Confirmed! The New York Times is ACTUALLY Plotting to Oust Bush! (actual, first-hand source)

5-18-04

[jmstein7]

Confirmed!  The New York Times is ACTUALLY Plotting to Oust Bush!

Where to begin?  I just got an interesting call from a buddy (a listening post) who works at the Times -- I will keep the name out of this, because I don't to be responsible for someone losing their job.

Anyway, the person is a lurker on FR, and, this morning,

read this activism item I posted last night.  We spoke for a few minutes this morning.

Apparently, Bill O'Reilly had a segment on his show last night where he accused the New York Times of having an agenda to oust Bush -- for example, they have had the Prisoner Abuse story on the front page of the Times for 28 days in a row, even though there has been no news for 10 days (even to the point of relegating the story about the seven terror suspects to the middle pages of the paper).

There was an editors' meeting at the Times this morning.  The O'Reilly piece was a subject of conversation.  But, during the discussion, one of the editors actually said that they would have to alter their "strategy" to be less overt and draw less public criticism from the likes of O'Reilly! 

The editor didn't say specifically that there was a "strategy" to oust Bush, but the editor did imply that there is some sort of strategy "at play" in the Editorial board at the Times.  This is the first time I've heard actual proof of a coordinated effort there to actually campaign against the President and damage him.

So, there you have it -- the New York Times is actually at war with the Bush administration.

I will post more info as I get it.

[jmstein7]

I have incorporated all your presentation suggestions. Thanks.

[God luvs America]

I just PM's you with an idea.

[jmstein7]

Better?

[jmstein7]

I saw.

[Constitution Day]

BTTT!

[cyncooper]

Well, it's not like it was a big secret.

It is obvious that is exactly what many media types are angling for.

[adam_az]

This is frontpage news? ;)

Whoda thunkit!!! ;)

good scoop.

[OXENinFLA]

Pinggggggggggggggggggggggg.................

[GBA]

Thanks for the confirmation, but the strategy was obvious.

I really hate the NYT. In my world view, they attack my values. In times of war, they attack my president. They are the enemy.

[ken5050]

Let's see..

1. The TImes has an anti-Bush agenda
2. water is wet
3. The Pope is Catholic
4. A bear s**ts in the woods.

Seriously..your posts are outstanding...you'e doing yeoman work..keep it up..

[Dog Gone]

Even without this evidence, we knew it. It was as obvious as how the LA Times campaigned against Schwarzenegger.

[jmstein7]

Isn't it just nice to know that we weren't just wearing tinfoil hats all along?

[Numbers Guy]

I saw O'Reilly's expose last night (that the Times had run 28 straight days of front-page stories on Abu Gharib). I thought, "heck, the Times won't care".

It's almost a relief to read that they are very sensitive about how they're portrayed by people like O'Reilly.

[Don Corleone]

So, there you have it -- the New York Times is actually at war with the Bush administration.

They are at war with AMERICA! They are TRAITORS! The "Fourth Estate" is really a "Fifth Column."

[The Mayor]

Buffalo Ping !

Looks better....

[muawiyah]

It's not just that the NYTimes has a plan to oust Bush, they appear to have a plan to put Osama Bin Laden in a position of world power.

The owners, publisher, editors and staff at the NYTimes are more mentally ill than Algore!

[deport]

Even without this evidence,

---

?

[wi jd]

The Times wants to oust Bush?

Did you also know that John Kerry served in Vietnam?

[BunnySlippers]

In the EDITORIAL BOARD.

[Petronski]

Isn't it just nice to know that we weren't just wearing tinfoil hats all along?

Precisely. And well done.

[Constitution Day]

Isn't it just nice to know that we weren't just wearing tinfoil hats all along?

Speak for yourself, bucko...

[UB355]

This is a surprise how ?

[NativeNewYorker]

It was former City-of-Evil resident Ann Coulter who said Timothy McVeigh erred in taking out an obscure federal building in OKC, and not a Certain Broadsheet based on West 43rd Street in NYC.

[hispanarepublicana]

I wonder if Jim Robinson would object to having the headline "NY Times Plots to Oust Bush" at the top of "Frontpage News" 28 times even though there isn't any news?

[hope]

It's not just the American press, it's a global effort ...btw do you remember when Hildebeast summoned them a couple of months ago to got after Bush?

[ride the whirlwind]

I HATE THE NEW YORK SLIMES!!!!!

[jpl]

Wow, you have a mole at the Old Gay Lady? That's too cool. Hope the guy doesn't get outed. Maybe he can write an insider expose' some day.

[TomGuy]

I saw the O'reilly report. I had hoped he would post those figures on his website, but I haven't seen them there.

He said the NYTimes has run more on the Iraqi prison scandal than any other subject since Watergate. He also mentioned that the LA Times has overblown coverage with many front pages, but not quite as many as the NYTimes.

Either Hannity or O'reilly was interviewing a dem-spinner. The question posed was 'since the media (broadcast and print) are still running the prison scandal as front page, what new information has been given in the last 10 days?'

The dem-spinner responded, "none."

[Tree of Liberty]

Have you emailed O'Reilly with this info? Maybe see if your source would be willing to talk with him.

[ijcr]

The Newspaper Association of America's own research predicts that by the end of this decade less than 9% of Americans under the age of 35 will read a daily newspaper.

The NYT power base is drastically shifting, let them have a last hurrah because as sure as eggs is eggs there will be no government bail out.

[Lead Moderator]

Better!

[ThanhPhero]

have a plan to put Osama Bin Laden in a position of world power

The NYT plans to install a necrocracy!

[Hat-Trick]

Newsflash! I just learned that water is wet, and the surface of the sun is really hot.

[TrueBeliever9]

The Gospel According to the New York Times: How the World's Most Powerful News Organization Shapes Your Mind and Values by William Proctor

A MUST READ!

[mhking]

And now for this additional breaking news! The sky is blue!

Film at 11!

[theFIRMbss]

>The New York Times is ACTUALLY Plotting to Oust Bush!

Washington's Civil War

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is how we fight
our civil wars in the West . . .
Businesses take sides,

foundations take sides,
blocs in the military
take sides. Then hot wars

blow up overseas,
and domestically the fights
are media shows

and legal wrangling.
Sooner or later, I bet,
the overt action

will pick-up state-side.
(Assuming the terror stuff
isn't some player

upping the ante
already with domestic
violence and bloodshed . . .)

[Peter J. Huss]

Why is everyone so concerned with having proof that MOST of the media are NeoMarxists?

Who you going to convince? Other NeoMarxists?

[Toespi]

"the New York Times is actually at war with the Bush administration"

It is also time that the public realizes the information they get is as filtered as that given to the people of the Middle East, Red China, North Korea, Cuba, etc. Whether the people are liberals or conservatives they need to question what they read and fear those providing the information and ask themselves WHY? The war is not only with the Bush administration but with anyone who does not comply. Interesting how media is overtly flexing their muscles, is it a test?

[RandallFlagg]

Anyway, the person is a lurker on FR

Dear, "Lurker" :
If you're reading this thread, please consider being a whistleblower over this. I'm not demanding you do this, just consider the fact that these people are in the process of destroying America;
---which would also lead to unemployment if they succeed.

Just my $0.02.

[hchutch]

This is big... it pretty much affects what folks see on the nightly news from ABC, CBS, and NBC.

Some folks need to hit this hard and fast.

[tm22721]

NPR does much more damage to Bush every day and it is taxpayer funded !!

BUMP

[RandallFlagg]

P.S.
Forget O'Reilly. Send this to Rush.

[Labyrinthos]

(even to the point of relegating the story about the seven terror suspects to the middle pages of the paper).

And the NY Slimes still couldn't resist bashing our President. If I recall correctly, the headline for the page 17 article was something like "Ashcroft Warns Of New Terrorist Threads, But Some Claim Threat Is Overstated." Also, Of the eight front page articles yesterday, six involved our President and all were negative.

[austinite]

Man bites dog! That would be news!

[gilliam]

Some folks need to hit this hard and fast.

60 Minutes?

[Osage Orange]

Unfortunately, there is proof everyday....I didn't need your "LP" to confirm it.

Not meaning to rain on your parade....but I don't think one has to be a mental giant to understand that the U.S. Clymer lamestreamers are DemoLeftistMarxistSocialistLyingLibs to the core....

FRegards,

[EdReform]

BTTT

Meek - GI Ping...

[cartoonistx]

Aside from the overarching evil that is the Times, I see nothing evil here. The Founders intended that a free press would have many "agendas" and their Bill of Rights was written to insure just this type of ability. Of course, it is Bill O's right to expose them for it under that same constitutional amendment's provisions. We become aware and respond accordingly. God's in his heaven, all's right with the fourth estate.

This does not take away from the fact that the NYT is a filthy, lying, traitorous piece of S#/T!

[jmstein7]

I think you will find this interesting.