Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After Win, Specter Looks To Fall Election (already distancing himself from Bush)
Associated Press | April 29, 2004 | Lara Jakes Jordon

Posted on 04/29/2004 6:27:24 AM PDT by Russ

Apr 28, 4:50 PM EDT

After Win, Specter Looks to Fall Election

By LARA JAKES JORDAN Associated Press Writer

PHILADELPHIA (AP) -- After surviving a close scrape in the Republican primary, Sen. Arlen Specter turned his attention to the fall contest and began a campaign Wednesday that could put him at odds with the White House that helped him pull through.

The four-term moderate narrowly defeated conservative Rep. Pat Toomey, 51 percent to 49 percent, in Tuesday's primary after Toomey branded Specter as too liberal. The race was perhaps the most serious challenge yet to any Senate incumbent this season.

Specter will face Democratic Rep. Joe Hoeffel in November.

Less than a day after his primary victory, Specter touted his efforts to trim tax cuts, retain overtime pay for workers, resist school vouchers and continue embryonic stem-cell research - all in opposition to President Bush. The four-term Republican also called the situation in Iraq a "tinderbox" that could be a problem for the president in the fall elections.

"I intend to retain my independent voice, a voice I have always had," Specter said. "The 12 million people of Pennsylvania have not elected me to be a rubber stamp, and I will speak out where I think the necessity calls for it."

Despite his policy differences with the president, Specter said Bush's public support was key to his victory over Toomey. The race was so tight, he said, that the usually stoic Specter could not "stop my nervous system from gyrating a little" while watching vote tallies roll in.

Hoeffel, meanwhile, embarked on a 19-stop tour to raise his low statewide profile. The three-term suburban Philadelphia lawmaker predicted that Specter moved too far to the right in the Republican race to be successful in November.

"This primary has demonstrated that Arlen Specter is not the senator that he used to be," Hoeffel said. "He used to be a moderate maverick, but he is neither of those things. He's voting for a Republican program in Washington that's not working in Pennsylvania. He's their senator now - not ours."

The Democrats blasted Specter as a "political opportunist."

"He has taken every side of every issue for no other reason than to protect his political hide," said Brad Woodhouse, a spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. "He owes his political survival to George Bush, and he's now stuck with him and his right-wing policies."

Registered Democratic voters outnumber Republicans in Pennsylvania by nearly 389,000.

Specter has long enjoyed support within liberal-leaning unions and abortion-rights groups, and predicted he would attract Democrats and independents. He said he could help Bush in the fall by pulling moderates to the GOP ticket.

"My agreements with the president are more extensive than my disagreements," Specter said.

Specter spent $10 million to win the primary. As of April 7, he had $4.5 million in his campaign bank account to Hoeffel's $800,000.

That makes Specter tough to beat in November, said Wilkes University political scientist Thomas J. Baldino.

Specter's near-loss "will give Hoeffel some hope," Baldino said. "But as bad a beating as Specter took in term of his reputation, he will continue to raise and spend enough money to demonstrate he can win."

---

.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2004; election; electionussenate; specter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-376 next last
It took Specter less than 24 hours to start turning his back on Bush and Santorum and heading back to his leftist supporters in the Democrat Party. I hope all those conservatives who voted for him are happy now. I will vote for the Green Party candidate in Nov. before I will vote for Specter.
1 posted on 04/29/2004 6:27:24 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Russ
Less than a day after his primary victory, Specter touted his efforts to trim tax cuts, retain overtime pay for workers, resist school vouchers and continue embryonic stem-cell research - all in opposition to President Bush.

Take a bow, all you keen FR political strategists who told us how supporting Specter would advance conservatism.

2 posted on 04/29/2004 6:30:10 AM PDT by The kings dead (O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russ
We were already aware of these details, and it comes as no surprise that Senator Specter would attempt to back to the center to win the general election.
3 posted on 04/29/2004 6:30:24 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russ
He's just playing the game. You think Santorum or GWB are surprised by this? They made a calculated choice. I'd love to hear off the record Santorum's rationale for that choice, out of curiosity.
4 posted on 04/29/2004 6:30:45 AM PDT by Huck (In the Soviet Union, the Admin Moderators ruled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russ
Grrrrrrrr!
5 posted on 04/29/2004 6:33:11 AM PDT by stevio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
the rationale would most likely be that incumbents are favored to win.
they need to keep as many seats as they can due to unexpected retirements and close calls like Colorado, OK and Alaska.
6 posted on 04/29/2004 6:33:54 AM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard
It sounds to me like he's moving a little farther than to the "center". He's a political scoundral the likes of which Pennsylvanians have seldom seen, unless we look at his pal the Governor...
7 posted on 04/29/2004 6:35:10 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Russ
I've rarely voted for a Democrat, and have never given money to one, but I might make a small contribution to the Hoeffel campaign. Specter has to be stopped, and I see little difference between him and a typical Democrat, except that the Dem will not head the Judiciary committee. Thoughts?
8 posted on 04/29/2004 6:35:20 AM PDT by RetroSexual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russ
I saw Arlen's little anti-Bush tirade on FNC, it made me wanna puke.

And this maggot Arlen is going to be the NEXT chairman of the judiciary committee if the republicans hold the senate. Dubya can kiss all his judges bye-bye. Sen Sphincter won't even let them out of committee. He'll join up with Chuckie Schmuckster and the rest of the RATS.

And Arlen still says his fighting for Clarence Thomas was his biggest mistake and won't make one like it again. The RATS have won.

9 posted on 04/29/2004 6:36:11 AM PDT by Condor51 ("Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments." -- Frederick the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The kings dead
First of all, I supported Toomey.

Second of all, I support Specter vs. any Dem short of Zell Miller.

Third of all, moving to the center in a general election where Dems outnumber Repubs by 1/3 million is hardly unusual or unexpected.

What it does suggest is what many people here guessed: that in the general Toomey would have had a harder time.

10 posted on 04/29/2004 6:37:45 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Less than a day after his primary victory, Specter touted his efforts to trim tax cuts, retain overtime pay for workers, resist school vouchers and continue embryonic stem-cell research - all in opposition to President Bush. The four-term Republican also called the situation in Iraq a "tinderbox" that could be a problem for the president in the fall elections.

Hey! Your boy won! Congratulations!

Head of the Judiciary Committee as well! What a victory for conservatism coast to coast.

11 posted on 04/29/2004 6:38:33 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russ
I believe it is imparitive that Specter NOT get reelected in November. I am a very conservative Toomey supporter but will be voting for a liberal demacrat come Nov.

GO HOUFFEL!!! (or how ever its spelled)
12 posted on 04/29/2004 6:39:24 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russ
I don't blame Bush or Santorum. I blame the Republican voters of Pennsylvania. Thanks a lot.
13 posted on 04/29/2004 6:40:09 AM PDT by CaptainK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
ping
14 posted on 04/29/2004 6:40:12 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RetroSexual
Please. If you cannot morally vote for Specter, then you cannot morally vote for Hoeffel. Don't think we're stupid. If you can't vote for a pro-choice Republican, then you certainly cannot vote a pro-choice Democrat, unless you are one of two things. A Democrat or a liar.
15 posted on 04/29/2004 6:40:24 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LS
What it does suggest is what many people here guessed: that in the general Toomey would have had a harder time.

If that were the case, then Santorum would not be Senator.

16 posted on 04/29/2004 6:40:33 AM PDT by Coop (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Coop
He won 49% of the vote in 1994. Seriously.
17 posted on 04/29/2004 6:41:23 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gdc61
I believe it is imparitive that Specter NOT get reelected in November. I am a very conservative Toomey supporter but will be voting for a liberal demacrat come Nov.

Then you will go against the expressed wishes of the candidate that you supported, Toomey.

Toomey has endorsed Spector.

18 posted on 04/29/2004 6:41:24 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Russ
When elected, do politicians owe their loyalty to their Party, or to their constituents?
19 posted on 04/29/2004 6:42:24 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Pátria, pero sin amo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
You and me both. I can't imagine why GWB and Santorum didn't support Toomy. But then again, I can't understand half of what they have done in Washington in the last 3 years.

They have expanded spending, they took away my right to political free speech while protecting incumbents....go figure.

20 posted on 04/29/2004 6:42:35 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-376 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson