Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After Win, Specter Looks To Fall Election (already distancing himself from Bush)
Associated Press | April 29, 2004 | Lara Jakes Jordon

Posted on 04/29/2004 6:27:24 AM PDT by Russ

Apr 28, 4:50 PM EDT

After Win, Specter Looks to Fall Election

By LARA JAKES JORDAN Associated Press Writer

PHILADELPHIA (AP) -- After surviving a close scrape in the Republican primary, Sen. Arlen Specter turned his attention to the fall contest and began a campaign Wednesday that could put him at odds with the White House that helped him pull through.

The four-term moderate narrowly defeated conservative Rep. Pat Toomey, 51 percent to 49 percent, in Tuesday's primary after Toomey branded Specter as too liberal. The race was perhaps the most serious challenge yet to any Senate incumbent this season.

Specter will face Democratic Rep. Joe Hoeffel in November.

Less than a day after his primary victory, Specter touted his efforts to trim tax cuts, retain overtime pay for workers, resist school vouchers and continue embryonic stem-cell research - all in opposition to President Bush. The four-term Republican also called the situation in Iraq a "tinderbox" that could be a problem for the president in the fall elections.

"I intend to retain my independent voice, a voice I have always had," Specter said. "The 12 million people of Pennsylvania have not elected me to be a rubber stamp, and I will speak out where I think the necessity calls for it."

Despite his policy differences with the president, Specter said Bush's public support was key to his victory over Toomey. The race was so tight, he said, that the usually stoic Specter could not "stop my nervous system from gyrating a little" while watching vote tallies roll in.

Hoeffel, meanwhile, embarked on a 19-stop tour to raise his low statewide profile. The three-term suburban Philadelphia lawmaker predicted that Specter moved too far to the right in the Republican race to be successful in November.

"This primary has demonstrated that Arlen Specter is not the senator that he used to be," Hoeffel said. "He used to be a moderate maverick, but he is neither of those things. He's voting for a Republican program in Washington that's not working in Pennsylvania. He's their senator now - not ours."

The Democrats blasted Specter as a "political opportunist."

"He has taken every side of every issue for no other reason than to protect his political hide," said Brad Woodhouse, a spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. "He owes his political survival to George Bush, and he's now stuck with him and his right-wing policies."

Registered Democratic voters outnumber Republicans in Pennsylvania by nearly 389,000.

Specter has long enjoyed support within liberal-leaning unions and abortion-rights groups, and predicted he would attract Democrats and independents. He said he could help Bush in the fall by pulling moderates to the GOP ticket.

"My agreements with the president are more extensive than my disagreements," Specter said.

Specter spent $10 million to win the primary. As of April 7, he had $4.5 million in his campaign bank account to Hoeffel's $800,000.

That makes Specter tough to beat in November, said Wilkes University political scientist Thomas J. Baldino.

Specter's near-loss "will give Hoeffel some hope," Baldino said. "But as bad a beating as Specter took in term of his reputation, he will continue to raise and spend enough money to demonstrate he can win."

---

.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2004; election; electionussenate; specter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 361-376 next last
To: gdc61
by the way thats a nice picture of your wife. (j/k)

I have no idea what you are talking about.

I don’t speak idiot.

141 posted on 04/29/2004 8:02:33 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard
Santorum barely won last night

Won what? PA doesn't have both Senate elections in the same year, does it?

142 posted on 04/29/2004 8:03:07 AM PDT by The kings dead (O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Formoore04
The evidence says exactly the opposite, but facts, I suppose, are not important in your world.
143 posted on 04/29/2004 8:03:15 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
One - what is a WBTS thread?

Two - you are, once again, proving how seriously engaged your mind is in lala land.
144 posted on 04/29/2004 8:05:14 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
I would add to that. Kerry is criticized for letting politics trump his religion. Bush also trumped his pro-life beliefs with politics.

Very true, again it just shows that politics as usual is more important than really standing for an issue.

145 posted on 04/29/2004 8:05:21 AM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Owen
What you posted has squat to do with the question, "How can Specter win if he does not appeal to at least a segment of the Dems?" and its implication that conservatives can't win in PA.
146 posted on 04/29/2004 8:05:38 AM PDT by The kings dead (O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
I would add to that. Kerry is criticized for letting politics trump his religion. Bush also trumped his pro-life beliefs with politics.

Very true, again it just shows that politics as usual is more important than really standing for an issue.

147 posted on 04/29/2004 8:06:04 AM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard
"The evidence says exactly the opposite, but facts, I suppose, are not important in your world."

What evidence? "Anyone who disagrees with me is an idiot!" Is not evidence, bucko.
148 posted on 04/29/2004 8:06:32 AM PDT by Formoore04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: RetroSexual
Read up on Hoeffel before you donate.
149 posted on 04/29/2004 8:07:39 AM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The kings dead
This comes from years of reading political history. It's my passion, so my best recommendation would be to start out with some of the best pieces on how Reagan won in the first place - Teddy White is a great place to start. Then look at those counties, and look at the migration of people from the Snow Belt to the Sun Belt.

The fact also remains that the Democratic Party has lost most of the so-called Reagan Democrats to just re-registration of voters. In the 80's, Democrats have a tremendous lead over Republicans in voter registration. Today, that edge is almost gone. Both parties are much more "pure" if we put it that way.
150 posted on 04/29/2004 8:08:20 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Formoore04
Notwithstanding the fact that the hypothetical reason is also true, Specter has voted for every single Bush appointee.
151 posted on 04/29/2004 8:09:00 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: The kings dead
I'm concerned that Santorum didn't have much pulling power in the party either.
152 posted on 04/29/2004 8:09:52 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Formoore04
Yeah, he just should have fallen on his sword and let Pat Toomey win because Toomey is the Second Coming.
153 posted on 04/29/2004 8:11:29 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Formoore04
Since when are you concerned about facts? You haven't posted any in this thread. All you've 'provided' is benighted tripe and a whiny, spoiled brat, immature response to a political battle.

You really want to send a message? Continue to support Toomey. He'll back Specter this time but the only way to get conservatives like him into office is to continue to support him. Who knows, maybe he can run against Santorum in 2006. But, deciding to pull the lever for Dems is a fairly irrational response.

BTW, you didn't see Reagan threaten to leave the party, go independent or support Carter because he lost to Ford in '76. You saw him fall into the background, gain a huge base of support, and then rule the world from 1980 until 1988. Why wouldn't that be a good tactic in this case as well?

154 posted on 04/29/2004 8:11:51 AM PDT by Solson (Conservatives are concerned with the'end'; Liberals about the 'means' and the 'particulars.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: All
Gee, I'm just shocked. Shocked, I tell you! After how many times I've been told that Specter is now indebted to the Bush Administration, I never saw this coming...

Of course, no doubt if/when Specter "Borks" another conservative judicial nominee, his supporters will tell us how this is all "strategery". Occam's Razor doesn't apply to the GOP -the organization is managing at least a dozen of the most secretive and complicated plots to advance conservatism ever devised. CFR, Prescription Drugs, Farm Bills, Education Bills, Specter support...it's all part of the Grand Plan.

155 posted on 04/29/2004 8:12:25 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard
look at the migration of people from the Snow Belt to the Sun Belt.

Assigning me research does not prove your claims. You don't have any proof, do you?

156 posted on 04/29/2004 8:12:26 AM PDT by The kings dead (O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard
He won 49% of the vote in 1994. Seriously.

And he WON in 2000, even while Bush lost PA. Your point was?

157 posted on 04/29/2004 8:14:01 AM PDT by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Solson
"BTW, you didn't see Reagan threaten to leave the party,"

LOL! He didn't threaten to--HE DID! You do understand he was a Democrat until the early 60's!

He had no use for blind party loyalty, just as I don't.
158 posted on 04/29/2004 8:14:21 AM PDT by Formoore04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Russ
After reading it again, it's so pathetic that I can't help but note all the RINO apologists coming on full speed...funny, in a really sad way. But, hey...that's your GOP for you.
159 posted on 04/29/2004 8:14:22 AM PDT by ApesForEvolution (FREE 3D On-line Golf Game - Independent Reseller of the Week: http://egolfinternational.com/wig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The kings dead
Question. Do you have access to the New York Times archives?

Seriously now, if not, I'll try to get you access.
160 posted on 04/29/2004 8:14:27 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 361-376 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson