Posted on 05/18/2004 12:34:14 AM PDT by weegee
Moore rant wows Cannes
Anti-Bush polemic funny, emotional yet very powerful
Confident it will be released before the U.S. election
It took five separate screenings to accommodate the press demand to see Michael Moore's heavily anticipated anti-Bush documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 at the Cannes Film Festival yesterday, and when it came to turning up the political heat here, neither the movie nor its maker failed to disappoint.
The audience at a afternoon gala screening responded with a 20-minute standing ovation. Festival artistic director Thierry Fremaux told the New York Times it was the longest he had ever witnessed in Cannes.
A scorching indictment of the current U.S. administration's military engagement in Iraq that colours the entire enterprise as being rooted in the Bush family's business relations with Saudi oil money and members of Osama Bin Laden's family — and featuring some harrowing footage shot by freelance camera crews of prisoner abuse, bombed Iraqi civilians and dead-of-night military raids on Iraqi homes — Fahrenheit 9/11 is a considerably more sober, impassioned and focused film than Moore's previous record-breaking box office documentary success Bowling For Columbine. It also features, for better or worse, considerably less Michael Moore on screen.
Following a narrative line that traces President George W. Bush's military record, business ventures, political history and pre- and post-9/11 presidency, the film meticulously lays out a deeply sinister and cynical conspiracy that ends up with powerfully graphic — and many previously unseen — images of dead and mutilated bodies on both sides of the current conflict.
The implication is as clear as it is unsubtle: Moore is laying the deaths of thousands of Iraqis and coalition forces right on the front steps of the White House, and purely for the purposes of economic gain.
While inescapably a partisan and flatly polemical work, Fahrenheit 9/11 makes its case meticulously and convincingly, and uses all of the pop cultural rhetorical methods that have made the director not only the most popular documentary maker of his generation, but one of the most prominent American figures lashing out against the Bush administration: He knows how to talk in the language of TV.
At one point in the film Bush is seen in the primary school classroom where he first learned of the planes being flown into the World Trade Center towers, and Moore slows the footage down so that Bush is seen to be blinking uncomprehendingly and endlessly, a child's storybook open ridiculously before him, as a counter in the corner of the screen counts out the nine minutes before the President seemed to react.
"What was he thinking?" Moore's voiceover asks. Later, he surmises what the President might have been thinking over an image of Saddam Hussein: "I think I'd better blame this guy."
Elsewhere, the plane carrying certain Bush-connected members of the Bin Laden family out of the United States on the morning of the attacks takes to the air with the Animals' "We Gotta Get Out of This Place" roars on the soundtrack.
In possibly the most emotionally powerful moment of the film, a mother who lost her son in the war goes to the White House and to be confronted by another woman who insists that all the anti-war activity going on there is just "staged."
"My son is dead," she says, tears and fury rising in her eyes. "That wasn't staged."
Certain to be divisive and controversial, and already the subject of considerable discussion concerning its troubled distribution history first with Mel Gibson's Icon Pictures (which Moore alleges dropped the film because of high-level and possibly even administration interference) and more recently the Walt Disney Company, Fahrenheit 9/11 seems expressly designed to mobilize viewers to get out and vote against George W. Bush this November.
First it needs to find distributor, however. Currently without one, Moore is nevertheless completely confident that someone will pick up the film and get it out a widely and immediately as he'd like.
He's undoubtedly right — if as much for economic as political reasons. If Columbine was any indication, this movie could make a pile.
Yet, while Moore's insistence that "this film will open in the United States before the election" and in "shopping malls and multiplexes" instead of art houses — he has also said he'd like to see it available on DVD by October — he played curiously coy in the post-screening press conference when asked directly if he hoped the movie might serve to hinder President Bush's chances of re-election in November. "I just make movies I'd like to see on a Friday night," he shrugged.
It was perhaps the only question that suggested such a neutrally entertaining agenda. On every other matter, from Bush's relationship with Tony Blair ("What's Blair doing with this guy?" he asked of British journalists), to what he'd like viewers to get from the film ("I want them to be in shock and in awe") to the current climate of mainstream media silence on Iraq ("Americans do not like things being kept from them"), Moore seemed to stress both the urgency and immediacy of the movie's mission. But he wouldn't agree that the movie has been designed to vote Bush out.
Describing a relationship with the Miramax production company that allowed him to add any additional material he needed between now the release to keep the film up to date, he said he remained undecided as to whether he'd change the film to accommodate either current or future developments from Washington or Iraq. "I might, but this is a complete work."
On the issue of his own relative absence in the film — in which he appears on screen perhaps one-fifth of the time he was on in Bowling For Columbine — save for voiceover and general editorial point of view, Moore said, "This time I was the straight man. Bush wrote all the best lines."
"The subject just didn't need the help," he added. "Besides, a little of me tends to go along way. And sometimes less is better."
When no one stood to take issue with Moore on this point, he was asked if he planned on screening Fahrenheit 9/11 at the White House.
It was his turn to laugh. "I would love to have a White House screening," he deadpanned.
"I would attend it. And I would behave."
Seems unlikely. God knows, if there's any place where a little Michael Moore will go a long way, especially after this movie opens this summer across America, it will be in the White House.
Get ready to disect the lies now.
Maybe we could start a LumpyRiefenstahl-411 Michael Moore counter-information sidebar thread?
I wonder if he mentions that the liberals' darling, Richard Clarke, was the one who approved the flight out. And it wasn't the morning of the attacks, either.
It sounds like Pevere is getting paid by Moore. He's exactly what Moore needs: someone stupid enough to believe his lies. And there are plenty more in Big Media who are ready and willing to do just that.
Not just yet. We need to make sure he's stuck with the product. If we point out his obvious fabrications now, he can make changes to the film before it's full release. After that we hit him, and hard.
Quite the difference between this article and another posted thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1137611/posts
I'm apt to believe that the article that says the movie sucks is more accurate.
I included a quote from this review in another thread to show that Michael Moore manipulated footage. Here he has slowed down the response President Bush gave when he heard about the attacks.
A propandista at work.
I wasn't trying to say that you agreed with the author. Actually, I figured you didn't. I ws just saying the movie probably sucked.
The author of the other article have given Moore a four star rating for 'Bowling' back when Moore was the left's little sweetheart. I have a feeling that may not be the case any longer. More reviews will show.
ws=was
have given=gave
....my English teacher would be so disappointed.
I figured I'd defend my choice in adding "another one". The description of the slowed down clip was the main reason.
This movie and its creator are a pile. A pile of crap.
It's good to see the Liberals happy about something, even if they have to be complete jackasses and idiots relishing all the lies spun as truth. They've all been on suicide watch for going on 2 years now.
What other reaction would one expect from the eunuchs, psychos and heroin insipids at Cannes...The Devil is working feverishly overtime on George W. Bush.....This will be indeed examined very closely by good people - and there will be a scathing indictment of it and its foul-mouthed maker. The potential harm of this - not only to W. but to the entire nation - can not be underestimated. It is truly an act of treason in a time of war for our survival. As that, it is an act of war itself. It epitomizes the radical left as it always has been and as it will always be - hateful, slanderous, murderous.
Isn't Cannes in FRANCE? The home of our "Friends" we supposedly abandoned to fight the War on Terror.
I saw some photos of him at Cannes. He's really gotten HUGE. LMAO.
The Toronto Star is one of the most Liberal Canadian Papers...
He doesn't have to. Geoff Pevere is a lefty cheerleader. His previous gig was with the CBC.
Mr. Pevere, Moore's "Ferret-hype" will appeal to people living in bottomless pits of stupidity. Looks like you're a resident.
Moore and the Toronto Star and Cresent were made for each other.
The Truimph of Ill Will
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.