AN ALTERNATIVE HISTORY:

TNR ^ | April 9, 2004 | Greg Easterbrook

[TheHouseWife]

i wish this article could be produced and televised for the whole world to see. What a strong message this sends. It would cause 'foot in mouth' syndrome all over.
Great Message!

[Ukiapah Heep]

Is this the same guy with the Jew hating blog?

[TheHouseWife]

Yeah, i think so, i think he is the one that got in a bunch of trouble for calling the people at Disney a bunch of Jews.

[Salman]

bump

[lilylangtree]

Yet, Clintoon was kept in office after he perjured himself repeatedly and dereliction of duty. The blame for 911 falls squarely on Clintoon's shoulders with Hitlery sharing.

[Chi-townChief]

Didn't Ann Coulter do something similar to this a year or so ago?

[Dales]

This would make a really good ad coming from a 527

[wardaddy]

I'm suprised at the source....my fav 25 years ago when I was a fool.

[Bonaventure]

This makes an obvious point to devastating effect.

[lainde]

Love it. It's the ultimate answer to the whiners that bellow about why didn't we act sooner. Of course they're the same ones who hate the Patriot Act and the preemption doctrine.

[P.O.E.]

Especially in light of the "racial profiling" news that was all the rage back then. I remember that very morning, a local radio show was reporting about two black women arrested at an airport (LAX, I think), because they had identical green suitcases, one of which authorities had a tip contained a lot of drugs. The one who was wrongly detained was raising a racial profiling ruckus.

In the middle of that news report, they cut away to coverage of the trade center.

[Sir Gawain]

Weird similar article, "In a Parallel Universe Called 'What If'":

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1114919/posts

[expatguy]

bttt

[TLOne]

Just great! It's amazing how the brilliant people on the left can support pre-emptive war in hindsight.

If they thought about their positions then they would become more conservative or their brains would explode.
Therefore they do not think.

[Dataman]

That is really, really good.

Only trouble is, libs will say the same thing.

[samtheman]

This piece should be FReeped nationwide.

I just sent this out on my rather large mailing list.

[EveningStar]

bttt

[Alas Babylon!]

If the same standards suggested in this article had applied in 1941, Prime Minister Churchill and President Roosevelt would both have been removed from office for their "folly and criminality" in opposing the Nazi government of Hitler's Germany.

Not Churchill. Lest we forget, England fought Hitler from September of 1939, going alone against him from May of 1940 through late June of 1941, and we only joined the fight at the very end of 1941.

[Darth Reagan]

This is good, read the alternative history.