[Quix]

Given God's demonstrated miraculous affirmations of Paul's life after his conversion . . .

and, as former very hostile atheist Josh McDowell's scholarly assertions that there's better proof than a lot of courts convict murders to death on . . .

I have no trouble accepting Paul's assertions. They were, by the way, quite reasonably close to the events. Perhaps you forget he held Stephen's coat at Stephen's stoning.

[Dave S]

Perhaps you forget he held Stephen's coat at Stephen's stoning.

Did holding Stephen's coat allow him to see what Stephen saw? Even if it did, it still wouldnt mean it was true, just something that Saul got off of Stephen at that moment in time.