Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christians look to form 'new nation' within U.S.
World Net Daily ^ | 4/24/04 | Joe Kovacs

Posted on 05/23/2004 11:54:30 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Calling the approval of same-sex marriage in Massachusetts "the straw that broke the camel's back," a group of Christian activists is in the beginning stages of an effort to have one state secede from the United States to become its own sovereign nation.

"Our Christian republic has declined into a pagan democracy," says Cory Burnell, president of ChristianExodus.org, a non-profit corporation based in Tyler, Texas. "There are some issues people just can't take anymore, and [same-sex marriage] might finally wake up the complacent Christians."

Burnell is leading the charge for a peaceful secession of one state from the union, and after originally considering Alabama, Mississippi and South Carolina due to their relatively small populations, coastal access, and the Christian nature of the electorate, Burnell says South Carolina has been selected as the target location.

The plan initially calls for at least 12,000 Christians willing to be active in political campaigns to move to the Palmetto State.

"We're not an invading force, we're reinforcements," Burnell tells WorldNetDaily, saying it would be a waste to move to liberal-minded states such as Massachusetts, New York or California where conservative votes would be diluted.

According to the ChristianExodus website, which is slated for a major relaunch next month, "Christians have actively tried to return our entire land to its moral foundation for more than 20 years. We can categorically say that absolutely nothing has been achieved. If you disagree, consider this:

* Abortion continues against the wishes of many states * Children may not pray in our schools * The Bible is not welcome in schools except under strict federal guidelines

* The 10 Commandments remain banned from public display * Sodomy is now legal and celebrated as 'diversity' rather than perversion

* Preaching Christianity will soon be outlawed as 'hate speech' * Gay marriage will be foisted upon us in the very near future

"All these atrocities continue in spite of the fact that we now have the 'right' people in places of power. Indeed, the occupant of the White House is a professing Christian. The U.S. attorney general is believed to be a devout Christian. 'Conservatives' control both Houses of Congress, and Republican presidents appointed seven of the nine Supreme Court justices."

The idea of moving thousands of people to affect the voting in one state is not new. As WorldNetDaily has previously reported, the Free State Project has goals of restoring certain personal liberties and limited government – but without seceding from the union. Last year, a group of 4,500 libertarians decided New Hampshire would be the best state.

S. Carolina state flag

Burnell, a math teacher and cell-phone dealer, stresses he's not looking for bloody battles that took place in the American Revolution and the Civil War, but is rather seeking a "political divorce."

"It's got to be different today," he says. "It has to be peaceful, brokered."

But he admits if the federal government decides to use military force to stop the effort, "Then it can't happen."

Already a dozen people are actively working on the project, and some 1,500 by e-mails of support have been received.

If all goes according to plan, Burnell is hoping to have a constitutional convention by 2014, with a president of the new nation – still to be known as South Carolina – elected in 2016, which is also a presidential election year in the U.S.

He says the nation would be founded on Christian principles, and the people writing its constitution would have to hash out details to safeguard it as a Christian republic.

For now, Burnell prefers to shy away from specifics on the precise laws governing the country.

"Independence first, details later," he says.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; christianexodus; christianity; freestateproject; reaction; secession; separatism; whackoalert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-354 next last
To: Semaphore Heathcliffe

bump.


161 posted on 05/25/2004 7:36:29 AM PDT by tame (Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: tame; All
I getting pretty tired of people comparing this to the Great American Revolution. The colonists were oppressed whereas nobody is denying you of your rights. Now I will go ahead and bring up "what about the rights of the unborn" for you and save you some time and mouse clicks. Well, last I heard your representatives were not refusing to take your calls, or blocking your emails. When they do, feel free to vote their sorry behinds out of office. The colonists did not have that option. End of Story. This wacko secession idea just doesn't compare.

I notice you haven't replied to the "when it fails, what then ?" Question. You KNOW it WILL fail. So what happens after that ?

162 posted on 05/25/2004 7:37:24 AM PDT by BSunday (If you're not right, you're wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Well, darn! That makes two (2) states that are going to have to succeed from the Union, One for the Libertarians in the cold frozen North East and one for the Christians in the warm sandy South East. Could Start a fad.
163 posted on 05/25/2004 7:39:06 AM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts (Keep your eye on the donut not on the hole!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #164 Removed by Moderator

To: BSunday
I getting pretty tired of people comparing this to the Great American Revolution.

It's WORSE than the colonists had it during the American Revolution. That's a fact.

The colonists were oppressed...

We are MORE oppressed than the Colonists were!

...whereas nobody is denying you of your rights.

What have you been smoking?!? My mother had a right to kill me before I was born, and as a Christian I barely have a right to breath in public schools, and I am a tax slave to the goverment, and you think my rights are not denied?!?

We're told we can't have prayer in public schools, Christians don't have as much rights as Radical Muslims do, in fact Christian are being forced into the closet as gays are coming out of the closet, the I.R.S....oh forget it, anybody who could make a comment as stuoid as that comment you made above is NOT going toget it.

last I heard your representatives were not refusing to take your calls, or blocking your emails.

Nazis took phone calls from Jews, too. It hardly meant they weren't killing them, too!

When they do, feel free to vote their sorry behinds out of office.

...the Supreme Court Justices are not taking my calls and I cannot vote them out of office.

The colonists did not have that option.

Nor do we. The Supreme Court has seen to it that their despotic power cannot be challenged.

I notice you haven't replied to the "when it fails, what then ?" Question. You KNOW it WILL fail. So what happens after that ?

I didn't repsond to it because it was a stuoid question, but I'll humor you. If we would have failed, then what? If my mom would not have ever had sex, then what? If We failed to stop Al Gore, then What? If the sky were green, then what? Well...it would be green. We would have failed trying to do the right thing, rather than succeeded at doing the wrong thing.

No offense, but you would need 27 promotions to be dense.

165 posted on 05/25/2004 8:08:34 AM PDT by tame (Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

If they get the Palmetto State, I hope it won't turn out like the Taliban's Afghanistan, with religious police, etc.

Using one of the original 13 to form a theocracy is ironic, to say the least.


166 posted on 05/25/2004 8:14:20 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BSunday
The colonists were oppressed whereas nobody is denying you of your rights

Where have you been for the last 30 years?

167 posted on 05/25/2004 8:43:40 AM PDT by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Rytwyng

Mississippi is a better choice. I saw a thread last week we are already considered the most pro life state in the union. Also it does have some oil reserves down south and well Haley Barbour for 6, like they gave Jeff Davis!


168 posted on 05/25/2004 9:04:56 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (Kerry: how can we trust him with our money, if Teresa won't trust him with hers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
I would pick Colorado myself.

You need ports.
A landlocked nation wouldn't be able to have the commerce without going through another country. That wouldn't be an option.

169 posted on 05/25/2004 9:09:23 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

LOL. Good point.


170 posted on 05/25/2004 10:16:34 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: BSunday
why don't you let me know where the government is forcing you to bow down to the emperor

The emperor's name is Sodomy, and we are being forced to bow down (dare I say, bend over...) and proclaim our loyalty in schools and workplaces. Californication public schools require "gay" education from 1st grade, to cite just one example. Nobody is forcing us to BE homosexual, but they are working very hard to force us to APPLAUD it. It's not enough to tolerate it but disagree -- they won't allow us to even disagree with it.

171 posted on 05/25/2004 10:23:46 AM PDT by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: mhx
Oh yeah, that worked real well last time.

If at first you don't secede, try, try again.

(As my Union Army greatgreatgrandfather rolls over in his grave...)

172 posted on 05/25/2004 10:33:21 AM PDT by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rytwyng

Nobody is forcing you to agree with anything. If you don't like what is being taught in schools, then either be more active, use the legislative process, or homeschool.


173 posted on 05/25/2004 10:38:39 AM PDT by BSunday (If you're not right, you're wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: BSunday
As a Christian I can't condone rebellion against authority, as God is the one who establishes the powers that be

In that case, how do you deal with the fact that the powers that be (in the USA and quite a few other countries), were established by rebellions? If God raises up kings and setteth them down, then we MUST make room in our theology for the fact that God at times may proclaim that a certain government's time is over and ORDAIN rebellion against it.

In the Old Testament times, Jewish law held that a rebellion was justified if it had prophetic sanction -- and to name just 2 examples, the US rebellion against Britain and the Mexican rebellion against Spain were both supported from the pulpit.

174 posted on 05/25/2004 10:40:43 AM PDT by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: BSunday
Nobody is forcing you to agree with anything. If you don't like what is being taught in schools, then either be more active, use the legislative process, or homeschool

Activism has failed, legislative process has failed, and not everyone can afford to homeschool. (We can, but many can't.)

Nobody is forcing you to agree with anything.

The future is Canada. US liberals are ecstatic over the fact that it's now actually illegal to proclaim "homosexuality is a sin". They're very close to doing that here under the guise of "hate speech".

175 posted on 05/25/2004 10:44:52 AM PDT by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

Impeachment would have been better.


176 posted on 05/25/2004 10:56:45 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
Well, darn! That makes two (2) states that are going to have to succeed from the Union, One for the Libertarians in the cold frozen North East and one for the Christians in the warm sandy South East. Could Start a fad.
163 -wingnut-


______________________________________


The libertarian free state project wants to force the feds to acknowledge/respect individual rights & a states constitutional powers ~within~ the union.

This 'Christian' state would apparently have state powers infringe upon individual freedoms. -- Big difference..
177 posted on 05/25/2004 11:03:11 AM PDT by tpaine ("The line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being." -- Solzhenitsyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Until you get to Heaven, there's always the Upper Peninsula of Michigan . . .


178 posted on 05/25/2004 11:13:20 AM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Rytwyng

Move to Missisippi or Alabama? Is this before or after tort reform?

Move to South Carolina? Is this before or after Lou Holtz?

Anyway, seems like I recall Nehemiah being willing to go back to the ruins of Jerusalem to rebuild the walls. I guess he thought relocating Judiasm to a nice peaceful spot in Persia wasn't much of an option.


179 posted on 05/25/2004 11:23:53 AM PDT by JusPasenThru (42 muscles to frown, 17 muscles to smile, but 0 muscles just to sit there and look dumb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoHebrew; tame; yall
This is silly. If very religious Christians don't want to associate with lefty secularists, there are far less extreme methods than seccession. For example, a Christian developer could form a private religious town.

Some condo type planned communities, where ALL property is owned by the association, [save the inside of the residence], have this type of political control built in. - Non-conforming residents can be evicted & their property rights bought back by the association.
The majority rules in these communitarian communities.

Federal anti-discrimination laws would probably prevent de jure discrimination against secularists, but if a developer says "This town of 5,000 people is for God-fearing Christians. Our police will enforce strict blue laws, morality codes etc." I highly doubt non-Christians would choose to live in that town.

Such associations cannot have 'police'. A security force, sure, but a county sheriff would have to be in control of criminal law enforcement. The only real police power a condo association has is banishment.

Once secluded in such a town, would it really matter if the state the town was located in permitted abortion or pornography or homosexual marriage... 50 miles away?? I highly doubt it would impact residents of such a town, or their children, at all.

Exactly. If abortion was against asso. rules, the woman involved could be evicted. -- IE, literally 'thrown out of town'.

Orthodox Jews and the Amish have been doing this for decades -- look at towns such as Monsey or Kiryas Joel in New York, for example. There's no reason Christians couldn't do the same.

Yep, as long as all the rules were clearly disclosed, and everyone legally agreed to abide by them, such a totalitarian 'town' would be legal, imo.

{It could also be a hell on earth.}

180 posted on 05/25/2004 11:35:51 AM PDT by tpaine ("The line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being." -- Solzhenitsyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-354 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson