Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Confirmed! The New York Times is ACTUALLY Plotting to Oust Bush! (actual, first-hand source)
5-18-04

Posted on 05/28/2004 7:14:34 AM PDT by jmstein7

Confirmed!  The New York Times is ACTUALLY Plotting to Oust Bush!

Where to begin?  I just got an interesting call from a buddy (a listening post) who works at the Times -- I will keep the name out of this, because I don't to be responsible for someone losing their job.

Anyway, the person is a lurker on FR, and, this morning,

read this activism item I posted last night.  We spoke for a few minutes this morning.

Apparently, Bill O'Reilly had a segment on his show last night where he accused the New York Times of having an agenda to oust Bush -- for example, they have had the Prisoner Abuse story on the front page of the Times for 28 days in a row, even though there has been no news for 10 days (even to the point of relegating the story about the seven terror suspects to the middle pages of the paper).

There was an editors' meeting at the Times this morning.  The O'Reilly piece was a subject of conversation.  But, during the discussion, one of the editors actually said that they would have to alter their "strategy" to be less overt and draw less public criticism from the likes of O'Reilly! 

The editor didn't say specifically that there was a "strategy" to oust Bush, but the editor did imply that there is some sort of strategy "at play" in the Editorial board at the Times.  This is the first time I've heard actual proof of a coordinated effort there to actually campaign against the President and damage him.

So, there you have it -- the New York Times is actually at war with the Bush administration.

I will post more info as I get it.


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: liberalmedia; nyt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-142 next last
I have incorporated all your presentation suggestions. Thanks.
1 posted on 05/28/2004 7:14:36 AM PDT by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

I just PM's you with an idea.


2 posted on 05/28/2004 7:16:10 AM PDT by God luvs America (Support Our Troops....Don't vote for Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lead Moderator

Better?


3 posted on 05/28/2004 7:16:18 AM PDT by jmstein7 (Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

I saw.


4 posted on 05/28/2004 7:16:33 AM PDT by jmstein7 (Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

BTTT!


5 posted on 05/28/2004 7:17:34 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Well, it's not like it was a big secret.

It is obvious that is exactly what many media types are angling for.


6 posted on 05/28/2004 7:17:39 AM PDT by cyncooper (There's a RAT line in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

This is frontpage news? ;)

Whoda thunkit!!! ;)

good scoop.


7 posted on 05/28/2004 7:18:53 AM PDT by adam_az (Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7; StriperSniper; Mo1; Peach; Howlin; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...

Pinggggggggggggggggggggggg.................


8 posted on 05/28/2004 7:19:40 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Thanks for the confirmation, but the strategy was obvious.

I really hate the NYT. In my world view, they attack my values. In times of war, they attack my president. They are the enemy.

9 posted on 05/28/2004 7:20:11 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Let's see..

1. The TImes has an anti-Bush agenda
2. water is wet
3. The Pope is Catholic
4. A bear s**ts in the woods.

Seriously..your posts are outstanding...you'e doing yeoman work..keep it up..

10 posted on 05/28/2004 7:20:12 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

Even without this evidence, we knew it. It was as obvious as how the LA Times campaigned against Schwarzenegger.


11 posted on 05/28/2004 7:20:28 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

Isn't it just nice to know that we weren't just wearing tinfoil hats all along?


12 posted on 05/28/2004 7:21:03 AM PDT by jmstein7 (Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

I saw O'Reilly's expose last night (that the Times had run 28 straight days of front-page stories on Abu Gharib). I thought, "heck, the Times won't care".

It's almost a relief to read that they are very sensitive about how they're portrayed by people like O'Reilly.


13 posted on 05/28/2004 7:21:54 AM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
So, there you have it -- the New York Times is actually at war with the Bush administration.

They are at war with AMERICA! They are TRAITORS! The "Fourth Estate" is really a "Fifth Column."

14 posted on 05/28/2004 7:22:20 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7; BfloGuy; Bob Eimiller; bc2; bauerle; brownie; birdsman; Bonneville; commish; crosdaddy; ..

Buffalo Ping !

Looks better....


15 posted on 05/28/2004 7:22:23 AM PDT by The Mayor (Behold, He is coming with clouds, and every eye will see Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
It's not just that the NYTimes has a plan to oust Bush, they appear to have a plan to put Osama Bin Laden in a position of world power.

The owners, publisher, editors and staff at the NYTimes are more mentally ill than Algore!

16 posted on 05/28/2004 7:23:17 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Dog Gone

Even without this evidence,



?


18 posted on 05/28/2004 7:23:31 AM PDT by deport (To a dog all roads lead home.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
The Times wants to oust Bush?

Did you also know that John Kerry served in Vietnam?

19 posted on 05/28/2004 7:23:49 AM PDT by wi jd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

In the EDITORIAL BOARD.


20 posted on 05/28/2004 7:23:57 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (Must get moose and squirrel ... B. Badanov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Isn't it just nice to know that we weren't just wearing tinfoil hats all along?

Precisely. And well done.

21 posted on 05/28/2004 7:24:17 AM PDT by Petronski (They could choose between shame and war: Some chose shame, but got war anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Isn't it just nice to know that we weren't just wearing tinfoil hats all along?

Speak for yourself, bucko...


22 posted on 05/28/2004 7:24:21 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

This is a surprise how ?


23 posted on 05/28/2004 7:24:24 AM PDT by UB355
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

It was former City-of-Evil resident Ann Coulter who said Timothy McVeigh erred in taking out an obscure federal building in OKC, and not a Certain Broadsheet based on West 43rd Street in NYC.


24 posted on 05/28/2004 7:24:46 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Don't blame me. I voted for Sharpton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

I wonder if Jim Robinson would object to having the headline "NY Times Plots to Oust Bush" at the top of "Frontpage News" 28 times even though there isn't any news?


25 posted on 05/28/2004 7:26:57 AM PDT by hispanarepublicana (Mr. Fox, give us our water!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

It's not just the American press, it's a global effort ...btw do you remember when Hildebeast summoned them a couple of months ago to got after Bush?


26 posted on 05/28/2004 7:27:05 AM PDT by hope (How far will your passion take you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
I HATE THE NEW YORK SLIMES!!!!!
27 posted on 05/28/2004 7:27:24 AM PDT by ride the whirlwind (Kerry wants to be the leader of the free world. Free for how long? - Zell Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Wow, you have a mole at the Old Gay Lady? That's too cool. Hope the guy doesn't get outed. Maybe he can write an insider expose' some day.


28 posted on 05/28/2004 7:27:40 AM PDT by jpl ("You can go to a restaurant in New York City and meet a foreign leader."- John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
I saw the O'reilly report. I had hoped he would post those figures on his website, but I haven't seen them there.

He said the NYTimes has run more on the Iraqi prison scandal than any other subject since Watergate. He also mentioned that the LA Times has overblown coverage with many front pages, but not quite as many as the NYTimes.

Either Hannity or O'reilly was interviewing a dem-spinner. The question posed was 'since the media (broadcast and print) are still running the prison scandal as front page, what new information has been given in the last 10 days?'

The dem-spinner responded, "none."
29 posted on 05/28/2004 7:27:46 AM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Have you emailed O'Reilly with this info? Maybe see if your source would be willing to talk with him.


30 posted on 05/28/2004 7:28:25 AM PDT by Tree of Liberty (Shop smart. Shop S-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
The Newspaper Association of America's own research predicts that by the end of this decade less than 9% of Americans under the age of 35 will read a daily newspaper.

The NYT power base is drastically shifting, let them have a last hurrah because as sure as eggs is eggs there will be no government bail out.

31 posted on 05/28/2004 7:29:41 AM PDT by ijcr (Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Better!


32 posted on 05/28/2004 7:30:08 AM PDT by Lead Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
have a plan to put Osama Bin Laden in a position of world power

The NYT plans to install a necrocracy!

33 posted on 05/28/2004 7:30:15 AM PDT by ThanhPhero (Ong lam hanh huong di La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wi jd

Newsflash! I just learned that water is wet, and the surface of the sun is really hot.


34 posted on 05/28/2004 7:30:23 AM PDT by Hat-Trick (Do you trust a government that does not trust you with guns?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
The Gospel According to the New York Times: How the World's Most Powerful News Organization Shapes Your Mind and Values by William Proctor

A MUST READ!

35 posted on 05/28/2004 7:31:49 AM PDT by TrueBeliever9 (Life is uncertain. Ride your best horse first. Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
And now for this additional breaking news! The sky is blue!

Film at 11!

36 posted on 05/28/2004 7:32:27 AM PDT by mhking ("Enterprise" finale: Yeah, we saved Earth, but I hate Illinois Nazis...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
>The New York Times is ACTUALLY Plotting to Oust Bush!
Washington's Civil War

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is how we fight
our civil wars in the West . . .
Businesses take sides,

foundations take sides,
blocs in the military
take sides. Then hot wars

blow up overseas,
and domestically the fights
are media shows

and legal wrangling.
Sooner or later, I bet,
the overt action

will pick-up state-side.
(Assuming the terror stuff
isn't some player

upping the ante
already with domestic
violence and bloodshed . . .)

37 posted on 05/28/2004 7:32:36 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Why is everyone so concerned with having proof that MOST of the media are NeoMarxists?

Who you going to convince? Other NeoMarxists?


38 posted on 05/28/2004 7:33:01 AM PDT by Peter J. Huss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

"the New York Times is actually at war with the Bush administration"

It is also time that the public realizes the information they get is as filtered as that given to the people of the Middle East, Red China, North Korea, Cuba, etc. Whether the people are liberals or conservatives they need to question what they read and fear those providing the information and ask themselves WHY? The war is not only with the Bush administration but with anyone who does not comply. Interesting how media is overtly flexing their muscles, is it a test?


39 posted on 05/28/2004 7:33:46 AM PDT by Toespi (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Anyway, the person is a lurker on FR

Dear, "Lurker" :
If you're reading this thread, please consider being a whistleblower over this. I'm not demanding you do this, just consider the fact that these people are in the process of destroying America;
---which would also lead to unemployment if they succeed.

Just my $0.02.
40 posted on 05/28/2004 7:36:18 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">miserable failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking; Poohbah; rdb3; section9; Howlin; Long Cut; Pukin Dog

This is big... it pretty much affects what folks see on the nightly news from ABC, CBS, and NBC.

Some folks need to hit this hard and fast.


41 posted on 05/28/2004 7:37:09 AM PDT by hchutch ("Go ahead. Leave early and beat the traffic. The Milwaukee Brewers dare you." - MLB.com 5/11/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
NPR does much more damage to Bush every day and it is taxpayer funded !!


BUMP

42 posted on 05/28/2004 7:37:43 AM PDT by tm22721 (May the UN rest in peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
P.S.
Forget O'Reilly. Send this to Rush.
43 posted on 05/28/2004 7:39:26 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">miserable failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
(even to the point of relegating the story about the seven terror suspects to the middle pages of the paper).

And the NY Slimes still couldn't resist bashing our President. If I recall correctly, the headline for the page 17 article was something like "Ashcroft Warns Of New Terrorist Threads, But Some Claim Threat Is Overstated." Also, Of the eight front page articles yesterday, six involved our President and all were negative.

44 posted on 05/28/2004 7:39:41 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Man bites dog! That would be news!
45 posted on 05/28/2004 7:40:47 AM PDT by austinite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Some folks need to hit this hard and fast.

60 Minutes?

46 posted on 05/28/2004 7:44:11 AM PDT by gilliam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Unfortunately, there is proof everyday....I didn't need your "LP" to confirm it.

Not meaning to rain on your parade....but I don't think one has to be a mental giant to understand that the U.S. Clymer lamestreamers are DemoLeftistMarxistSocialistLyingLibs to the core....

FRegards,

47 posted on 05/28/2004 7:44:13 AM PDT by Osage Orange (STOP REPEAT OFFENDERS..!! DON'T RE-ELECT THEM..!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7; MeekOneGOP

BTTT

Meek - GI Ping...


48 posted on 05/28/2004 7:45:01 AM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Aside from the overarching evil that is the Times, I see nothing evil here. The Founders intended that a free press would have many "agendas" and their Bill of Rights was written to insure just this type of ability. Of course, it is Bill O's right to expose them for it under that same constitutional amendment's provisions. We become aware and respond accordingly. God's in his heaven, all's right with the fourth estate.

This does not take away from the fact that the NYT is a filthy, lying, traitorous piece of S#/T!
49 posted on 05/28/2004 7:46:50 AM PDT by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax; kattracks

I think you will find this interesting.


50 posted on 05/28/2004 7:47:14 AM PDT by jmstein7 (Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson