Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Differance between the Marine Corps and the US Army

Posted on 06/24/2004 7:35:57 AM PDT by ma bell

This is the differance between the mighty mighty Marine Corps and the obsolete US Army (of course, take the ribbing to heart Army...:) yes, I know, we are part of the Department of Navy, but it is the Mens Department.



TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous; Political Humor/Cartoons; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: usar; usmc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 361-376 next last
To: Chieftain

I'm defending the Army and 82nd as they die in battle.

This creep, with no justification, is dishonoring men who are at risk and some dead.

Your complaint about me falls on death ears because I could say some nasty stuff about Marines, but I haven't.

There are recent pathetic things that have happened to Marines that could be mentioned - but I won't.


241 posted on 06/24/2004 7:38:07 PM PDT by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: idkfa

That debate was settled 3 pages back, it's not an Army cover.

Not that it matters.


242 posted on 06/24/2004 7:40:10 PM PDT by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: ma bell

Guessing that someone else has noticed, so I will not scroll on to find why this thread is so large, but the fellow on the right is Air Force, not Army.


243 posted on 06/24/2004 7:45:15 PM PDT by harrowup (Just naturally perfect and humble of course)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas
i misspoke... separate service... i was taken aback by the suggestion that one man's service in our armed forces was better than another's, and i am not one to justify such in fighting amongst american service men...

the photo of the two servicemen was made out to be demeaning to man in fatigues with the baby carriage, disparaging two ideals i hold dear... service to our country and fatherhood.

i never said i was perfect, a thread demeaning one or both of these ideals deserves more attention than my lack of knowledge...

my apologies for my ignorance, but i stand up for all who serve our country and condemn all who promote conflict amongst ourselves as petty individuals.

teeman8r
244 posted on 06/24/2004 8:25:55 PM PDT by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Rockpile

no, but you could


245 posted on 06/24/2004 8:54:08 PM PDT by jpsb (Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: ma bell
U.S.M.C. - 0311/0811 - President Nixon - 1969-1971.

The Navy thinks MARINE stands for My A$$ Rides In Navy Equipment.
The AirForce thinks MARINE is talking about Maureen Ohara
The Army thinks...oh wait, that's an oxymoron.

To all in servicemen/women and veterans....HAND SALUTE !...and Thank You !
246 posted on 06/24/2004 11:45:51 PM PDT by stylin19a (I'm not sure if my problem is speeling errors or tryping errors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE
Well golly the Air Force gets sent home on orders after three months-what's your point? The facts are that the Marines aren't staying in theater as long as the Army (including the North Carolina National Guard-BTW dumba$$ the Army guard and reserves have taken over 120 KIA compared to the oh-so-super-hard Marine Corps 160, for part-time soldiers we sure are putting up a hell of a fight) so they have little room to talk smack (you being an idiot, of course, fail to realize this).

As I said earlier, the greatest victories of American arms belong to the United States Army. Too bad you drank so deeply of the boot camp kool-aid.

247 posted on 06/25/2004 5:39:13 AM PDT by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE
Force rotation...orders...from CENTCOM....and higher....sent the 1st MARDIV home.

That's pretty slick, but LTG Jan Huly-deputy commandant for plans, policy and operations, Headquarters U.S. Marine Corps-makes it pretty clear that this is Marine Corps policy when he says here: "Okay, I can't explain on the difference, but I'll give you a little background on why we go for seven months. During the mid- to late-1970s, the Marine Corps adopted a six-to-seven month rotation tour policy to meet our commitments globally...So, we adopted that construct many years ago.

I'm going to assume that you are merely stupid and not intentionally lying, but I could be wrong.

248 posted on 06/25/2004 6:15:58 AM PDT by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE
More here: "During a Thursday meeting with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Corps Commandant Gen. Michael Hagee made a 'good and compelling' case to keep the seven-month rotation, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said Monday...'Seven-month rotations will be the way we will be doing business,' said Corps spokesman Maj. Jason Johnston."

And here: "Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Michael Hagee met Thursday with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to dissuade him from changing the current length of tours for U.S. Marines deployed to Iraq, officials said.
Rumsfeld is mulling whether to increase the service’s seven-month rotation to a full year, as it is with the Army.
“Gen. Hagee is firmly committed to keeping the seven-month rotations in Iraq and met with the secretary to discuss that,” Maj. Jason Johnston, Hagee’s spokesman, said Friday. “We were at Camp Lejeune [in North Carolina] on Tuesday, and then, and in every speech and talk since then, he has been adamant about continuing the seven-month rotation cycle.”

Meanwhile 1st Armored Division and 2nd ACR have been extended for over one year. It's integrity check time numbnuts. Let's see if you have any.

249 posted on 06/25/2004 6:40:46 AM PDT by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: ma bell
The Marines are where you put soldiers with low intelligence.

The Army is where you put soldiers with higher intelligence.

You give the simply-operated weapons to the Marines.

You give the complex weapons to the Army.

250 posted on 06/25/2004 6:46:15 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 91B

"During the mid- to late-1970s, the Marine Corps adopted a six-to-seven month rotation tour policy to meet our commitments globally...So, we adopted that construct many years ago."

Do you really think that HQ Marine Corps sets force levels in Iraq? You really think that the CG of 1st Mar Div packed his boys up last spring and went back to Pendleton on his own? You really have maxed out at not so specialist, haven't you?

The Marine Corps deploys globally, constantly. The Army moves to and from training areas occasionally, doing most of their work where they're stationed. As far as Marine Corps Iraqi Freedom deployments go...guess who is replacing 1st Mar Div units this fall? Marines that are just now coming back from six months in Afghanistan. I know it is hard for a guy that usually deploys to the armory one weekend a month for coffee and doughnuts to understand...but catch up, please.

Oh by the way...the standard Marine Corps tour in Vietnam was 13 months. You seem adept at using Google...look it up for yourself.

I'm going to assume that you're a mouth breathing oxygen thief swimming in a shallow gene pool, and I don't think I'm wrong.


251 posted on 06/25/2004 6:51:01 AM PDT by IGOTMINE ("By God, I pity those poor bastards we're going up against. By God I do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: 91B

Yes. Yes indeed. The great American victories like when the 106th Division gave it up like a drunken prom queen at the outset of the Battle of the Bulge. Who can forget the valiant mass surrender at Kasserine Pass? Task Force Smith, melting and running like snow in July at the outset of the Korean war. Let's not even talk about the Chosin Resevoir campaign. Two companines of Marines running around Grenada at will while the vaunted 82nd Airplane let a few Cubanos stop them cold. The debacle at LZ X-Ray...the one after the valiant studs of Colonel Hal Moore's command stopped the VC cold.

I guess the big thing I have against the army is that they don't serve "kool aid" in their boot camp. Soldiers have no sense of their service's history. (But their Army College Fund forms are filled out.) Then again, with a record like this, I guess maybe it's just as well.


252 posted on 06/25/2004 7:16:13 AM PDT by IGOTMINE ("By God, I pity those poor bastards we're going up against. By God I do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Yes. The Army gets complex weapons like the Sgt York that...doesn't get fielded because it doesn't work. And complex weapons like the Commanche...killed in its infancy after only a 20 year development cycle. I guess maybe those Russian tank regiments aren't coming through the Fulda Gap after all.


253 posted on 06/25/2004 7:19:03 AM PDT by IGOTMINE ("By God, I pity those poor bastards we're going up against. By God I do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: 91B

"More here: "During a Thursday meeting with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Corps Commandant Gen. Michael Hagee made a 'good and compelling' case to keep the seven-month rotation, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said Monday...'Seven-month rotations will be the way we will be doing business,' said Corps spokesman Maj. Jason Johnston."
And here: "Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Michael Hagee met Thursday with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to dissuade him from changing the current length of tours for U.S. Marines deployed to Iraq, officials said.
Rumsfeld is mulling whether to increase the service’s seven-month rotation to a full year, as it is with the Army.
“Gen. Hagee is firmly committed to keeping the seven-month rotations in Iraq and met with the secretary to discuss that,” Maj. Jason Johnston, Hagee’s spokesman, said Friday. “We were at Camp Lejeune [in North Carolina] on Tuesday, and then, and in every speech and talk since then, he has been adamant about continuing the seven-month rotation cycle.”

Meanwhile 1st Armored Division and 2nd ACR have been extended for over one year. It's integrity check time numbnuts. Let's see if you have any."

Yes. The Commandant used logic to persuade SECDEF that the Marine Corps can meet its requirements with a seven month deployment cycle. The Corps has operataional deployment committments above and beyond the 1st AD and 2nd ACR, and even the vaunted and lumbering "Big Army". The Corps can only meet those other requirements by maintaining a seven month cycle in Iraq.

The Corps will stand its ground wherever ordered. Now if only the Army had a better history of doing that...


254 posted on 06/25/2004 7:30:51 AM PDT by IGOTMINE ("By God, I pity those poor bastards we're going up against. By God I do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

I agree that it is impossible to know the consequences of a defeated France, but this I do know: nothing could have been worse than outcome of the peace treaty that ended WWI.


255 posted on 06/25/2004 7:32:42 AM PDT by quadrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE
So-you don't have any integrity. I've pointed out that the seven month deployment is Marine Corps policy and all those links support that fact. Of course the Army is also deployed to Kosovo, Bosnia and Korea (without any Marine assistance) but I guess that doesn't count.

Do you really think that HQ Marine Corps sets force levels in Iraq?

They obviously determine how long Marines will be deployed-which is the point. When it was determined that more force level was needed, Army units-not Marines-got extended.

Since you know so much about the European and African theaters in World War II-why don't you tell us a little more about the great Marine victories in those campaigns? I'll wait right here. Why don't you also expound on the great Marine Corps victories in the Civil War? I promise to wait with rapt attention.

256 posted on 06/25/2004 7:45:12 AM PDT by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE

BTW numbnuts-I am also familiar with how the Army bailed the Marines out on Pelelieu at Bloody Nose Ridge. As another poster on this thread has pointed out-the Army made more opposed amphibious landings in World War II than did the Marine Corps. Isn't that supposed to be the Corps specialty?


257 posted on 06/25/2004 7:48:03 AM PDT by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: ma bell

I think the regular ARMY and the MARINES are a lot different, but the ARMY does have special units that are very close to the MARINES, but I am very biased I love all our military ,but my beloved MARINES will always be special to me, I married and retired with one.


258 posted on 06/25/2004 7:56:20 AM PDT by douglas1 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

AND our retirement checks still are from the department of the NAVY .


259 posted on 06/25/2004 8:02:40 AM PDT by douglas1 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

That is weird .


260 posted on 06/25/2004 8:23:15 AM PDT by douglas1 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 361-376 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson