Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parole Saddam? Lew Rockwell on peace and reconciliation in Iraq.
Lew Rockwell.com ^ | 4 May 04 | Lew Rockwell

Posted on 05/05/2004 9:45:53 AM PDT by u-89

From the LRC Blog:

Whatever Happened to Hate Mail?

Posted by Lew Rockwell at 11:11 AM

When I wrote about the US spy plane in China a few years ago, and said China was within its rights to act as it did (and that the US claimed the right to shoot down such planes off its shores), I received more than 600 hate emails, including a number of death threats. I've also received plenty of hate mail in response to articles on Iraq. But over the last year, the number of such messages has dwindled. Yesterday's article on freeing Saddam resulted in many nice emails, and only two critical ones, and those were civil. There was no hate mail at all. Of course, the warmongers may have given up on me. But I think the most fervent have lost heart, and that is all to the good, since it presages even less public support for federal killing and maiming.

And here's the article -

The Status Quo Ante

by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

The US has lost the war. Now its efforts in Iraq will be defined for the history books by the photos of psychosexual torture methods used by US soldiers and civilian contractors in Baghdad. There is no avoiding this. The mask as moral liberator was ripped off long ago. The danger now is that the US presence will live up to the worst caricature of the most fundamentalist Islamic cleric.

What must the US do to dig out of disaster? What must the US do to make it right? The US strategy now is to try to put the head back on the body by reinstalling former Baathists in positions of power. The fear, of course, is that this will only further infuriate the Shiites. Trying to sort through all this, the US is frantically studying how Saddam was able to maintain order and political stability, and doing its best to replicate this feat. The problem is that even Saddam's top henchmen cannot enjoy legitimacy if the public perceives them as tools of the US.

Clearly, nostalgia for Saddam is sweeping all sectors. The experience of Jasim Muhammad Saleh demonstrates this. He is a former general of Saddam's Republican Guard. When the US pulled back from Fallujah – the first really smart thing the US has done in this entire war – he drove into the city wearing his old uniform and was cheered. He was the de facto head of state in that city, his legitimacy deriving entirely from his association with the old regime.

So too with the new commander of Iraq's army, Amer Bakr al-Hashimi, who publicly announced that he is "proud" to have served Saddam. What is the US to do? Making such statements only reinforces his status. Punishing him does the same. Replacing him will only destabilize matters more. Day by day, the US is realizing that the status quo ante is the only way out, but US officials are unsure how or to what extent it can go back.

In some way, there is no going back. Many thousands are dead and tens of thousands are wounded, civilians and soldiers. Mosques have been bombed and cities destroyed. The US made mass graves necessary. What was left of civilization in Iraq after the sanctions was nearly eradicated, and for no cause. There were no WMDs. There was no connection to 9-11. This war was a malevolent hoax.

 

It is preposterous for anyone to speak of democracy in Iraq so long as Saddam Hussein is in an official spider hole.

   

Whatever war propaganda said about Saddam's evil has been turned back on the US: torture chambers, rape rooms, outlawing dissent, and all the rest.

Yes, the troops ought to come home. When? As soon as they can get packed. The same goes for the phonies calling themselves the "Coalition Provisional Authority." All these bureaucrats need to admit is that they have no legitimacy at all, but rather acted as civilian cover for a martial law junta that ruled by blood and lies. Then the UN can work with Islamic clerics, the merchant class, and other Iraqi leaders to fill the void, not with force but with peace.

And yet a straight pullout from Iraq at this point only goes so far. Iraq is left with devastation and death. A generation of Muslims has been taught by this war to hate and despise American influence. The hard core among them will be easy recruits in a terrorist army that will last until kingdom come, always threatening and always providing a pretext for our own government to increase its despotic control over American life.

What can be done to prevent this awful scenario? The US government must apologize, or at least eat a truckload of humble pie. It needs to do everything possible to admit wrongdoing, through both symbolic and substantial acts of penance. This is essential for showing the Arab world that we too recognize that a grave injustice has been done. Insofar as it is possible, acts of public humility will help reverse the damage and help prevent acts of vengeance.

But such expressions will only be symbolic. They need to be matched by substantive acts as well. Perhaps the US can assist in establishing something resembling a representative democracy in Iraq, or at least not deliver the final death blow of permitting an Islamic dictatorship to arise in what used to be the most liberally-minded nation in the region. This cannot be done by the US as such, but under the guidance of an international delegation of the sort that Jimmy Carter has led in the past, operating again under the aegis of the UN.

This isn't just my idea. All people of good will (and, yes, that excludes the entire war cabal in the Bush administration) would immediately view this scenario as the most humane and viable transition from ghastly war to restorative peace.

At the same time, it is preposterous for anyone to speak of democracy in Iraq so long as Saddam Hussein is in an official spider hole. He was unseated on a basis that is contrary to all standards of legal conduct between nations. The US decided on its own that he should no longer be the president of Iraq – the very thing all norms of international law are designed to prevent. No government needs to be permanent, but those who pose no threat to international peace should be managed, controlled, or overthrown by their own citizens.

The end is unjustified by the means used. There is no moral nor legal basis (other than might makes right) for Saddam to be held by the US, much less subjected to a kangaroo court staffed by neoconservative conspirators. Saddam must be immediately released and escorted back to Iraq under the protection of an international delegation. At that point, Carter can supervise elections with Saddam among the candidates. And yes, it’s not impossible that he might win.

Is this a shocking suggestion? Yes, and I hesitate to be the first one to say publicly what so many people – including ex-government officials and long-time foreign policy commentators – have been saying privately for months. But at some point, such thoughts will become commonplace. It is a fact that this war was unjust. Releasing him would at least concede that the US was wrong to wage it. This is the first step toward ending the bloodshed and terror.

In fact, there is no other option for Iraq at this point. Phony polls aside, the US has made Saddam more popular than when he was in power. The US can choose between keeping Saddam locked up and thereby continue to stir the pot, leading to ever more violence, or it can release Saddam without any charges against him – let alone by Ahmed Chalabi's son – and have a hope for reconciliation and peace.

Let's deal with a number of objections to releasing Saddam.

He is a tyrant, a liar, a killer, and the new Hitler. We've been hearing this for so long that it is tough to separate the truth from the war propaganda. It was the Bush administration and not Saddam that turned out to be lying about WMDs. As for the other charges, Putin is also a killer and a tyrant. He has killed "his own people" in Chechnya. The US doesn't dispute his legitimacy. In fact, the world is strewn with despots, many of them our allies. The US has no veto power over the leadership of countries in far corners of the world, much less the right to kidnap and try them. Yes, many Iraqis hated Saddam, but the US had no business deciding on its own to unseat him. That should be left to the Iraqi people.

He will return to slaughter his enemies. In fact, he might well return anxious to disprove all the claims made against him. Under the eye of human rights organizations, the press, and the UN, he will have every incentive to behave in a humanitarian way. Even as head of state, he would face pressure to be liberally minded. His rule would be shaky at best; if it turns out to be short-lived, that's fine too, because the revolution would be from within.

The US will lose credibility. Actually, the US has already lost credibility. A reversal on this scale is the only way to bring it back. It is also the last thing that al Qaeda wants, because it would remove a main source of its case for recruiting new terrorists. If the US turns on a dime to become reasonable, humanitarian, and peacefully minded, the terrorists lose rationale for a campaign of vengeance. And the US gains credibility by admitting the truth, and by undertaking a dramatic gesture to right history.

This would reward despotism. It's hard to see how being released from captivity after having your sons slaughtered and your entire life destroyed is a reward for despotism. All it does is grant some small measure of international justice in an impossibly grotesque environment. Also, we must think about the message that keeping Saddam in prison sends. It says that the end justifies the means, and powerful states with WMDs like the US can get away with anything. That is not a good message for the world. The US will continue to pay for this disastrous war so long as it holds Saddam.

This would reverse the one decent accomplishment of the war. And so long as Saddam is in prison, the US will be free to claim that all the bloodshed and the bloody taxes at least accomplished this one great thing. The US government must be denied this prize. The Muslim world cannot continue to think that the US is self-satisfied or that the Bush administration got what it wanted in the end. If the US were required to return Saddam and pull out of Iraq, it would say to the world: aggression will not be rewarded.

Yes, there are a thousand other issues to sort out. What about the billions in damage and theft? Who will compensate the families of the dead? What other actions can the US take that will encourage reconciliation? All these issues must be faced squarely and truthfully. It will be painful. But we must remember that this war has been ghastly, and that a future without justice will be more painful still.

How will George Bush explain to the families of dead US soldiers why he is having to restore the status quo ante? He should begin with the tenth-century prayer said first by the powerful, who sought forgiveness for their sins:

Confiteor Deo omnipotenti…
quia peccavi nimis cogitatione,
verbo, et opere:

mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

May 4, 2004

Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. [send him mail] is president of the Ludwig von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, editor of LewRockwell.com and author of Speaking of Liberty.

Copyright © 2004 LewRockwell.com

Lew Rockwell Archives



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: bush; iraq; lewrockwell; lewsers; rockwell; saddam; terror; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 05/05/2004 9:45:54 AM PDT by u-89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: u-89
WRONG- we should THREATEN to release him if the Iraqi's don't shape up...
2 posted on 05/05/2004 9:47:33 AM PDT by Mr. K (`,,`,,I stole this cuz its funny,,`,,`))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: u-89
Gee I dunno. It couldn't be that Lew Rockwell is completely irrelevant.

BTW, who's Lew Rockwell?
3 posted on 05/05/2004 9:48:30 AM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: u-89
Beneath contempt.
4 posted on 05/05/2004 9:49:18 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Put him on display in stocks in the middle of Baghdad and then run a pool on how long he lasts.
5 posted on 05/05/2004 9:50:36 AM PDT by alancarp (NASCAR: Where everything's made up and the points don't matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: u-89
I am all for paroling Saddam right after the new Iraqi government executes him.
6 posted on 05/05/2004 9:50:51 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: u-89
Yesterday's article on freeing Saddam resulted in many nice emails, and only two critical ones, and those were civil. There was no hate mail at all. Of course, the warmongers may have given up on me. But I think the most fervent have lost heart, and that is all to the good, since it presages even less public support for federal killing and maiming.

Don't flatter yourself, Lew. You are just being ignored more and more.

And that is all to the good.


A.K.A. Sleepy Brown

7 posted on 05/05/2004 9:51:08 AM PDT by rdb3 (Let others praise ancient times; I am glad I was born in these.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: u-89
This is a waste of space.
8 posted on 05/05/2004 9:51:24 AM PDT by Columbine (Bush '04 - Owens '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Lew Rockwell's friends and family need to do an intervention. Whatever controlled substance he's ingesting has done tremendous damage to his faculties.
9 posted on 05/05/2004 9:52:01 AM PDT by Poohbah (Darkdrake Lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
WRONG- we should THREATEN to release him if the Iraqi's don't shape up...

What do you think we're doing in Fallujah? (c8

10 posted on 05/05/2004 9:52:58 AM PDT by Poohbah (Darkdrake Lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: u-89
I suspect that Bush and Co. will be so vindicated by putting Saddam on trial that the dims will be marginalized for years to come.
11 posted on 05/05/2004 9:53:34 AM PDT by tkathy (nihilism: absolute destructiveness toward the world at large and oneself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: u-89
Yawn Lew who?
12 posted on 05/05/2004 9:54:37 AM PDT by kimoajax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: u-89
If I was this guy's kid, I'd be scared to death at how he chose my babysitters...
13 posted on 05/05/2004 9:56:54 AM PDT by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: u-89
What world is this guy living in?

We are at war with international terrorism.

Iraq was a nation hosting those terrorists and attempting to secure or develop WMD if they hadn't secured them already, in order to replicate Oklahoma City and the Wordl Trade Center on a grander scale.

We can't loose in Iraq. The consequences are totally unacceptable.

And Iraq is just ONE battle in a continuing war against an ideology which out to destroy us and our culture and ruin the world for our children and grnadchildren by forcing them to live in thrall to a religious belief system which created the Taliban and Al Quaida.
14 posted on 05/05/2004 9:59:46 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Lew, you ignorant slut.

Armchair REMF military prodigy Lew Rockwell declares the war in Iraq has been lost.
15 posted on 05/05/2004 10:01:02 AM PDT by Belisaurius ("Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, Ted" - Joseph Kennedy 1958)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: u-89
Stellar evidence that Rockwell and his ilk are nothing more than children at play, always looking to see how outrageously they can shock the adults.

I have nothing but contempt for them.

16 posted on 05/05/2004 10:01:43 AM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Lew is so far out on the right that he's swung around to the far left, and is now sitting in the bleachers with Karen the crazy Light Colonel, Veterans for Peace (founded to protest Gulf War 1), and International ANSWER (everyone's favorite North Korean front group).
17 posted on 05/05/2004 10:04:40 AM PDT by Belisaurius ("Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, Ted" - Joseph Kennedy 1958)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment
BTW, who's Lew Rockwell?

Llewellyn Somebody.

I think he is that dead guy who play "Q" in the James Bond movies.

18 posted on 05/05/2004 10:05:19 AM PDT by dinasour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I don't know what to call this guy.

Too many decent creatures would be offended...
19 posted on 05/05/2004 10:07:43 AM PDT by hchutch (Tommy Thompson's ephedra ban STINKS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dinasour
I think he is that dead guy who play "Q" in the James Bond movies.

No. I'm pretty sure he's the guy that married Darva Conger.

20 posted on 05/05/2004 10:11:48 AM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson