Posted on 06/28/2004 5:39:59 AM PDT by runningbear
I avoided that other big thread! LOL
Too busy with work and kids being home these days to properly keep up with this case. As of tonight, I think I'm up to date though!
The thing is that if Geragos throws out enough different theories, no matter how questionable, they will negate the circumstancial evidence againt Scott
I will be absolutely outraged if this guy goes free. I will feel the same way I did after Clinton was re-elected.
How true!
I think you're remembering something from Brent's or Amy's testimony. I think Amy left her car at Scott's and Laci's. Then I think she was with all of them either out at the park or at the copy store making missing posters, or maybe even at the police station, so she had to be driven back to get her car. Seems to me she had a brother with her (not Brent, but a brother who was someone who had the same mother as Amy.)
Oh, NOOO, Vel, you don't understand, see, Kim became infatuated by the alluring Scott BEFORE she actually had the privilege of meeting him! So, see, she had her ex-boyfriend's Hawaiian roommates kill Laci and hide the body, knowing that a search center would be set up, and that she could hang out there to bask in Scott's presence!
See, we really need to e-mail Mr. Geragos so he can explain these things to us.
LOLOL! Boy, and we think WE'RE busy! "Hey, can I pencil in a kidnapping here, or is the day too full already?"
I don't know how they know she was killed in the home, but I do remember when it appeared that they may have reached that conclusion. Let's see, their last searches of the home were about Feb. 18, 19, of 2003. Then, around the first week of March, the police actually called a press conference and announced very pointedly that, in spite of the fact that no body had been found, they were now sure that they were dealing with a HOMICIDE, not just a missing person case.
My guess is he got the $10,000 in cash from Mommy and Daddy... and Janey.
LOL, we shouldn't e-mail Hammer, he already appears to be suffering from delusions of grandeur, from being a Big TV Celebrity.
I just read your explanation of when the Ocean Enhancement has to be purchased. Cancel my question regarding, if Scott went through the Bay and continued out into the ocean! I see that the Ocean Enhancement applies to an area 250 miles away!
He still criticized the prosecution, but seemed much less puffed up..
Let's just PRAY that Scott takes the stand on Election Day, as O.J. did in 1994--which resulted in a magnified landslide for the GOP in grabbing 54 House seats--because all the chicks (and especially blacks) stayed home riveted to their TVs.
Hey, wait a minute! Now we've seen that the Dec. 23--24 fishing license has the year of 2003 on it, when it was supposedly issued in 2002, and we're speculating that the clerk just made a mistake.....what if that license really WAS bought in 2003? Perhaps... to back up an alibi that "I was out fishing when she disappeared, honest"? And back dated for Dec. 23-24? When did Scott first show this fishing license to the police?
Now that we know that (apparently) Amber was trying to slip around and not tell the police about EVERY time she talked to Scott--when in fact she'd promised to tell them about every time--it becomes very clear why she suddenly needed an attorney!
Why WOULD a guy have saved his old 2-day fishing licenses, even one that was 3 years old at the time, in a little clear bag in his glove compartment?
I've never saved a fishing license, after using it up,so to speak.
He had the marina receipt for the 24th so it really doesn't matter...they consider it legit....probably have a record of it at Big 5
Well, there's another thing. This kind of reminds me of those English mystery stories, where they say things like, "He remembered to wipe his feet, so as not to soil the carpet, as he dragged the body into the house." This attention to small details. I mean, if we assume that his real only purpose in going out "fishing" was to dump the evidence of his MURDER, then why was he so careful to be all "legal" about everything?
I mean, a ticket for fishing without a license would have been just as good a proof that he was out there, as a license would.
(Now, a ticket for dumping a body without a license, that would have been problematic...)
Well...I guess he wouldn't want to be caught breaking the law, now would he?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.