Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nasa plane to try Mach 7 flight
bbc ^ | Saturday, 27 March, 2004

Posted on 03/27/2004 10:56:22 AM PST by demlosers

The US space agency will attempt to fly its experimental hypersonic research aircraft, the X-43A, this Saturday.

The unpiloted 3.7m-long vehicle uses a scramjet to reach a design speed in excess of Mach 7, more than 8,000 km/h (5,000 mph).

Scramjets burn hydrogen but take their oxygen from the air which is forced into the engine at very high speed.

It is hoped this technology could one day dramatically reduce the length of long-haul passenger flights and make it much cheaper to launch space payloads.

Nasa will just want its latest experiment to complete its goals without incident. The first attempt to fly an X-43A ended in the destruction of the vehicle when its launch system failed. The new flight will take place over a naval range in the Pacific Ocean, off the coast of southern California, at 2000 GMT.

A scramjet operates by the supersonic combustion of fuel in a stream of air compressed by the high forward speed of the aircraft, as opposed to a normal jet engine, in which fan blades compress the air.

But scramjets only start to work at about Mach 6, or six times the speed of sound. And this means they first have to be boosted to their operational velocity.

In the case of the X-43A, this will be done by a modified Pegasus rocket, which will be released from under the wing of a B-52 bomber.

If all goes well, the 1,300kg wedge-shaped research craft will separate from its booster and accelerate away with the power from its scramjet.

The engine should operate for just 10 seconds. The X-43A will then glide through the atmosphere conducting a series of aerodynamic manoeuvres for up to six minutes on its way to splashdown.

If successful, the test will mark the first time a non-rocket, air-breathing scramjet engine has powered a vehicle in flight at hypersonic speeds.

Engineering challenge

Scramjet technology was first proposed in the 1950s and 60s. Because they take their oxidant from the atmosphere, the weight of any aircraft is therefore substantially reduced.

Those weight savings could be used to increase payload capacity, increase range or reduce vehicle size for the same payload.

TOP SPEEDS

Concorde: 1350mph (2173km/h)
Japan's bullet train: Record: 277mph (446km/h);
scheduled service: 186mph (300km/h)
French TGV: World record (1990): 515.3km/h (320.3mph);
scheduled service: 259.4km/h (161.1mph)

The scramjet attraction is obvious. If the many engineering challenges can be overcome, this propulsion technology could make it possible to fly, for example, from London to Sydney in just a couple of hours.

More likely in the first instance, they will find applications in the space delivery business - launching small payloads, such as communications satellites, into orbit.

The first ever free flight of a scramjet was conducted by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) in 2001. Its engine was fired from a gun in an enclosed facility on the ground.

A year later, University of Queensland researchers flew their HyShot scramjet on a missile.



TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mach7; nasa; space; x43a
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 03/27/2004 10:56:23 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: demlosers
NASA TV Online (RealAudio Media)

Take off: 12:00 p.m. PST

X-43A launch: 1:00 p.m. PST

More here.

2 posted on 03/27/2004 11:05:37 AM PST by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
It is hoped this technology could one day dramatically reduce the length of long-haul passenger flights ...
Ahhh... I'm not in that much of a hurry.... Gimme a ticket for an aeroplane... The old-fashioned kind.
3 posted on 03/27/2004 11:08:25 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
It is hoped this technology could one day dramatically reduce the length of long-haul passenger flights and make it much cheaper to launch space payloads.

Holy Cow!!! Who in their right mind would volunteer to be a passenger on anything that goes Mach 7?!!!

4 posted on 03/27/2004 11:16:00 AM PST by BykrBayb (FReepers make algore regret inventing the Internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers; Tijeras_Slim; FireTrack; Pukin Dog; citabria; B Knotts; kilowhskey; cyphergirl; ...

5 posted on 03/27/2004 11:17:25 AM PST by Aeronaut (John Kerry's mother always told him that if you can't say anything nice, run for president. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Click the 'BUMP' Graphic to Access ALL FR Bump Lists

6 posted on 03/27/2004 11:17:32 AM PST by Fiddlstix (This Space Available for Rent or Lease by the Day, Week, or Month. Reasonable Rates. Inquire within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
Well, at least if anything happend, youd bed dead in a tenth of a second.
7 posted on 03/27/2004 11:19:17 AM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
But I want time to call 911, so I can have my last words (and screams) recorded for playback on the evening news.
8 posted on 03/27/2004 11:21:10 AM PST by BykrBayb (FReepers make algore regret inventing the Internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: demlosers

If that brown thing on the bottom is the ENGINE, it appears that there will be quite an offset to the thrust vector, creating a 'pitch-up' condition...

10 posted on 03/27/2004 11:44:22 AM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Ahhh... I'm not in that much of a hurry.... Gimme a ticket for an aeroplane... The old-fashioned kind.

Not susceptible to blood clots? (-;

I remember a Cessna owner saying how depressing it is, to be following a highway, then hit a strong headwind, and have the cars below "pass" you by.

11 posted on 03/27/2004 11:50:45 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer
Thought you might be interested in this.
12 posted on 03/27/2004 11:53:15 AM PST by ecurbh (In 84 days ecurbh will marry HairOfTheDog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke
Maybe propellors are a bit too old-fashioned. But I'm quite satisfied with the average run-of-the-mill jet airliners of today.

What's NASA doing here, anyway? Are they off on a thousand different projects at the same time? Just how big a budget do they think they have? (Newsflash: not that big.)

Is this really something they should be squandering funds on? I have my doubts.

Let the airline passengers fend for themselves, NASA. Keep your eye on the planets. And the moon.
13 posted on 03/27/2004 11:53:47 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
What's NASA doing here, anyway?

Attempting to find a cheaper way to achieve orbit? Not having to carry as much oxidizer is a plus.

I'd have to spend some time thinking about the cost/benefit/application of a intermediate stage-only
scramjet in launches. Or maybe it would only be used for launches from an airborne platform?

Maybe it's funded from the DoD?

14 posted on 03/27/2004 12:04:52 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Is this really something they should be squandering funds on? I have my doubts.

Let the airline passengers fend for themselves, NASA. Keep your eye on the planets. And the moon.

If you would have read this article, or in fact ANY article on scramjet technology, you would know that this is the future of getting things into leo, cheaply and easily.

15 posted on 03/27/2004 12:08:19 PM PST by TomB (I voted for Kerry before I voted against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke
I thought about that, too. There's long been talk about a "space plane". I guess this is a step towards that. Which would make sense. And anything that boosts the military is good for all of us. But I would prefer they not do it in the name of faster passenger service. Not the same year that I just watched the Concord behind towed up the Hudson river to its final resting place. We don't need faster passenger travel. We do need cheaper space flight. And we always need a stronger military.
16 posted on 03/27/2004 12:08:42 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All
For anyone watching Nasa-TV and got tired of the interminable checklists, the -52 is taking off now.
17 posted on 03/27/2004 12:14:53 PM PST by TomB (I voted for Kerry before I voted against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
Holy Cow!!! Who in their right mind would volunteer to be a passenger on anything that goes Mach 7?!!!

Me! Oh wait, you said in their right mind. *nevermind*

18 posted on 03/27/2004 12:21:11 PM PST by null and void (Don't stand idly by and watch your country commit Hairy Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
How did the test go?
19 posted on 03/27/2004 12:24:27 PM PST by jpsb (Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
How did the test go?

It won't be going off for another hour or two.

The damn launch plane isn't even off the ground yet.

(They must be taxiing to the test area)

20 posted on 03/27/2004 12:26:13 PM PST by TomB (I voted for Kerry before I voted against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson