To: sathers
You'll never hear a word of this on the networks, trust me...
5 posted on
05/27/2004 7:38:00 AM PDT by
cspackler
(There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
To: cspackler
You got that right. How much have they played up the Sarin?
Bush's big chance will be at the debates when he points out what the media won't talk about.
10 posted on
05/27/2004 7:38:58 AM PDT by
dyed_in_the_wool
(Why do Al Qaeda and DNC press releases always sound the same?)
To: cspackler
You'll never hear a word of this on the networks, trust me... Yup I agree.
23 posted on
05/27/2004 7:42:45 AM PDT by
areafiftyone
(Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
To: cspackler
You'll never hear a word of this on the networks, trust me...My thoughts exactly ... FOX will carry it, no one else.
42 posted on
05/27/2004 7:51:28 AM PDT by
BluH2o
To: cspackler
but imagine if you did. Imagine a sixty-minutes segment covering this. Imagine congressional hearings with republican committee members banging their fists on the podium while they demand to know all the answers... who can make this happen??? GEORGE W. BUSH (and Rove, etc.) Let's ROLLLLLL!
To: cspackler
Not if left up to their own devices. To use a war analogy, specifically maneuver warfare, you avoid pockets of resistance, by passing them and flowing through paths of least resistance to your objective.
The objective here is public perception, the perception that they were lied to, or that Bush and Co. went to war on bad/false intelligence. Both of these points are lies, which must be supported by a constant flow of misinformation. We must change public perception.
The major mainstream press are the pockets of resistance. Thanks to fox, talk radio, and the Internet we can flow information past the mainstream press like "water around rocks". Dump the information in the laps of the 20% undecided and in the 40% Bush Haters. Post these things all over the web, write letters to the editor, lean on fox broadcasting to air these stories. We need a media blitzkreig, and this time, no stopping at Stalingrad.
Also, disheartening the Bush Haters is as good as getting a swing voter off the fence.
94 posted on
05/27/2004 8:51:43 AM PDT by
Dead Dog
To: cspackler
If you search all the major news sites, you will find there are plenty of stories that these same news agencies ran that proved the Iraq - al Qaeda connection. A lot of these stories appeared in 1998-2001.
The media also provided a host of Iraq - al Qaeda connection stories after 9/11.
These stories make interesting reading.
It would appear Anne Coulter is right ... "The beauty of being a liberal is that history always begins this morning. Every day liberals can create a new narrative that destroys the past as it occurred."
113 posted on
05/27/2004 10:34:08 AM PDT by
snooker
(John Flipping Kerry, the enemy's choice in Vietnam, the enemy's choice in Iraq.)
To: cspackler
To: cspackler
You'll never hear a word of this on the networks, trust me...
Because Sadly Bush has never said this. In fact he was forced to say publicly there was NO connection with Saddam and al-Qaeda/9/11. The Lefties at airamerica radio play that clip over and over of Bush saying this. What is wrong with Bush anyway that such news is not shouted from the highest mountain top?
184 posted on
05/28/2004 3:56:12 PM PDT by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson