Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Democrats Threaten to Block More Bush Nominees
NY Times ^ | March 26, 2004 | DAVID STOUT

Posted on 03/26/2004 4:39:17 PM PST by neverdem

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"/>

The New York Times


March 26, 2004

Senate Democrats Threaten to Block More Bush Nominees

By DAVID STOUT

WASHINGTON, March 26 — Senate Democrats threatened today to block all of President Bush's judicial nominations unless the White House promised not to name any more judges while Congress was away.

"These actions not only poison the nomination process," the minority leader, Senator Tom Daschle, Democrat of South Dakota, said. "They strike at the principle of checks and balances that is one of pillars of American democracy."

Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, called Mr. Bush's use of recess appointments "a finger in the eye of the Constitution."

Five weeks ago, President Bush used a Congressional recess to install William H. Pryor Jr., the Alabama attorney general, in a federal appeals court seat to get around a Democratic filibuster that had blocked his nomination.

Mr. Pryor will be able to serve on the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, based in Atlanta, until the end of the next session of Congress — meaning sometime in the fall of 2005.

The Pryor appointment was the second time this year that Mr. Bush used a president's power to make appointments when Congress is not in session to name judges directly to the bench and thus skirt the Senate confirmation process.

In January, Mr. Bush named Charles W. Pickering Sr., whose nomination had also been blocked by Senate Democrats, to a seat for the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, based in New Orleans. He, too, will have to step down before many months, unless there is a huge shift in the Senate and he is able to win confirmation.

"We will be clear," Senator Daschle said today. "We will continue to cooperate in the confirmation of federal judges, but only if the White House gives the assurance that it will no longer abuse the process and that it will once again respect our Constitution's essential system of checks and balances."

President Bush and his chief spokesman, Scott McClellan, were in the Southwest today and thus not ready to respond immediately to the Democrats' move.

Senator Bill Frist, Republican of Tennessee, the majority leader, called the tactic "posturing" and told reporters no administration would rule out recess appointments.

Senate Democrats have blocked several of Mr. Bush's nominations on grounds that his choices are out of the judicial mainstream and have shown an insensitivity to civil rights. Mr. Bush has said the Democrats are playing politics and in so doing thwarting honest, highly qualified people.


Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: daschle; dems; federaljudges; judicialnominees; obstrictionists; senatedemocrats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: neverdem
They better expel all their windbag threatenings now because after November I don't think they're going to have much pull in that Senate.
61 posted on 03/27/2004 2:41:19 PM PST by GretchenEE (May the Lord give our enemies into our hands, quickly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care
"The administration needs to tie together liberal judges appointed by Democrats, with gay marriage and the pledge case."

you could add trying to delay the recall election, changing election law in FL and NJ, changing tax law in NV and I'm sure Freepers could come up with more. But your two have the best play to the masses.

62 posted on 03/27/2004 3:01:59 PM PST by votelife (Elect a Filibuster Proof Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Senate Democrats threatened today to block all of President Bush's judicial nominations unless the White House promised not to name any more judges while Congress was away. "These actions not only poison the nomination process," the minority leader, Senator Tom Daschle, Democrat of South Dakota, said. "They strike at the principle of checks and balances that is one of pillars of American democracy."

Where were your bellyaches for Bill Lan Lee, Daschle? Why not do the votes as Constitutionally required, Daschle.

I hope this is your last term in the Senate, squirt.

63 posted on 03/27/2004 6:28:23 PM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SCHROLL
Good idea.

It'll be a great campaign issue in Sd, Ark, and all 5 open Southern Seats.
64 posted on 03/28/2004 12:20:11 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Good grief people, read up.

If this were possible, we would have done it a long time ago. Frist has already signed on to legislation that would end the filibuster, but it's not gonna do any good. Why?

THEY WILL JUST FILIBUSTER THAT TOO!!!

Look, I'm as upset as you about all this, but blaming the R's isn't productive.
65 posted on 03/28/2004 12:26:46 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: gatorgriz
I sense you're a little timid in expressing your true sentiments about the good Senator. Please, tell us your true feelings.

P.S. You're far from the only one having this opinion!!!

66 posted on 03/28/2004 12:35:28 PM PST by Paulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
So the dems are threatening ---- to do what they have been doing for the past 3 years?

I'm shakin in my shoes. Oooooh. I'm "very concerned".
67 posted on 03/28/2004 3:06:36 PM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zbigreddogz
It will be hard to obtain votes for Republican candidates in regard to the filibuster of judges in AR or SD. Most voters really do not understand the filibuster, the Constitution, or Senate procedures. Voters also rarely vote on a single issue, and when they do, their numbers are small. So even if a Dakotan opposes Daschle's position on blocking conservative judges, he may still support Daschle because Daschle has high name ID and puts SD on the map, may even get a little "federal gravy" for the Dakotans. As for AR, there is no serious Republican senatorial candidate even running in that heavily Democrat state.
68 posted on 03/28/2004 7:40:06 PM PST by Theodore R. (When will they ever learn?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson