will happen, it happens every year), then the scientists will change their mind and look at a warm weather model.
9 posted on 03/05/2004 12:58:24 PM PST by w1andsodidwe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
It's the end of the world as we know it.
10 posted on 03/05/2004 12:58:49 PM PST by Constitution Day (and I feel fine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
The Warmists really are covering all their bases. I just want to know one thing; If global warming can cause a deep freeze, how do we know that we aren't in an era of GLOBAL COOLING that has been causing the paradox of warm temperatures that have caused the global warming panic?
11 posted on 03/05/2004 12:59:15 PM PST by Jim_Curtis (If Benedict Arnold were alive today, Kerry would have had some real competition in the dem primaries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
... and I feel fine.
12 posted on 03/05/2004 12:59:27 PM PST by yle1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Well there you have it. If it gets warmer - global warming caused it. If it gets colder - global warming caused it.
13 posted on 03/05/2004 12:59:44 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
We're all gonna die!!!! (someday...)
14 posted on 03/05/2004 1:00:02 PM PST by Trampled by Lambs (...and pecked by the dove...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yle1138
Heh. See my tagline above.
15 posted on 03/05/2004 1:00:05 PM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
And I feel fine.
16 posted on 03/05/2004 1:00:34 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Hmmm... If this is so, then, on it's face, "Global Warming" doesn't seem to be too "global", is it?

Let's see -- according to the "logic" here (for lack of a better term), if it gets hotter, then that's proof of "global warming". And if it gets cooler, why, that too is proof of "global warming".

With those assertations in place, why bother seeking proof at all?

Probably because there is none...

17 posted on 03/05/2004 1:01:14 PM PST by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Even NASA wants in on the scam.

This proves once and for all that NASA has outlived its useful purpose.
18 posted on 03/05/2004 1:01:32 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Not all scientists agree. Some argue that the changes occuring in the Arctic are consistent with large, slow natural cycles in ocean behavior that are known to science. Others see a greater human component.
Well let's test the theory. Let's shut down all economic activity everywhere. Throw the planet's collective economy into a depression several orders of magnitude deeper than the depression of the 30s. Allow hundreds of millions of people to starve to death and allow a few of billion more to sink to abysmal poverty.

And then we'll see. If the artic ice continues to melt, we'll know it wasn't all our fault after all.

Why not? What have we got to lose.

In the name of Science!

19 posted on 03/05/2004 1:01:39 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
wait, you guys weren't there 10 seconds ago.
20 posted on 03/05/2004 1:01:42 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson