Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Legalize Incest' Suggestion Shocks Lawmakers
Crosswalk ^ | May 21st, 2004 | Patrick Goodenough

Posted on 05/21/2004 4:18:01 PM PDT by missyme

Pacific Rim Bureau (CNSNews.com) - A respected academic in New Zealand has recommended that incest between consenting adults be legalized, playing down any concerns about the genetic abnormalities resulting from inbreeding.

Professor Peter Munz, professor emeritus of history at Wellington's Victoria University, stunned lawmakers who are considering amendments to criminal law by proposing that it was no longer necessary to outlaw sex between close relations.

He argued that, historically, incest was illegal because it was considered a waste of an asset to have women marry close to home. Women played an important role when one tribe wanted to create an alliance with another, he said.

"It was indeed a crime to waste good, nubile women on local people who were allies already, instead of using them to bring in new allies, new friends, new trade opportunities..." Munz said in a written submission

In modern society, however, women were no longer required for marriage alliances, he argued. The incest prohibition had "lingered on needlessly" but was clearly no longer required.

Munz, a scholar whose books have been published internationally, also asserted that the likelihood that any children resulting from incestuous intercourse would suffer genetic defects was not a sufficiently good reason for making incest illegal.

Any such damage would be sporadic, and in any case, "be eliminated after several generations."

Sexual attraction between members of a family who had grown up together was minimal, he said.

"Today, if siblings - against all odds - should fall in love with each other, they should be welcome to it."

After reading Munz' written submission, members of the parliament's Law and Order Committee had the opportunity to question the professor.

But according to committee vice-chairman, Marc Alexander, lawmakers were so shocked they chose not to discuss the matter further with him.

"We were absolutely stunned when the read the submission, and couldn't believe that anybody could possibly entertain the idea of decriminalizing incest," Alexander said Friday. "It was just unbelievable."

"None of us was willing to give him five minutes. We just didn't want to dignify his comments at all."

Alexander said he did not believe Munz' interest was merely "a single person's quest for some sort of bizarre truth. I presume that he has loyal followers who basically want to push this."

Although Munz only argued for legalizing incest between consenting adults, Alexander said his personal view was that the proposal was merely a "forerunner" of pedophilia. "I can see a potential link between the two."

"Once you loosen the bonds of incest, where do you go from there?"

Also critical of Munz' suggestions was New Zealand's Maxim Institute, a conservative think tank.

"In a culture that has exalted consent as the ultimate sexual ethic, why would we be surprised?" a representative asked.

"What will be next: the claim that consensual incest is a human right and to oppose it is 'familial' discrimination?"

'Genetic improvement'

In a phone interview Friday, Munz said he was surprised that lawmakers had not bothered to discuss the submission with him.

"I was struck by the lack of knowledge or interest. It's really a sobering thought to think that our laws are in the hands of people who are so ... disinterested and ignorant."

The single question he had been asked before the committee put aside his submission was: "Have you discussed this with women?" - which he took to be a tetchy response to his suggestion that women had been "used" historically to secure alliances with other tribes.

Asked to elaborate on his point regarding inbreeding, Munz said that according to genetics theory, "if you practice incest consistently over a period, receptive genes are likely to come up, which of course would be very bad."

"But it has also been found that if you continue to practice incest systematically, the recessive genes will automatically be weeded out, and only the dominant ones will come up."

In such a case, he said, "that would probably be an improvement in the genetic quality of mankind."

Munz conceded that this was a purely theoretical argument: No-one was going to practice incest for generations to prove the point.

Duress

Incest is banned around the world, although countries vary in their interpretation, with some allowing sexual relations between first cousins, for example.

In Australia in 1996, a discussion paper drawn up by a law reform committee proposed lifting the ban on incest between consenting adults.

Following a public outcry, the idea was dropped, although the committee members attributed the row to misunderstandings that its proposal would have legalized sexual relations between parents and minor children.

Professor Sheila Jeffreys of the University of Melbourne in Australia said Friday that once incest between adults is decriminalized, the issue of whether one person is being pressured or coerced becomes hazy.

"The problem is being able to recognize the duress. If you decriminalize it, it may be hard to recognize the duress, which is almost certainly from the older, and usually male, partner."

In Britain early last century, authorities would arrest both partners suspected to be in an incestuous relationship, Jeffreys said.

"There was no recognition of a power relationship going on, and of course there is almost inevitably a power relationship [involved]."

This week's incident in Wellington comes at a time conservative opponents of same-sex "marriage" are arguing that legalizing it will lead to the end of other sexual taboos, such as incest and bestiality.

Last year, Senator Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) was at the center of a storm after being accused of linking homosexual sexual relations with other sexual activities that are generally frowned upon.

"If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [homosexual] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything," he was quoted as telling an Associated Press reporter.

Santorum was commenting on a legal challenge to Texas' sodomy law, then underway.

After he was criticized by homosexual activists and some politicians, the senator said his remarks did not constitute a statement on "individual lifestyles," but had related to "the right of privacy and the broader implications of a ruling on other state privacy laws."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: incest; lawrencevtexas; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: missyme

Isn't there something in our DNA that prevents us from wanting to mate with siblings?


41 posted on 05/21/2004 8:24:24 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Inquiring minds would like to know .....What about "extended families"...children brought into a marriage from both partners, now become "brothers and sisters"..How will they fare in all of this when a mutual attraction presents itself???


42 posted on 05/22/2004 4:33:43 AM PDT by ejo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: missyme
I'm 100% for this. Gay marriage is not enough. I can't afford the plane fare to Cambridge Massachusetts for me and my significant mother. I want incest and animalism made legal with a constitutional amendment.

FREE THE BEASTS! Free our inner beasts so we can eat 9 lives tunafish (cheaper). It's delish on mac and cheese.
43 posted on 05/22/2004 4:39:54 AM PDT by dennisw (Koran teaches: "Cut off their heads, and cut off the tips of their fingers." (Sura 8:12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejo
Inquiring minds would like to know .....What about "extended families"...children brought into a marriage from both partners, now become "brothers and sisters"..How will they fare in all of this when a mutual attraction presents itself???

Go ask Woody Allen. Hot for the step daughter.

44 posted on 05/22/2004 4:41:51 AM PDT by dennisw (Koran teaches: "Cut off their heads, and cut off the tips of their fingers." (Sura 8:12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cavtrooper21
The Cheeta is a poor example; it has been overrun by mankind - the ultimate predator.

Bees, ants, and house flies are closer to the point.

45 posted on 05/22/2004 9:26:01 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
First, it was gay marriage. Now it's incest. Next will be polygamy

I guess Hollywood will soon do a remake of "Seven Brides for Seven Brothers" as "Seven Brothers for Seven Brothers"

46 posted on 05/23/2004 12:12:13 AM PDT by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

Or, perhaps, "Seven Sisters for Their Seven Brothers".

...or maybe "The Brady Bunch Gone Wild".


47 posted on 05/23/2004 12:17:44 AM PDT by Redcloak (Have you hugged your tagline today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: curmudgeonII

The British Royal Family, prior to Princess Diana, makes a good case for the BAD traits coming out. She certainly improved the gene pool of that family.


48 posted on 05/23/2004 12:40:59 AM PDT by des
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: des
The British Royal Family, prior to Princess Diana, makes a good case for the BAD traits coming out. She certainly improved the gene pool of that family.

Any improvement that Princess Di made to the Royal Family certainly wasn't in the brain capacity category. Perhaps in beauty, although I'm old enough to remember that when the current queen was still a princess - before she got married- she was rather attractive.

49 posted on 05/23/2004 10:14:04 AM PDT by curmudgeonII (Time wounds all heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: curmudgeonII
Good biblical reasons. It's not as clean cut on genetic grounds.

The arabs have been inbreeding for millenia. Any questions?

50 posted on 05/23/2004 10:20:57 AM PDT by null and void (The owls are not what they seem...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cavtrooper21

See above.


51 posted on 05/23/2004 10:21:49 AM PDT by null and void (The owls are not what they seem...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: null and void
The arabs have been inbreeding for millenia. Any questions?

'Nuff said.

52 posted on 05/23/2004 10:51:09 AM PDT by curmudgeonII (Time wounds all heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: missyme

"Incest": A fun game the whole family can enjoy!


53 posted on 05/23/2004 11:03:27 AM PDT by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn incestuous gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
The RNC should run an ad- "Butthole Surfers for Kerry". That will create a whole new news cycle and lasting discussion:):) "Bush will make our surfing illegal" LOL

Strange ideas this morning...

54 posted on 05/23/2004 11:15:40 AM PDT by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: FBD; BraveMan; joanie-f
"'We were absolutely stunned when the read the submission, and couldn't believe that anybody could possibly entertain the idea of decriminalizing incest,' Alexander said Friday. 'It was just unbelievable.'"

Whaaaatttttt??
Doesn't this guy realize there're only so many things one can do with an ordinary anus?

Damned insensitive of him, don'tcha y'all think?

Why *this* is really nothing more than a fine, textbook example of evolution.

...ain't that right, *professor*.

55 posted on 05/23/2004 11:26:57 AM PDT by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

Does anyone remember the X Files episode about the Peacock family, West Virginians I think? It was about incest in the worst possible manifestations and carried an MA rating. It is almost never shown on TV and was too hot to handle for years.


56 posted on 05/23/2004 11:30:09 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: missyme

Really NOT surprising.


57 posted on 05/23/2004 11:30:27 AM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

,,, Peter Munz lives in a Wellington suburb called Brooklyn. He's lived in the same house since the 1960s. In those days he was regarded as being a bit non-standard by a lot of people in the area. It seems that he's perfected "non-standard" with age.


58 posted on 05/23/2004 1:41:36 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
LOL!

My goal is to be wealthy enough that people think I'm eccentric...
59 posted on 05/23/2004 1:48:22 PM PDT by null and void (The owls are not what they seem...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: null and void

,,, in achieving wealth you'll gain my high regard, but the Munz way gets no points in my book. It's headline grabbing at it's most pitiful.


60 posted on 05/23/2004 1:52:36 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson