They are despicable.This might be a good time to post this .....
Posted on 05/28/2004 7:14:34 AM PDT by jmstein7
ping
Bump!
An example ... back during the run up to the '96 election the NY Times did a piece on . This was on the front page of the weekend editorial section above the fold a large picture of Dole exercising on a treadmill. The picture took over half the right side of the page, extending down below the fold. The accompanying article on Dole was to the left of the picture. Immediately below the picture in bold caps a unrelated article titled "Making A Case for Death" about the tobacco industry. This is a classic example of subliminal messaging the NY Times uses frequently (in addition to the more overt) to convey their leftist liberal agenda.
The importance of this is the syndication of NYT articles..They also are a "source " for TV...Their influence is world and nationwide...They have clout and use it to advance their agenda...
They have a right and we have a right to condemn them for being an arm of the DNC just like the networks are..They harm our country and our mission. They endanger us..I despise their agenda and their overt sabatoge of this nation's well being.
They are despicable.This might be a good time to post this .....
Good to have a laugh at their expense!
You did well. Send thanks to your source.Now lets see if the NY Times has the courage to publish the transcript from that Editorial Board meeting.
If they refuse to publicize that meeting in particular, then they've got something to hide.
How many pictures have you seen in print of the victims of 9-11?
How many pictures have you seen in print of Saddam's tortures?
How many pictures have you seen in print of atrocities against American soldiers ( shot in the back after being handcuffed, naked?)
How many picures have you seen of the beheaded and dismembered american civilians?
Total these up. Compare with # of pictures you've seen of Abu Ghraib. Now what does that tell you?
Great Work! I disagree with some here who think you have revealed the obvious. Revealing that they were unknowingly biased is not news. Revealing that they are KNOWINGLY biased is Jason Blair stuff.
Big surprise there.
BTTT. The Times is evil.
However, what I don't believe the dems/libs realize is that this "overkill" of bashing Bush is beginning to backfire. I was watching Dayside on Monday - they had Rich Lowry and some gal (first name is Ellen), and she tried to make some excuse about Kerry's "training wheels" comment re the President's fall off his bike. When she started talking about it, the audience began booing - loudly.
The dems/libs don't think their message is getting out (thus the constant harping and shrill grandstanding) .. when in reality .. IT GOT OUT AND PEOPLE DON'T LIKE IT.
The other comment I have heard is that the MEDIA doesn't trust the "people's" perception of things. Which is doublespeak for WE'RE TOO STUPID TO KNOW WHAT's BEST FOR US.
I still say the "silent majority" will strike again on election day and put the dems in their place - LOSERS!
I like the idea! And, I'll do you one better... they should release all the minutes of their meetings since the war started. As you say -- if they have nothing to hide, then there shouldn't be a problem.
bump
Times trying to oust Bush? NO WAY!!!! What's next, Ted Kennedy is going to drink a lot and drive a woman off a bridge? Oh wait, that already happened.
Do I smell a media bias protest? We have time on the weekends...that is a HINT
Give me a call, and we can ask people about options...and if anyone else knows of options, Freep mail me!
The New York Times is at war with liars, and those who sold them lies. And they're not the only ones. It's going to get real ugly, real fast! Don't miss this fight.
If this can be confirmed, the New York Times should lose the privilege to operate and should be shut down. ANY orchestrated attempt by the media to interfere with politics should be stopped, no matter which party is in power. It is time.
This guy, Jeremiah Jr, is the most Anti-Bush Sleeper Troll on FR.
He "hides" -- or tries to hide -- his malice for Bush and the GOP behind tepid support for Rudy Giuliani:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/site/user-posts?id=19620
Otherwise, this guy is a Michael Moore-loving, anti-Conservative conspiracist, and feel free to flame the heck out of him until he is kicked off out of pity.
This guy has been allowed to stay here for too long -- 1999 -- and it's time for him to go.
This election is too important to allow disruptors -- it's time to crack down on sleeper trolls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
