Skip to comments.Confirmed! The New York Times is ACTUALLY Plotting to Oust Bush! (actual, first-hand source)
Posted on 05/28/2004 7:14:34 AM PDT by jmstein7
Confirmed! The New York Times is ACTUALLY Plotting to Oust Bush!
Where to begin? I just got an interesting call from a buddy (a listening post) who works at the Times -- I will keep the name out of this, because I don't to be responsible for someone losing their job.
Anyway, the person is a lurker on FR, and, this morning,
read this activism item I posted last night. We spoke for a few minutes this morning.
Apparently, Bill O'Reilly had a segment on his show last night where he accused the New York Times of having an agenda to oust Bush -- for example, they have had the Prisoner Abuse story on the front page of the Times for 28 days in a row, even though there has been no news for 10 days (even to the point of relegating the story about the seven terror suspects to the middle pages of the paper).
There was an editors' meeting at the Times this morning. The O'Reilly piece was a subject of conversation. But, during the discussion, one of the editors actually said that they would have to alter their "strategy" to be less overt and draw less public criticism from the likes of O'Reilly!
The editor didn't say specifically that there was a "strategy" to oust Bush, but the editor did imply that there is some sort of strategy "at play" in the Editorial board at the Times. This is the first time I've heard actual proof of a coordinated effort there to actually campaign against the President and damage him.
So, there you have it -- the New York Times is actually at war with the Bush administration.
I will post more info as I get it.
I just PM's you with an idea.
Well, it's not like it was a big secret.
It is obvious that is exactly what many media types are angling for.
This is frontpage news? ;)
Whoda thunkit!!! ;)
I really hate the NYT. In my world view, they attack my values. In times of war, they attack my president. They are the enemy.
1. The TImes has an anti-Bush agenda
2. water is wet
3. The Pope is Catholic
4. A bear s**ts in the woods.
Seriously..your posts are outstanding...you'e doing yeoman work..keep it up..
Even without this evidence, we knew it. It was as obvious as how the LA Times campaigned against Schwarzenegger.
Isn't it just nice to know that we weren't just wearing tinfoil hats all along?
I saw O'Reilly's expose last night (that the Times had run 28 straight days of front-page stories on Abu Gharib). I thought, "heck, the Times won't care".
It's almost a relief to read that they are very sensitive about how they're portrayed by people like O'Reilly.
They are at war with AMERICA! They are TRAITORS! The "Fourth Estate" is really a "Fifth Column."
Buffalo Ping !
The owners, publisher, editors and staff at the NYTimes are more mentally ill than Algore!
Even without this evidence,
Did you also know that John Kerry served in Vietnam?
In the EDITORIAL BOARD.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.