Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Link to mistress revealed
Ledger Enquirer ^ | Posted on Tue, Jun. 22, 2004 | Jessie Seyfer

Posted on 06/23/2004 5:28:39 AM PDT by runningbear

Link to mistress revealed

Posted on Tue, Jun. 22, 2004

Link to mistress revealed

SHE SPENT NIGHT AT HOME OF LACI PETERSON'S FRIEND AROUND TIME SHE WENT PUBLIC

By JESSIE SEYFER

San Jose (Calif.) Mercury News

One of Laci Peterson's best friends testified Monday that Amber Frey stayed overnight at her home around the time Frey held a press conference to tell the world she had been Scott Peterson's mistress............

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JOKESTER SCOTT

JOKESTER SCOTT

By HOWARD BREUER

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 23, 2004 -- REDWOOD CITY, Calif. — Jurors at the Scott Peterson double-murder trial yesterday traveled back in time to Christmas morning 2002 — and watched as the "calm, cool, relaxed" suspect laughed as he told a detective about his missing wife's fastidiousness. With Detective Al Brocchini in the witness box, prosecutors played a DVD on a big screen that showed Peterson being interrogated at the Modesto police station 16 hours after he claimed he went fishing, leaving his eight-months pregnant wife, Laci, at home mopping floors.

"Why was your wife mopping the floors on [Christmas Eve] morning?" Brocchini asks Peterson on the recording.

Peterson leans back in his chair, chuckles and replies, "She was very meticulous about it, with it being Christmas and with the dogs and the cats in the house." Police later learned that the Petersons' housekeeper had mopped the floors the previous day.

Peterson was also seen snickering when Brocchini asked ........

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE PETERSON TRIAL

Jury shown video of cop quizzing suspect
Peterson was calm, emotionless, detective testifies

Diana Walsh and Stacy Finz, Chronicle Staff Writer

Wednesday, June 23, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scott Peterson appeared calm and emotionless even as a police detective grilled him on his whereabouts the day his wife disappeared and later when the detective accused him of having multiple extramarital affairs, according to testimony at his double-murder trial Tuesday.

Peterson sipped from a coffee cup, stuck his hands in his pockets, talked in a steady and calm voice and even joked about misfiring his gun, during the interview by Detective Al Brocchini at the Modesto Police Department. The interview, recorded by video camera and played for jurors Tuesday, took place just after midnight Dec. 25, 2002, six hours after Peterson reported his wife, Laci, missing.

Throughout the hourlong video, Peterson expresses little concern for his missing pregnant wife. He also appears unconcerned about questions relating to what he'd done and where he'd been earlier that day......

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Detective says Scott Peterson was 'relaxed'

Detective says Scott Peterson was 'relaxed'

Associated Press

REDWOOD CITY - Jurors heard yesterday for the first time Scott Peterson's own account of what he did the day his pregnant wife disappeared, and a detective's descriptions of a man seemingly void of emotions who never would be ruled out as a suspect........

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jurors hear Peterson's alibi in his own words through taped interview

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Excerpt) Read more at ledger-enquirer.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-398 next last
"In the most dramatic incident the detective related, Brocchini confronted Peterson in a school parking lot in Fresno, the hometown of his mistress. Brocchini told Peterson he had photos of him with "other girlfriends."

"I said, 'You got some explaining to do,'" Brocchini recalled of the Feb. 1, 2003, exchange. "I said he wasn't acting like somebody who was missing his pregnant wife."

He said Peterson was dismissive, saying "Right. Other girlfriends," and then walked away."

1 posted on 06/23/2004 5:28:39 AM PDT by runningbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rheo; Mystery Y; Searching4Justice; brneyedgirl; Scupoli; sissyjane; TexKat; Lanza; Mrs.Liberty; ...

PINGING.......


2 posted on 06/23/2004 5:29:18 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brneyedgirl; Texas Eagle; Scupoli; Lanza; Mrs.Liberty; muggs; Reaganwuzthebest; csvset; ...

PINGING.......


3 posted on 06/23/2004 5:29:51 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshe; Alissa; Tijeras_Slim; TXLady; zip; Faith65; fiesti; pitinkie; Palladin; RnMomof7; ...

PINGING.......


4 posted on 06/23/2004 5:30:25 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Detective details showdown

Detective details showdown

BY GARTH STAPLEY and JOHN COTÉ

BEE STAFF WRITERS

Last Updated: June 23, 2004, 04:20:00 AM PDT

REDWOOD CITY -- The confrontation was almost inevitable. Scott Peterson, realizing he was being followed, shifted from prey to pursuer as he approached the unmarked police car.

Detective Al Brocchini, who had appeared on a national crime-fighting program during the search for Peterson's pregnant wife, Laci, had followed his No. 1 suspect to Fresno on Feb. 1, 2003.

Scott Peterson pierced the detective's shield of secrecy near the home of Amber Frey, who had told the world only a few days earlier that she was Peterson's "other woman."

Brocchini exited his car for the showdown.......

5 posted on 06/23/2004 5:41:23 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
I got your links right here, Scotty...


6 posted on 06/23/2004 5:46:49 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (John Kerry - Not the Swiftest Boat in the Delta.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
‘Stealth juror’ claims invalid, DA maintains

By Michelle Durand, Daily Journal Staff

Claims that an elderly “stealth juror” tried sneaking her way onto the Scott Peterson double-murder trial jury in hopes of convicting him have “no factual basis,” District Attorney Jim Fox said yesterday.

On Monday, Fox hinted at his findings to the Daily Journal but only officially said yesterday he would not file criminal perjury charges against Dawn O’Dell, the 66-year-old woman accused of trying to undermine the jury.

“There is insufficient evidence,” he reported.

O’Dell told others on a bus trip to Reno that she planned to be picked and become the foreperson in the sensational trial, according to a man who alerted Peterson’s defense team. O’Dell allegedly felt Peterson is guilty of murdering his pregnant wife and wanted him to receive the death penalty, said the man who was reportedly sitting in front of O’Dell on the bus......

7 posted on 06/23/2004 5:55:14 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

>>On Greta last night they said that the cement anchor, the only one Snott had left, was brought into court today. Fieger said it was a very chilling moment....it was a small, 8"x8" homemade anchor. He said it was painfully obvious that this along with the other missing ones were made to weight a body down. He said it was much too small to anchor a boat of that size in the tides of the bay.
His words sent chills thru me.<<

Good Morning!!

You know I used to dislike Feiger, BIG TIME, but I'm liking him more and more.


8 posted on 06/23/2004 6:00:02 AM PDT by sissyjane (You're either with us or against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
From Purgatory forum, Rickamorti1

"NE EXCLUSIVE LACI MURDER TRIAL COVERAGE

KEY DEFENSE EXPERT REFUSES TO TESTIFY

CYRIL WECHT WILL NOT TESTIFY ON SCOTT'S BEHALF

BY David Wright and Don Gentile

SYNOPSIS

The difference between life and death for Scott Peterson may be the ability of his attorney Mark Geragos to prove his claim that Laci's baby was born alive.

But one of the experts hired by the defense won't support that claim, The, NE has learned exclusively. And top experts have told the NE flat-out that the child died while still in his mother's womb!

snip

Cyril Wecht will not testify in Scott's trial, "Although Wecht told the NE the matter was still up in the air." "The obvious conclusion has to be that he doesn't agree with the defense theory," said a source.

Geragos stunned the court in his opening statement by asserting that Scott could not have murdered his wife and unborn child Christmas Eve 2002 because the child was born alive. "The evidence will show that the baby lived beyond the 24th of December." "If that happened, then Laci was alive, or the baby was born alive and kept alive, one or the other."

Geragos' claim is one of the most crucial elements in his defense strategy. He bases it on a comparison of Conners' estimated age on Christmas Eve 2002, the day Laci vanished, with the baby's estimated age after he washed ashore four months later on April 13, 2003.

DR. Brian Peterson, who conducted the autopsy on Laci and Conner and testified at Scott's preliminary hearing, stated that the infant was between 33 and 38 weeks old, approximately the age of a full-term baby.

"Although he strongly believed the baby was not born alive, he could not rule it out, Dr. Peterson said under questioning from Geragos.

On the day Laci vanished Conner's age was 32 weeks, according to her gynecologist, said Geragos. The attorney intends to point to the difference between the 32 weeks and the 32 to 38 weeks as an indication that Laci and her cild where alive for some time after she disappeared. In that case Scott, who was fishing at the Berkeley Marina that day, could not be the killer, he said.

But Dr. Lawrence Kobilinsky, professor of forensic science at New York's famed John Jay College of Criminal Justice, told the NE: "his argument is horse crap!' "There's no way he can prove the baby was born alive.

"What he's really saying is that when the dead infant was looked at, the impression was that the fetus was older than the fetus would have been had Laci been killed December 24 and dumped in the water."

"That's based on physical characteristics of the fetus, but any knowledgeable medical person knows that's an imprecise science.

"You have variants such as state of nutrition of the mother, her health, the date of conception. The correct age of the fetus, can vary by weeks."

Forensic scientist Dr. Werner Spitz added that a fetus does not grow all that much after 31 weeks. "This baby was not born alive," Spitz told the NE.

While Geragos may be able to bring in experts to replace Dr. Wecht and muddle the issue, he won't be able to explain away a key factor about Conner's body, according to Kobilinsky and Spitz.

The infant's corpse was in a much lesser state of decomposition that his mother's corpse. In, fact, Dr. Peterson's autopsy estimated the baby had been exposed to underwater elements for no more than two days. There were no signs of animal feeding, he said.

The baby's skin appearance was identical to that of a child who dies in the mother's womb, a condition known as "maceration," Dr. Peterson noted.

Laci's body was obviously in the water for months. It was nearly skeletal, missing the head, hands, feet and most major organs, but her uterus was present.

"With time and tidal actions and animal feeding, as the abdominal wall wore away, eventually the upper part of the uterus wore away. At that time, the fetus was released," Dr. Peterson testified at the prelim.

Dr. Spitz explained that the uterus is the last organ to decompose in a woman.

Conner was protected from the elements inside his mother until the very end. "There is no other explanation," said Spitz.

snip

Geragos also told the jury he will prove that tape or twine found knotted around the infant's neck had to be deliberately placed there by someone, another indication the baby was born alive.

But Dr. Spitz, who has examined numerous bodies found in water, said all sorts of debris can become attached to the body in strange ways. He added: "The loop of the tape could have possibly floated onto the child's feet and worked its way up to the neck with tidal action."

OK TO COPY TO OTHER FORUMS!"

Thank you RickAMorti1

9 posted on 06/23/2004 6:00:55 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
should of put the link: Purgatory
10 posted on 06/23/2004 6:05:03 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: runningbear

>>Peterson told police in the taped interview that on the morning of Dec. 24, he and his wife watched the Martha Stewart show in which Stewart talks about meringues. Brocchini reviewed a tape of the show from that day and found no mention of meringues, indicating that Peterson was lying and suggesting that the show on meringues actually aired the day before.

But during opening statements, Peterson attorney Mark Geragos took much pleasure out of showing a video of Martha Stewart mentioning meringues on the very show Peterson said they'd watched.

On Tuesday, Brocchini acknowledged to prosecutor Rick Distaso that he'd missed the reference to meringues, which was mentioned only once in the Dec. 24 show, but eight times on the Dec. 23 show. <<

BINGO!!!!

From the Chronical article!!!


11 posted on 06/23/2004 6:11:46 AM PDT by sissyjane (You're either with us or against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane
further states, that Meringues weren't mentioned until 28 mins or so into the show, which delays Scott's time alibi!

More from Purgatory forum:

The gun:

"Lead Det. Al Brocchini found a Llama 22-caliber handgun in the glove compartment of Peterson's Ford F-150 pickup truck. Peterson told the cops he had been pheasant-hunting about a month before, bu the gun was "dry-fired," then it "misfired again," so he put it in the glove compartment and forgot about it.

Famed forensic pathologist and ballistic expert Robert H. Goldberg found the gun testimony fascinating. "They wouldn't go to the trouble and expense of bringing in a firearms expert unless they had some physical proof," he tells the GLOBE. "There could be blood or gunshot evidence we haven't heard about yet."

Goldberg says the prosecutor's firearms witness will be able to tell if the gun is broken like Peterson said it was. "If the gun can be fired, the Scott is caught in a lie." he notes. "And if not why bring in this witness?"

Ressler concludes "If Scott Peterson is innocent he's certainly made some odd statement." ""

12 posted on 06/23/2004 6:15:39 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: runningbear

I just wish the talking heads on TV would SHUT UP!! Michael Cardoza made me so mad when he was on LKL Monday, that I won't watch it again!!

These articles today are fascinating!!


13 posted on 06/23/2004 6:29:22 AM PDT by sissyjane (You're either with us or against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
What?No Wecht?
No surprise. The Geragos version of OJ's defense is sputtering along. Remember those witnesses in Cochran's opening statement that he said had exculpatory testimony? They never made it to the stand, either. Word of advice to Geragos, try the "Twinkee" defense.
14 posted on 06/23/2004 6:42:40 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane
You know I used to dislike Feiger, BIG TIME, but I'm liking him more and more.

Don't let his occasional moments of clarity and sensibility get to you -- he's still a dickweed.

15 posted on 06/23/2004 6:46:28 AM PDT by DJ Frisat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Why, speak of the devil!!!!!


16 posted on 06/23/2004 6:57:29 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The LINE has been drawn. While the narrow minded see a line, the rest see a circle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

Thanks for carrying that over from yesterday's thread sis, you read my mind...I was just about to do that!
Mornin'!


17 posted on 06/23/2004 7:01:50 AM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O

Good Morning, and you're welcome!!


18 posted on 06/23/2004 7:04:08 AM PDT by sissyjane (You're either with us or against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: runningbear; Howlin; juzcuz; All
Speaking of "Stealth Juror"...ALSO last night on Greta;
Juror #5 was whining t the Judge about a "CTV lady" that was saying some disparaging things about him. Says his girlfriend told him, and he wanted to go out to talk to the press to straighten things out.
This guy is a FLAKE, BIG TIME!! First of all, he should not be talking to ANYONE about the case, let alone following the coverage! What a dunce he is to announce to the Judge that he is doing both!!!
19 posted on 06/23/2004 7:06:13 AM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Peterson told the cops he had been pheasant-hunting about a month before,

ROTFLMAO!

Pheasant hunting with a pistol!

That's as crazy as fishing with packaged lures.

20 posted on 06/23/2004 7:16:43 AM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast

He told the cops he went pheasant hunting the month before, but he also told the cops that he hadn't fired that gun in a year! That it was probably registered to his father, and that he forgot it was there.

Which one is it??


21 posted on 06/23/2004 8:09:41 AM PDT by sissyjane (You're either with us or against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: runningbear

Jeff Feiger told Greta weeks ago that Dr. Wecht wasn't going to testify and why so it's not a NE Exclusive.


22 posted on 06/23/2004 8:18:05 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
Too bad Laci's dad can't show him what's on the business end of these links:


23 posted on 06/23/2004 8:18:06 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Burger-Eating War Monkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

He would have used a shotgun for pheasant.

The reason for having the handgun "because I'm a hunter" must apply to shooting sturgeon. First you gotta stun 'em with a whack from the packaged lures, though.


24 posted on 06/23/2004 8:28:35 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

>>because I'm a hunter" must apply to shooting sturgeon. First you gotta stun 'em with a whack from the packaged lures, though.<<

ROTFLMAO!!!!



25 posted on 06/23/2004 8:32:19 AM PDT by sissyjane (You're either with us or against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

lol

Then you drown them with concrete anchors??!!

Makes about as much sense as anything else Snotty has said.

Pinz


26 posted on 06/23/2004 8:39:15 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: runningbear

Let's put it this way, if Scott hadn't murdered Laci the BABY would be alive. So, in or out of Laci, Scott murdered TWO people.


27 posted on 06/23/2004 8:44:09 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: runningbear

Can forensic doctors tell from the autopsy if the baby's lungs ever inflated?


28 posted on 06/23/2004 9:01:25 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

First you gotta stun 'em with a whack from the packaged lures
---
I think he trolled using the whole package of unopened lures..


29 posted on 06/23/2004 9:19:51 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O

I wish I could see the video they are showing in the court room.. I can't imagine what people are commenting about concerning his demeanor that he was ODDLY calm, cool, etc. The only reference I have is the D. Sawyer interview I thought he looked calm and cool in that one..


30 posted on 06/23/2004 9:27:28 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O

On Dan's show, he said that while they were in camera with the judge, going over whether #5 should be removed from the jury, Geragos stuck up for him and acted like it was HIS idea to keep him on the jury.

Abrams also said that even after the judge had told #5 that he could stay on the jury, #5 asked the judge if he could go out and TALK to the media!!!

This guy is trouble; he's going for his 15 minutes of fame; if he stays on the jury, it will be hung.


31 posted on 06/23/2004 9:29:41 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O

This guy is a FLAKE, BIG TIME!!
----
Agreed. Judge should have kicked him off. He could be one to find the case against Snott due to Media spin.


32 posted on 06/23/2004 9:39:48 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: runningbear

First..congrats for running the thread.. and a small suggetsion, if I might. It might be edifying to do an informal poll of the ping list everyweekend, to see what the folks think about the previous week's events..do they think he'll beat it, etc. Nothing too complicated, maybe 2-3 questions..regards...


33 posted on 06/23/2004 9:40:09 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Some say this is no "Judge Ito" and I don't think he is, but it seems insane to leave this flake on the jury. He looks like Trouble, capital T intentional.


34 posted on 06/23/2004 9:43:57 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Dan Abrams was beside himself about this the other night; he thinks that Geragos is running the courtroom and the judge is letting him get away with it.


35 posted on 06/23/2004 9:46:37 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

bump


36 posted on 06/23/2004 9:46:56 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

Notice tho that our good ole Forensic whore Henry Lee is still prepared to "manipulate" the facts and "masacre" the English language!! All for $$$$$ of course.


37 posted on 06/23/2004 10:01:15 AM PDT by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O

Jackie I am more than SHOCKED that this Juror has NOT been replaced!! What's up with the Judge??? There are 6 alternates sitting there where a Juror could be chosen from instantly!! This guy is really bugging me. THIS is NOT normal behaviour for a person in the courtroom, let alone a Juror.


38 posted on 06/23/2004 10:04:20 AM PDT by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

YES if they have Not started to liquify or decompose.


39 posted on 06/23/2004 10:06:30 AM PDT by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

Fox/Vester:
Brochini says: Scott had Girlfriends...
Defense will use to justify defense theory Amber focus wrong.


40 posted on 06/23/2004 10:21:00 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

The fact that Snott had many Girlfriends reinforces the theory that the motive was over money.


41 posted on 06/23/2004 10:23:59 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
What's up with the Judge???

This is really worrisome. Someone please tell me there isn't a hidden agenda here.

42 posted on 06/23/2004 10:44:17 AM PDT by Lucy Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All

WS/CNN
Breaking news- Juror #5 will be booted by the judge.

I don't know if this is true.


43 posted on 06/23/2004 10:45:22 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage; Howlin; juzcuz; All
I also heard a talking head mention that alternate #1 is reported to be a "favorable to the Defense" juror. Maybe the Prosecution didn't object too much about #5 because of that???
44 posted on 06/23/2004 10:57:46 AM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz

Wow, speaking of the Devil...maybe Judge saw the tape, wasn't it due to be turned over today??


45 posted on 06/23/2004 10:59:18 AM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz

Peterson Judge Wants To Toss Juror

POSTED: 10:28 am PDT June 23, 2004
UPDATED: 10:51 am PDT June 23, 2004

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. -- The judge hearing the Scott Peterson double murder case has apparently decided to remove Juror No.5 -- a former airport security screener who was videotaped last week saying something to Laci Peterson's brother as they both entered the courthouse -- for 'some kind of misconduct.'


46 posted on 06/23/2004 11:03:13 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
I've heard Stan Goldman say that Alternate #1 is a doctor and a lawyer.

I think MG is playing both sides here, 'cause I sure don't think he would want a doctor on that jury.

47 posted on 06/23/2004 11:04:03 AM PDT by EllaMinnow ("President Reagan has left us, but he has left us stronger and better." President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O

I also heard a talking head mention that alternate #1
---
I heard that alternate #1 is a doctor and a lawyer..

Don't know yet if #5 is gone for sure. I haven't heard it on the news..


48 posted on 06/23/2004 11:05:00 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
I understand that the comment was totally innocuous and blown out of proportion.

The comment made was not what was represented by the press, as I understood it.

CNN has been having a real bad egg on face week.

49 posted on 06/23/2004 11:08:06 AM PDT by Cold Heat ("Politics is not a bad profession. If you disgrace yourself, you can always write a book."(Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

The judge hearing the Scott Peterson double murder case has apparently decided to remove Juror No.5 -
---

WoooHoo.. :) To bad it's not friday, I'd like to pose a toast the judge..


50 posted on 06/23/2004 11:09:51 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-398 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson