[neverdem]

Isn't the "Clinton gun ban on semi-automatic firearms" the self-same "Assault Weapons Bill" that Bush has pledged to sign if it is renewed?

Not much of a 'choice' evidenced there, if you ask me, Wayne.

I'll worry about Bush once an identical version gets passed by the House. If it does, then Bush has to figure how many single issue voters won't vote for him because he signs it. I'll say he grows in office, and he changes his mind. We'll see.

[tpaine]

I'll worry about Bush once an identical version gets passed by the House. If it does, then Bush has to figure how many single issue voters won't vote for him because he signs it. I'll say he grows in office, and he changes his mind. We'll see.

I 'worry' about a man that lets his politics define his principles about out RKBA's. -- To me our RKBA's is an inalienable right, not to be infringed for ANY reason.
--- Obviously, Bush differs, as do you.
- To me, this is a direct violation of the oath of office, -- to protect & defend our Constitutional rights. It is as far from 'single issue politics' as you can get.

Have you ever pledged to 'protect & defend', neverdem?