Skip to comments.
No Moon, no life on Earth, suggests theory
NewScientist.com ^
| 18 March, 2004
Posted on 03/20/2004 7:38:37 PM PST by Leroy S. Mort
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-240 next last
To: GeronL
"My GUANO detector is hitting the higher frequencies with this story. Pure BS"
Yeah to think that some people actually beleive in evolution. Where do they come up with these people.
21
posted on
03/20/2004 9:10:23 PM PST
by
Kerberos
To: orionblamblam; pepsionice
The current rate of recession is approximately 4 cm per year. Plus the sun is slowly expanding and the earth's rotation is slowing, causing the day to be longer. Remember the old adage, nothing last forever.
22
posted on
03/20/2004 9:12:38 PM PST
by
Lawgvr1955
(I am not completely worthless; I can always serve as a "bad example".)
To: Kerberos
I didn't say anything about evolution. I am referring to giving the moon credit for the start of life. THATS plain silly.
23
posted on
03/20/2004 9:18:58 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
To: socal_parrot
Actually, they were talking about Christopher Cross' musical careear. After all, without the moon, what else would you be stuck between with New York City. That is certainly a possibility.
If I'm not mistaken, it is believed that there used to be a river on the moon. It was wider than a mile.
24
posted on
03/20/2004 9:30:04 PM PST
by
Ken H
To: Lawgvr1955
"...nothing last forever. Forever lasts forever. ;^)
25
posted on
03/20/2004 9:30:51 PM PST
by
Auntie Dem
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
To: K1avg
now they argue that the moon is responsible for life? Maybe it was the Moon God
26
posted on
03/20/2004 9:33:26 PM PST
by
Auntie Dem
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
To: Auntie Dem
Below is the Mayan Moon God Tanah,
It is available for $150 from www.awrem.com.
27
posted on
03/20/2004 9:39:49 PM PST
by
socal_parrot
(It's not an argument, it's a contradiction!)
To: Leroy S. Mort
Even if there was water on Mars, life could not have evolved there And when they find just one small fossil found there?
28
posted on
03/20/2004 9:44:26 PM PST
by
ASA Vet
("Anyone who signed up after 11/28/97 is a newbie")
To: LiteKeeper
Information is never self-generated, nor can "matter" generate information.Why not?
How did the information about how to metabolize nylon arise? Analysis shows that the nylon-eating bugs are a single base pair mutation different from the wild (carbohydrate-eating) bugs.
Mutation occurs in nylon-free environment (eg before the '30s) : bacterium dies
Mutation occurs in nylon-rich environment : bacterium flourishes, reproduces. It's 'discovered' a new, totally-unoccupied, niche.
So where did the information come from? It seems to me it came from the environment to the genome. Self-geenerated by matter.
30
posted on
03/20/2004 9:57:52 PM PST
by
Consort
To: Virginia-American
To: GeronL
"I didn't say anything about evolution. I am referring to giving the moon credit for the start of life. THATS plain silly."
Not any sillier than creationism.
32
posted on
03/21/2004 8:58:46 AM PST
by
Kerberos
To: Auntie Dem
Forever lasts forever.Whoa!! Dude!! You're freakin' me out, man.
33
posted on
03/21/2004 10:13:25 AM PST
by
Lawgvr1955
(I am not completely worthless; I can always serve as a "bad example".)
To: PatrickHenry
Another abiogenesis theory (and the Luddites are in full screech mode).
To: *crevo_list; VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; LogicWings; ...
PING. [This ping list is for the evolution side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. FReepmail me to be added or dropped.]
35
posted on
03/21/2004 10:41:14 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Everything good that I have done, I have done at the command of my voices.)
To: Leroy S. Mort; PatrickHenry
re: A billion years later when life is thought to have arisen)))
You can't ever write these sorts of articles without heavy use of the passive voice combined with vague references to an ungraspable passage of time--
But you particularly need the passive voice to imply that such assumptions are sorta really kinda actually (Hans Vavink ) beyond question except for knuckle-dragging fundamentalists...
And somebody please write this guy a nice research grant...
Hey, Pat, did we ever get those new fruit flies?
36
posted on
03/21/2004 10:48:47 AM PST
by
Mamzelle
To: Leroy S. Mort
To: VadeRetro
The role of the moon has been discussed before:
Rare Earth.
38
posted on
03/21/2004 10:53:04 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Everything good that I have done, I have done at the command of my voices.)
To: PatrickHenry
Thanks for the ping!
To: GeronL; PatrickHenry; longshadow; ThinkPlease; edwin hubble; MikeD
My GUANO detector is hitting the higher frequencies with this story. Pure BSWell kinda. If you look at the Earth's tilt in reference to the ecliptic plane, the Moon seems to have played a large part in keeping it stable. This of course causes the seasons we have. Without the Moon, life may be far different that what we have today.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-240 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson