Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney's attack signals higher campaign profile
Financial Times ^ | 3-20-04 | Deborah McGregor

Posted on 03/20/2004 9:32:15 PM PST by Indy Pendance

When Dick Cheney launched a stinging personal attack on John Kerry's presidential credentials this week, it signalled a prominent new role for the vice-president in this year's elections.

But the strategy also offered Democrats a fresh target and underscored the polarising effect Mr Cheney can have on the campaign trail as he tries to ensure the re-election of President George W. Bush.

While beloved by Republican conservatives, Mr Cheney has seen his popularity fall steadily over the past year and he has been dogged by controversy generated by his business ties.

A University of Pennsylvania survey this week placed his favourable rating at just 35 per cent - down from 60 per cent a year ago.

Mr Cheney's blunt, serious demeanour and unswerving conservative views have endeared him to the base of the Republican party. And his willingness to go for Mr Kerry's jugular is likely to motivate the base even more at a time when the party is eager to energise its most loyal supporters.

The attack on Mr Kerry was just the beginning of what is expected to be a sustained assault on the Democrat's credibility by Mr Cheney and other leading Republicans.

"The senator from Massachusetts has given us ample doubts about his judgment and the attitude he brings to bear on vital issues of national security," said Mr Cheney in a speech in California on Wednesday.

It is not unusual for vice-presidents to swing into attack mode in an election year. Most of Mr Cheney's predecessors have played similar roles. But Mr Cheney, dogged by his own controversies, may have the potential to mobilise Democrats and independent voters against him almost as forcefully as energising Republicans for Mr Bush.

"Dick Cheney's campaigning is a plus for reaching the Republican base but a minus in terms of reaching swing voters," says John Kessel, a political scientist at Ohio State University.

The fact that Republican strategists have opted to roll out their big "attack" guns - Mr Bush and Mr Cheney - so early in the campaign, Mr Kessel says, may indicate that internal Republican polling suggests the Bush-Cheney ticket is in a weak re-election position, leaving little choice but to pull out all the stops now.

Republicans obviously do not see it that way. "Vice-president Cheney is an incredible asset to the re-election effort. He is wildly popular with our grassroots activists and you can expect him to continue to be a very forceful advocate for President Bush and this administration's record," says Scott Stanzel, a spokesman for the Bush-Cheney campaign.

But Democrats are convinced Mr Cheney's more prominent role will work to their advantage.

"Dick Cheney is a very divisive figure. We say, go right ahead. Let's see lots of Dick Cheney on the campaign trail," says Cara Morris of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

Republican strategists, in part, are hoping that Mr Cheney's aggressive new role will halt, once and for all, the speculation that Mr Bush might seek another running mate. At this late stage, it is unlikely Mr Cheney would be replaced.

Still, Mr Cheney continues to operate under a cloud of unwelcome attention. This week it emerged that the Pentagon is withholding $300m (€242m, £163m) in payments to Halliburton, the oil-services company he once led, for possible overcharging for meals served to US troops in Iraq and Kuwait.

And there are lingering questions about Mr Cheney's friendship with Antonin Scalia, the Supreme Court justice who refused to recuse himself from a case seeking to force the White House to release documents related to Mr Cheney's energy task force.

None of it is likely to deter the former congressman from Wyoming, whose low profile has given way to a visible - and vocal - new presence in the campaign.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushcheney2004; cheney; gwb2004; vp

1 posted on 03/20/2004 9:32:17 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
He went like a red hot buzzsaw through butter in that speech - let's have more like it!
2 posted on 03/20/2004 9:42:36 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right, never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken
Yep, as long as Cheney is in the public eye he is the wise man and father figure. When he is in the background he gets to be hysterically defined by the enemy.

3 posted on 03/20/2004 10:01:08 PM PST by Jim_Curtis (Free Milosevic.....Jail Annan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
I LOVE CHENEY...and that was a biased article.Cheney does what he does so well!
4 posted on 03/20/2004 10:12:43 PM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"Dick Cheney launched a stinging personal attack on John Kerry"
Stinging? PERSONAL?! what was personal about his attack? His "attack" was totally issue based.
5 posted on 03/20/2004 10:17:25 PM PST by Betaille ("I voted for the 87 billion dollars before I voted against it." -John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"The fact that Republican strategists have opted to roll out their big "attack" guns - Mr Bush and Mr Cheney - so early in the campaign, Mr Kessel says, may indicate that internal Republican polling suggests the Bush-Cheney ticket is in a weak re-election position"
There are so many untruths in this paragraph I wouldn't even know where to begin, so I will just say this... Has this guy seen the recent polls from liberal sources like the NYtimes and MSNBC showing Bush ahead significantly?
6 posted on 03/20/2004 10:20:01 PM PST by Betaille ("I voted for the 87 billion dollars before I voted against it." -John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Betaille
Exactly, and you've been commenting on a couple articles I've posted from the NY Times. For them, they are scathing reports against Kerry.
7 posted on 03/20/2004 10:23:52 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Cheney was great in that speech out at the Reagan Library. He could still ratchet up a notch or two, and really fire up the base.
8 posted on 03/20/2004 10:39:06 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Betaille
exactly, this sentence contradicts itself - "When Dick Cheney launched a stinging personal attack on John Kerry's presidential credentials this week, ...." one presidential credentials ain't exactly personal. Personal is more like saying "John Kerry is a Jerk because the treats people very badly" - which by the way is also true!!
9 posted on 03/20/2004 10:39:50 PM PST by Murtyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson