Skip to comments.
Group tries to prevent gay Catholics from taking communion
http://www.grandforks.com ^
| May. 30, 2004
| ELIZABETH DUNBAR
Posted on 05/30/2004 3:21:39 PM PDT by miltonim
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: miltonim
In a written statement, the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis said that while only baptized Catholics should take Holy Communion, "the determination of a person's spiritual readiness rests with the individual conscience and honesty of individual worshippers."That's a selective and dishonest quotation. The Archdiocesan statement said that only baptized Catholics in the state of grace should receive Communion. Its statement made very clear that the sash wearers should NOT receive Communion, while still saying that no one would be denied Communion.
To: NYer
An active homosexual who presents him (or her) self for the Sacrament of Confession, MUST acknowledge their awareness of sinfulness and GIVE UP their active homosexual lifestyle Bingo! Jesus said "Go and sin no more", not "Go and just make sure you confess each and every time you sin in the future".
42
posted on
05/30/2004 5:21:45 PM PDT
by
AmericaUnited
(It's time someone says the emperor has no clothes.)
To: miltonim
"We don't know what's in someone's heart".
Is a sash not enough? Do they need them to come up to communion holding hands? Or what if they had this sign on the armband:
Or this:
I am sure this "priest" would welcome them too!
43
posted on
05/30/2004 5:25:13 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
("Stating the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men." George Orwell)
To: NYer
And that is where you would be wrong! An active homosexual who presents him (or her) self for the Sacrament of Confession, MUST acknowledge their awareness of sinfulness and GIVE UP their active homosexual lifestyle. He said it about "CELIBATE" person. It implies giving up active homosexual lifestyle.
44
posted on
05/30/2004 5:32:08 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
("Stating the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men." George Orwell)
To: sweetliberty
What about the verse right before?
"Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord."
1 Cor 11:27
I'm pretty certain that being a practicing homosexual and taking Communion is taking it in an "unworthy manner."
45
posted on
05/30/2004 5:34:43 PM PDT
by
BabyRepub
(The best defense is a good offense.)
To: A. Pole
Or a hood, instead of a sash?
46
posted on
05/30/2004 5:40:47 PM PDT
by
miltonim
(Fight those who do not believe in Allah. - Koran, Surah IX: 29)
To: Integrityrocks
"So, why do they even want to be Catholic?"
IMO, they are under the direct influence of Satan to a degree that would horrify us all if it became visible, and he is using them to attack the Church.
47
posted on
05/30/2004 5:41:50 PM PDT
by
dsc
(The Crusades were the first wars on terrorism.)
To: BabyRepub
"I'm pretty certain that being a practicing homosexual and taking Communion is taking it in an "unworthy manner." What they want is for us to say that sin isn't sin. They mock the church and they mock the Lord. The militant homosexuals are agents of Satan, those whom God has given over to a reprobate mind.
48
posted on
05/30/2004 5:48:28 PM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.")
To: A. Pole
How about wearing a dynamite hash, and holding hands?
49
posted on
05/30/2004 5:48:54 PM PDT
by
miltonim
(Fight those who do not believe in Allah. - Koran, Surah IX: 29)
To: miltonim
50
posted on
05/30/2004 5:50:08 PM PDT
by
miltonim
(Fight those who do not believe in Allah. - Koran, Surah IX: 29)
To: dsc
IMO, they are under the direct influence of Satan to a degree that would horrify us all if it became visible, and he is using them to attack the Church It is not possible for someone to be a practicing gay and a true Catholic. What most don't seem to understand is Catholicism (for the most part) is not a cafeteia religion -- you don't get to pick and choose which parts you will adhere to.
Homosexual relations are a Sin. Promoting them is promoting Sin (which is yet another sin).
This is 0% theological and 100% political.
51
posted on
05/30/2004 5:50:47 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(This is a tag: </> This is a Line ---------)
To: sweetliberty
I know. I forgot the /sarcasm. : P
52
posted on
05/30/2004 5:54:12 PM PDT
by
BabyRepub
(The best defense is a good offense.)
To: NYer
! An active homosexual who presents him (or her) self for the Sacrament of Confession, MUST acknowledge their awareness of sinfulness and GIVE UP their active homosexual lifestyle. I think I have to agree with you. Repentance means that you turn away from your sins, not just get cleansed for the moment doesn't it?
53
posted on
05/30/2004 6:18:18 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(The leftist media is the enemy within.)
Comment #54 Removed by Moderator
Comment #55 Removed by Moderator
To: seamole
Can. 212 §1 Christ's faithful, conscious of their own responsibility, are bound to show christian obedience to what the sacred Pastors, who represent Christ, declare as teachers of the faith and prescribe as rulers of the Church. Unless they are like Apostol Judas.
56
posted on
05/30/2004 6:55:28 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
("Stating the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men." George Orwell)
To: formercalifornian
You are right on. And I am not a theologian, but...
I think that a "sin against the Holy Spirit" is a sin such as that committed by the sash-wearers.
It is a hyper-sin, one that cannot be forgiven, according to the words of Jesus.
Why?
Not because God is unwilling to forgive the penitent, but, in such a case as this, the penitent refuses adamantly to consider the behavior sinful.
The gays think what they are doing is virtuous.
But militant homosexuality is a sin against the Holy Spirit.
57
posted on
05/30/2004 6:59:20 PM PDT
by
caddie
To: dsc
Yes, they are in fact, infiltrators, satanists at that.
And there's a lot of them, including clergy.
58
posted on
05/30/2004 7:00:35 PM PDT
by
caddie
To: seamole
Shame on the "Ushers of the Eucharist" for usurping the office of priest, disrupting a Mass and potentially violating the civil law. If the laymen were more vigilant the pederasts could not use priesthood as a cover.
59
posted on
05/30/2004 7:03:09 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
("Stating the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men." George Orwell)
To: Cicero
I agree with you here, and have seen it happening.
I married into a family of believers who were Christian Protestant, and I was and am a Catholic believer.
Events of the past 20 years (been married 18) have made it clear to us all that the 'right wings' of all Christian churches (The Church) are indeed becoming united.
As are the left wings of the various sects claiming to be christian.
I see it happening.
60
posted on
05/30/2004 7:03:47 PM PDT
by
caddie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson