Homosexual Public Restroom Sex Defended In California (Hey, They Were Born That Way!)

Traditional Values Coalition ^ | March 20, 2004 | TVC

[pinochet]

Homosexual Public Restroom Sex Defended In California

Summary: A lawyer defending the "right" of homosexuals to engage in sex in public restroom stalls was on "The O'Reilly Factor" on March 16, 2004.

"The O'Reilly Factor" recently featured a heated discussion between Bill O'Reilly and criminal defense attorney Bruce Nickerson over the alleged "right" of homosexuals to engage in sodomy in public restroom stalls in California.

Police in Fresno, California, recently arrested 40 homosexuals on lewd and lascivious behavior for having public sex in a park. The sting operation was called "Protecting Our Children." Some of the men were found within yards of playgrounds.

Fresno County Superior Court Judge James Quashnick has sided with the defense attorneys who claim that the prosecution of homosexuals is discriminatory because no heterosexuals were arrested for public sex during this sting operation.

Bruce Nickerson claimed on O'Reilly that in California, a public restroom is considered a private area and it is not illegal to engage in sodomy in the stalls. In fact, Nickerson asserted that if a parent or child were to peek into the stalls, "…you've violated their privacy" to engage in sodomy.

According to Nickerson, it's perfectly all right for homosexuals to sodomize each other in public parks "…where you reasonably don't expect to offend anybody."

The effort by homosexuals to have public sex legalized is not new. In fact, in 2001, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, headed by Margaret Marshall, issued an edict stating that public sex is legal as long as it's discreetly done.

Marshall's ruling came as a result of a lawsuit filed by the Gay and Lesbian Advocates & Defenders on behalf of a homosexual arrested at a rest area for lewd conduct.

In 2000, the British homosexual group OutRage demanded that the British Parliament legalize homosexual sex in public, including public toilets and cruising areas. The government was considering changing public sex laws to make it illegal to engage in public sex only if the sex acts would "alarm or distress or give offense" to others.

[pinochet]

{sarcasm} Why can't the right-wing bigots realize that homosexuals are born with the orientation to have sex in restrooms and public parks, and should not be blamed for their behavior? Don't they realize that homosexuals cannot control themselves sexually, because they were born that way?

Gays, you see, are like epileptics. Just like an epileptic has no control over his physical convulsions, the homosexual has no control over his craving to have sex with another man's rectum in public parks and resrooms.

Can't all of you homophobic, racist, sexist and facist right-wingers, give the poor, persecuted homos a break, when they decide to indulge in their favorite recreational sport in public parks?

After all, no one bothers you, when you play with a frisbee with your kids and your dog in the public park. Throwing the frisbee is your sport of choice. Let the homos too, engage in their favorite sport as well, that of rectum plunging. {end of sarcarsm}

[goldstategop]

Heterosexuals have sex in airplane lavatories too and its illegal. Some people will get a kick out of joining the rarerified High Mile Club!

[Unam Sanctam]

This kind of public indecency is an infringement on the rights of the public to use a restroom for its intended purpose without having to view or listen to goings on that should be taking place in a private room away from the public eye. There is absolutely no defense for this kind of public indecency, and the liberals have no right to inflict it upon us.

[Unam Sanctam]

In fact, in 2001, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, headed by Margaret Marshall, issued an edict stating that public sex is legal as long as it's discreetly done.

This woman has a lot to answer for. She is a prime culprit in making Massachusetts a moral sewer.

[Fitzcarraldo]

The slippery slope gets even more slippery.

[Dan from Michigan]

Get a f'ing room!

It's that too much to ask?

[Dan from Michigan]

Not it's. IS.

[goldstategop]

You should see what people do in nightclub bathroom stalls together. Don't get me wrong, sex in public is indecent but some people find the danger of discovery to be highly arousing.

[goldstategop]

Its all about sex, my friends. Nothing you haven't seen on the cable TV channels and besides, as every one knows, its time to move on.

[Unam Sanctam]

One has a choice whether to turn on a TV. One doesn't have a choice when one needs to use a public toilet.

[joesnuffy]

Given the chronic infections of STDs among sodomites...their engaging in (what it is they do) in public places, is an act of bio terrorism...

[vikingchick]

Beware of all rest stops down I-5. Especially you guys.

[Vigilanteman]

Fresno County Superior Court Judge James Quashnick has sided with the defense attorneys who claim that the prosecution of homosexuals is discriminatory because no heterosexuals were arrested for public sex during this sting operation.

Is this judge a moron, or what? Generally, even the sleeziest of hetrosexuals will find a cheap rent-by-the-hour room to do their thing. Is it too much to ask that homos do the same.

[Vigilanteman]

Fresno County Superior Court Judge James Quashnick has sided with the defense attorneys who claim that the prosecution of homosexuals is discriminatory because no heterosexuals were arrested for public sex during this sting operation.

Is this judge a moron, or what? Generally, even the sleeziest of hetrosexuals will find a cheap rent-by-the-hour room to do their thing. Is it too much to ask that homos do the same.

[expatpat]

No privacy rights apply to this behavior, hetero- or homo-.

[microgood]

Is this judge a moron, or what?

He is no doubt a homosexual and does this sick stuff himself.

[Hillary's Lovely Legs]

There are websites dedicated to where to have public sex, especially in restrooms. It's for the discriminating traveler or local public sex aficionado.

[expatpat]

Sure, but if they get caught, they've no basis to complain that it's legal!

[goldstategop]

Don't be shocked but in the "red light" districts in Europe in the adult nightclubs, you can actually view people having sex on the stage in front of your eyes.

[torchthemummy]

So let me understand - gays are saying they should be able to marry because otherwise it is an equal protection violation. At the same time, they present the argument that marriage in their eyes is a union of either a man and woman, man and man, or woman and woman (we won't address gay polygamy at this juncture) and that there is no difference as long as the "couple" love each other.

Then in this article, they state not only the ridiculous theory that sex in an open, public space is not only ok but an obvious choice...for gays. Nothing about heterosexuals or their "equal rights." At the same time, this kind of gay activity is primarily between 2 strangers, ie., not an "item" or couple, which supports the fact that gay men, primarily involved in this situation, are very prone to go from partner to partner without ever finding "true love."

The bottomline (my apologies to Orwell): All sexual activities are equal but some sexual activities are more equal than others.