Posted on 4/16/2004, 1:52:25 AM by phil_will1
As you struggle to prepare your taxes this year, you may take some comfort in knowing that your headache is being felt across the country. The following odd and outrageous facts show how widespread income tax problems are:
The U.S. "tax army" is bigger than the U.S. army in Iraq. Income taxes are so complex that there are up to 1.2 million paid tax preparers in the country -- six times more than the number of troops in Iraq. The tax army includes legions of accountants, lawyers, and computer experts -- some of the best minds in the country. Unfortunately, their brainpower is adding little to the nation's standard of living.
A tax form for every special interest. As the income tax grows more complex, the number of IRS tax forms has jumped from 402 in 1990 to 526 by 2002. Congress hands the accountants business on a silver platter when they create special interest tax forms such as "8845-Indian Employment Credit" and "8834-Qualified Electric Vehicle Credit." When Congress penalizes an activity, we get tax forms such as "6197-Gas Guzzler Tax." It's time to end the micromanaging and adopt a simple flat-rate tax. Until then, Congress needs to supplement "6478-Credit for Alcohol Used as Fuel" with form "XXX-Credit for Alcohol Used for Drinking."
Double-tax on dividends: 60 years and still not fixed. Sixty years ago, a Treasury report noted that "double taxation of corporate profits is the principal problem raised in connection with the corporation income tax." In the 1930s, a Treasury report argued that the tax disincentive to pay dividends caused corporate management problems. Recent scandals proved them right. Congress should bite the bullet and reform dividend taxes now -- before the next round of corporate scandals begins.
Congress promotes discrimination through the tax code. The front of the Supreme Court building boldly declares "equal justice under law," yet the income tax has hundreds of discriminatory provisions. For example, homeowners are treated more favorably than renters since they can deduct mortgage interest and other itemized deductions. Consider that a higher-income homeowner can effectively deduct car loan interest by shifting around his finances but a lower-income apartment dweller cannot. Americans would not stand for such discrimination on other taxes -- imagine if each shopper at Wal-Mart was assigned a different sales tax rate!
Congress on tax complexity: Who us? Congress frequently holds hearings on tax simplification so members can denounce the tax code's complexity. Each time, congressional experts and outside think tanks provide useful simplification ideas. Then when the TV cameras are turned off, Congress promptly ignores them and votes for more special interest breaks. The result: The number of pages in the tax code and regulations doubled from 26,300 in 1984 to 54,846 by 2003, according to tax publisher CCH.
AMT designed to catch 155 taxpayers will soon catch 37 million. The alternative minimum tax is an unneeded parallel tax system alongside the ordinary income tax. It began life in 1969 after Congress was shocked (shocked!) to learn that 155 wealthy individuals were not paying tax because they used too many of the deductions that Congress had provided them. The AMT has been a complex nuisance ever since. But this dumb idea aimed at the rich is set to explode on the middle-class as the number of AMT taxpayers skyrockets from 3 million today to 36 million by 2010.
Voluntarism works for the U.S. military, not the income tax. For years, officials have hailed the income tax as a voluntary system. The Treasury calls it "our voluntary tax system." The IRS says that it pursues "enforcement programs to promote voluntary compliance" and establishes "strategies to maximize voluntary tax law compliance by emphasizing customer satisfaction." But with 32 million IRS penalties assessed each year and about $10,000 in income taxes imposed on each taxpaying household, the tax isn't voluntary and these customers aren't satisfied.
Congress can't figure out how to measure "income." Although the income tax is 90 years old, Congress still can't figure out how to measure "income." Some income such as municipal bond interest is not taxed, but other income such as dividends is taxed twice. The income tax treatment of savings is particularly incoherent and unstable. For example, there have been 25 major changes in the capital gains tax since 1922. The solution is to replace the income tax with a low-rate tax that exempts savings.
Family saving shouldn't require an advanced math degree. Shouldn't saving for education, retirement, and other items be as simple as putting money in the bank? Instead, Congress has manufactured hundreds of special savings rules, such as for 401(k)s, Keoghs, deductible IRAs, nondeductible IRAs, education IRAs, Roth IRAs, traditional pension plans, annuities, SIMPLEs, SEPs, MSAs, and others. The IRS guide to IRAs alone is 105 pages long! President Bush's initiative to consolidate the savings plans and create a universal IRA would be a good step to bring some sanity to this mess.
Income taxes: A bad idea that got worse. The income tax is not an example of a good idea gone bad. It was bad from the beginning, and it just keeps getting worse. The income tax distorts financial planning and business investment, and it encourages tax avoidance and evasion. Because the income tax is built on an unworkable base of "income," the law is continually changing. Let's simplify Americans' finances and disband the tax army by pursuing fundamental tax reform.
Source: CCH Inc. Number of pages in the CCH Standard Federal Tax Reporter, www.cch.com.
The second point is that this article by Cato does a good job of laying out a few of the problems with the current system (a thorough and exhaustive treatment would have been longer than War and Peace). However, their solution - the Flat Tax - is totally inadequate for the magnitude of the problem. It is the equivalent of treating a cancer patient with aspirin. These guys MUST be kidding.
Any Senator or Representative that made a mistake was to be immediately executed.
He guaranteed that the tax code would be simplified by next April 15th. Sounds like it would work to me.
Any Senator or Representative that made a mistake was to be immediately executed.
AT RANDOM!???
That's discrimination! What about affirmative action? How can all the minority groups be assured they are properly represented?
Obviously the fellow on the radio has not thought this thing all the way through!
/sarcasm>
"A hand from Washington will be stretched out and placed upon every man's business; the eye of the federal inspector will be in every man's counting house....The law will of necessity have inquisical features, it will provide penalties, it will create complicated machinery. Under it men will be hauled into courts distant from their homes. Heavy fines imposed by distant and unfamiliar tribunals will constantly menace the tax payer. An army of federal inspectors, spies, and detectives will descend upon the state."
-- Virginian House Speaker Richard E. Byrd, 1910, predicting the consequences of an income tax.
If you would like to be added to this ping list let me know.
- It is fairer to tax people on what they extract from the economy, as roughly measured by their consumption, than to tax them on what they produce for the economy, as roughly measured by their income.
[Montesquieu wrote in Spirit of the Laws, XIII,c.14:]
- "A capitation is more natural to slavery; a duty on merchandise is more natural to liberty, by reason it has not so direct a relation to the person."
-- a free people that pays slave taxes to its government is willingly training itself for bondage.
Alan Keyes 1999
Actaully, this is the seed of a really good idea. Get your congressman and Senators on record. Do they figure their own taxes, yes or no?
Any Senator or Representative that made a mistake was to be immediately executed.
I vote we use a guillotine :O)
Well what do you suggest, a "national sales tax" or VAT or "consumption tax'? I think these would be regressive.
Try the NRST, H.R.25 "The FairTax Act
All legal residents will receive a FCA equivalent to the FairTax paid on essential goods and services The FCA will be paid in advance, in equal installments each month. The size of the monthly FCA will be determined by the government's PovertyLevel for a particular family size, multiplied by the tax rate.
In otherwords every legal resident will receive the same amount regardless of income level in place of personal exemptions of the income/payroll tax system the NRST replaces.
The beauty of the FairTax is that you can control how much you pay in taxes. If you happen to save, invest or spend a portion on used [previously taxed] items, you can get your effective tax rate below 9%.
To illustrate the plan's progressive nature we can examine the tax burden that a family of four will have at various annual spending levels (as opposed to , annual income levels of the income tax).
I get the same "benefit" from government as Gates and the street bum. Why should any of us pay more than the other?
That system is not only fair, but it would immediately put a halt to the designs of our voracious, free-spending (Republican, if I need to remind anyone) Congress and our Prescription Drug Welfare, vetoless (Republican) President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.